Skip to main content
Log in

Saving Lives: A Review of the Record

  • Published:
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I present evidence on the cost-effectiveness of 76 regulatory actions promulgated by the Federal government from 1967 to 2001 by updating similar work published by the author in 1986. The paper first responds to several critiques of the original article recently published in prominent law journals by showing that most of the specific criticism is based on misrepresentations and mistakes. Wide differences in cost-effectiveness indicate we could save lives more effectively. Regulations aimed at reducing safety and cardiovascular risks have been more cost-effective than regulations aimed at reducing cancer risks. I suggest several potential regulations that could save lives more cost-effectively than the vast majority of regulations issued to date.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow, Kenneth et al. (1996). "It there a Role for Benefit-Cost Analysis in Environmental, Health, and Safety Regulation?" Science 272, 221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breyer, Stephen. (1993). Breaking the Vicious Circle: Toward Effective Risk Regulation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broder, Ivy and John Morrall. (1983). "The Economic Basis for OSHA's and EPA's Generic Carcinogen Regulations." In Richard Zeckhauser and Derek Leebaert (eds.), What Role for Government? Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donohue, John. (1999). "Why We Should Discount the Views of Those Who Discount Discounting," The Yale Law Journal 108, 1901–1910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrow, Scott and Michael Toman. (1999). "Using Environmental Benefit-Cost Analysis to Improve Government Performance," Environment 41, 12–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrow, Scott. (2000). "Improving Regulatory Performance: Does Executive Office Oversight Matter?" AEIBrookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies.

  • Garber, Alan. (1999). "Advances in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Health Interventions," National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 7198.

  • Hahn, Robert. (1999). "Regulatory Reform: Assessing the Government's Numbers," AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies.

  • Hahn, Robert, Randall Lutter, and W. Kip Viscusi. (2000). "Do Federal Regulations Reduce Mortality?" Washington: AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Health Canada. (2001). "Priority Substance List Assessment Report—Formaldehyde."

  • Heinzerling, Lisa. (1998). "Regulatory Costs of Mythic Proportions," The Yale Law Journal 107, 1981–2070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinzerling, Lisa and Frank Ackerman. (2002). "The Humbugs of the Anti-Regulatory Movement," Cornell Law Review 87, 648–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, F. et al. (2002). "Fish and Omega-3 Fatty Acid Intake and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease inWomen," Journal of the American Medical Association 287, 1815–1821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kniesner, Thomas and W. KipViscusi. (2003). "Why Relative Economic Position Does Not Matter:ACost-Benefit Analysis," Yale Journal of Regulation 20, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutter, Randall and John Morrall. (1994). "Health-Health Analysis: A New Way to Evaluate Health and Safety Regulation," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 8, 43–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutter, Randall, John Morrall, and W. Kip Viscusi. (1999). "The Cost-Per-Life-Saved Cutoff for Safety-Enhancing Regulations," Economic Inquiry 37, 599–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutter, Randall and Katherine Tucker. (2003). "Unacknowledged Health Benefits of Genetically Modified Food: Salmon and Heart Disease Deaths," AgBioForum 5, 59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarity, Thomas. (1998). "A Cost-Benefit State," Administrative Law Review 50, 7–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarity, Thomas and Ruth Ruttenberg. (2002). "Counting the Cost of Health, Safety, and Environmental Regulation," Texas Law Review 80, 1997–2057.

  • Mendelhoff, John. (1988). The Dilemma of Toxic Substance Regulation. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern, Richard (ed.). (1997). Economic Analysis at EPA: Assessing Regulatory Impact. Washington: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrall, John. (1986). "A Review of the Record," Regulation 10, 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, Albert and Richard Zeckhauser. (1986). "The Perils of Prudence: How Conservative Risk Assessments Distort Regulation," Regulation 10, 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (1976). Inflationary Impact Statement: Coke Oven Emissions.

  • Office of Management and Budget. (1986). "Comments onOSHA's Proposed Rulemaking: Occupational Exposure to Formaldehyde," (Available from the author).

  • Office of Management and Budget. (1990). 1990-1991 Regulatory Program of the United States Government Washington: GPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Management and Budget. (1992). 1991-1992 Regulatory Program of the United States Government.

  • Office of Management and Budget. (1992). 1991-1992 Regulatory Program of the United States Government. Washington: GPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Management and Budget. (2002a). Analytical Perspectives Budget of the United States Government FY 2003. Washington: GPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Management and Budget. (2002b). Stimulating Smarter Regulation: 2002 Report to Congress on the Cost and Benefits of Regulations.

  • Office of Management and Budget. (2003). “Draft 2003 Report to Congress and the Cost and Benefits of Federal Regulations,” Federal Register 68, 5513–5526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, R. et al. (2000). “Use of Automated External Defibrillators by a US Airline,” New England Journal of Medicine 343, 1210–1216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, Richard. (2003). “Grading the Government,” University of Chicago Law Review, forthcoming.

  • Redmond, C.K. et al. (1972). “Long-term Mortality Study of Steelworkers-VI. Mortality from Malignant Neoplasms Among Coke Oven Workers,” Journal of Occupational Medicine 14, 621–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seong, S. Kyung and John Mendelhoff. (2002). "Assessing the Accuracy of OSHA's Estimation of the Benefit of Safety Standards," University of Pittsburgh.

  • Sunstein, Cass. (1996). "Health-Health Tradeoffs," University of Chicago Law Review 63, 1533–1548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tengs, Tammyet al. (1995). "Five-Hundred Life-Saving Interventions and Their Cost-Effectiveness," Risk Analysis 15, 369–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip. (1974). "Mortality Effects of Regulatory Costs and Policy Evaluation Criteria," RAND Journal of Economics 25, 94–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip. (1992). Fatal Tradeoffs: Public and Private Responsibilities for Risk. NewYork: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip, John Hakes, and Alan Carlin. (1997). "Measures of Mortality Risk," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 14, 213–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip and Joseph Aldy. (2003). "The Value of Statistical Life: A Critical Review of Market Estimates Throughout the World," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 27(1), 5–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeckhauser, Richard and W. Kip Viscusi. (1990). "Risk Within Reason," Science 248, 559–563.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John F. Morrall III.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morrall III, J.F. Saving Lives: A Review of the Record. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 27, 221–237 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025841209892

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025841209892

Navigation