Skip to main content
Log in

Influences of Gender as a Basic-Level Category in Person Perception on the Gender Belief System

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of gender as an organizing category in social perception and its influence on the gender belief systemwere investigated. A modified version of the Role Construct Repertory Test and selected self-report questionnaires were completed by 190 college students (165 women and 25 men). All the participants used gender to organize their person schemas, and using gender in this way related positively to gender stereotyping. Both sexist gender attitudes and use of gender as an organizing category predicted gender stereotyping. Components of the gender belief system were only correlated if they were conceptually similar. The findings are congruent with gender transcendent and multifactorial gender identity theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archer, J. (1991). A methodological commentary on gender schema research. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 185–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, A. C., Critelli, J. W., Stevens, L. C., & Russel, S. (1986). Androgyny and sex role measurement: A personal construct approach. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 51, 1081–1088.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballard-Reisch, D., & Elton, M. (1992). Gender orientation and the Bem Sex Role Inventory: A psychological construct revisited. Sex Roles, 27, 291–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannister, D., & Mair, J. M. M. (1968). The evaluation of personal constructs. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition Vol. 1. Basic processes (2nd ed., pp. 1–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basow, S. A. (1992). Gender: Stereotypes and roles (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beere, C. A. (1990). Gender roles: A handbook of tests and measures. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cota, A. A., & Dion, K. L. (1986). Salience of gender and sex composition of ad hoc groups: An experimental test of distinctiveness theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 770–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & LaFrance, M. (1998). Gender. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindsey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 788–827). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T. (1993). Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 155–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1–74). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw–Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frable, D. E. S. (1989). Sex typing and gender ideology: Two facets of the individual's gender psychology that go together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frable, D. E. S. (1997). Gender, racial, ethnic, sexual, and class identities. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 139–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, S. A., & Lips, H. M. (1996). A response latency investigation of the gender schema. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayton, W. F., Sawyer, B. L., Baird, J. G., & Ozmon, K. L. (1982). Further validation of a new measure of machismo. Psychological Reports, 51, 820–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geis, F. L. (1993). Self-fulfilling prophecies: A social psychological view of gender. In A. E. Beall & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (pp. 9–54). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 119–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hefner, R., Rebecca, M., & Oleshansky, B. (1975). Development of sex-role transcendence. Human Development, 18, 143–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herron, W. G., Goodman, C. K., & Herron, M. J. (1983). Comparability of sex-role measures. Psychological Reports, 53, 1087–1094.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, J. L., & von Hippel, W. (1996). Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 237–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosoda, M., & Stone, D. L. (2000). Current gender stereotypes and their evaluative content. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90, 1283–1294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. A., & Hollander, J. (1997). Gendered situations, gendered selves: A gender lens on social psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudak, M. A. (1993). Gender schema theory revisited: Men's stereotypes of American women. Sex Roles, 28, 279–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs: A theory of personality (Vol. 1). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koestner, R., & Aube, J. (1995). A multifactorial approach to the study of gender characteristics. Journal of Personality, 63, 681–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E. (1988). Gender as a social category. Developmental Psychology, 24, 755–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., Crane, M., Bernstein, S., & Siladi, M. (1982). Self-schemas and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 38–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. L., & Halverson, C. F. (1983). The effects of sex-typing schemas on young children's memory. Child Development, 54, 563–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, T. J., Connor, J. M., & Colletti, G. (1987). Gender-based schematic processing: An emperical investigation and reevaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 937–945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, J. C. (1980). A factor analytic study of the items in three selected sex-role instruments. Psychological Reports, 46, 1119–1126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E. J., & Tetenbaum, T. J. (1979). Bem Sex Role Inventory: A theoretical and methodological critique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 996–1016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, D. C., Gillen, K., & Hill, P. (1999). Social psychology. London: E. Arnold.

  • Ravinder, S. (1987a). Androgyny: Is it really the product of educated, middle-Class western societies? Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 18, 208–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravinder, S. (1987b). An emperical investigation of Garnets and Pleck's role strain analysis. Sex Roles, 16, 165–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravinder, S. (1987c). Sex-role salience: An important component in the measurement of sex-role identity. Human Relations, 40, 741–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebecca, M., Hefner, R., & Oleshansky, B. (1976). A model of sex-role transcendence. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 197–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skitka, L. J., & Maslach, C. (1996). Gender as schematic category: A role construct approach. Social Behavior and Personality, 24, 53–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. J., Noll, J. A., & Bryant, J. B. (1999). The effects of social context on gender self-concept. Sex Roles, 40, 499–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T. (1993). Gender-related traits and gender ideology: Evidence for a multifactorial theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 624–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Buckner, C. E. (1995). Masculinity and femininity: Defining the undefinable. In P. J. Kalbfleisch & M. J. Cody (Eds.), Gender, power and communication in human relationships (pp. 105–138). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Buckner, C. E. (2000). Instrumental and expressive traits, trait stereotypes, and sexist attitudes: What do they signify? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 44–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity & femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, & antecedents. Austin, TX: Univeristy of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Sawin, L. L. (1985). Images of masculinity and femininity: A reconceptualization. In V. E. O'Leary, R. K. Unger, & B. S. Wallston (Eds.), Women, gender, and social psychology (pp. 35–66). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villemez, W. J., & Touhey, J. C. (1977). A measure of individual differences in sex stereotyping and sex discrimination: The "Macho" Scale. Psychological Reports, 41, 411–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyer, R. S., & Carlston, D. E. (1994). The cognitive representation of persons and events. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition: Vol. 1. Basic processes (2nd ed., pp. 41–98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcel Harper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harper, M., Schoeman, W.J. Influences of Gender as a Basic-Level Category in Person Perception on the Gender Belief System. Sex Roles 49, 517–526 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025884723841

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025884723841

Navigation