Skip to main content
Log in

Marginality and national Red Listing of species

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Dempster J.A. 1989. Insect introductions: natural dispersal and population persistence in insects. The Entomologist 108: 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis R.L.H. 1997. An inflated conservation load for European butterflies: increases in rarity and endemism accompany increases in species richness. Journal of Insect Conservation 1: 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denno R.F., Roderick G.K., Peterson M.A., Huberty A.F., Döbel H.G., Eubanks M.D., Losey J.E. and Langellotto G.A. 1996. Habitat persistence underlies intraspecific variation in dispersal strategies of planthoppers. Ecological Monographs 66: 389–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors U. 2001. Classifying threatened species at national versus global levels. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16: 511–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors U., Hilton-Taylor C., Mace G.M. and Rodríguez J.P. 2001. The application of IUCN Red List Criteria at regional levels. Conservation Biology 15: 1206–1212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton J.H. 1993. Range, population abundance and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 409–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samways M.J. 2002a. A strategy for national red listing invertebrates based on experiences with Odonata in South Africa. African Entomology 10: 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samways M.J. 2002b. Red Listed Odonata species in Africa. Odonatologica 31: 117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samways M.J., Osborn R., Hastings H. and Hattingh V. 1999. Global climate change and accuracy of prediction of species geographical ranges: establishment success of introduced ladybirds (Coccinellidae, Chilocorus spp.) worldwide. Journal of Biogeography 26: 795–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shreeve T.G., Dennis R.L.H. and Pullin A.S. 1996. Marginality: scale determined processes and the conservation of the British butterfly fauna. Biodiversity and Conservation 5: 1131–1141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas C.D., Bodsworth E.J., Wilson R.J., Simmons A.D., Davies Z.G., Musche M. and Conradt L. 2001. Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins. Nature 411: 577–581.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Samways, M.J. Marginality and national Red Listing of species. Biodiversity and Conservation 12, 2523–2525 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025840000200

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025840000200

Navigation