Advertisement

Future Greenhouse Gas and Local Pollutant Emissions for India: Policy Links and Disjoints

  • Amit GargEmail author
  • P.R. Shukla
  • Debyani Ghosh
  • Manmohan Kapshe
  • Nair Rajesh
Article

Abstract

This paper estimates the future greenhousegas (GHG) and local pollutant emissions forIndia under various scenarios. Thereference scenario assumes continuation ofthe current official policies of the Indiangovernment and forecasts of macro-economic,demographic and energy sector indicators.Other scenarios analyzed are the economicgrowth scenarios (high and low), carbonmitigation scenario, sulfur mitigationscenario and frozen (development) scenario.The main insight is that GHG and localpollutant emissions from India, althoughconnected, do not move in synchronizationin future and have a disjoint under variousscenarios. GHG emissions continue to risewhile local pollutant emissions decreaseafter some years. GHG emission mitigationtherefore would have to be pursued for itsown sake in India. National energy securityconcerns also favor this conclusion sincecoal is the abundant national resource whilemost of the natural gas has to be imported.The analysis of contributing factors tothis disjoint indicates that sulfurreduction in petroleum oil products andpenetration of flue gas desulfurisationtechnologies are the two main contributorsfor sulfur dioxide (SO2) mitigation.The reduction in particulate emissions ismainly due to enforcing electro-staticprecipitator efficiency norms in industrialunits, with cleaner fuels and vehicles alsocontributing substantially. These policytrends are already visible in India.Another insight is that high economicgrowth is better than lower growth tomitigate local pollution as lack ofinvestible resources limits investments incleaner environmental measures. Ouranalysis also validates the environmentalKuznets' curve for India as SO2emissions peak around per capita GDP ofUS$ 5,300–5,400 (PPP basis) under variouseconomic growth scenarios.

disjoint future emissions Kuznets' curve mitigation scenario analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Biswas, D. (ed.): 1999, Parivesh Newsletter: June 1999, New Delhi, Central Pollution Control Board, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.Google Scholar
  2. Bologna, M.: 2002, ‘Results of Sulfur Dioxide auction suggest companies anticipate gentler enforcement’, Envir. Rep. 33(13), ISSN 1521-9410, March 29, 2002, pp. 678–679.Google Scholar
  3. Chandler, W., Schaeffer, R., Dadi, Z., Shukla, P.R., Tudela, F., Davidson, O. and Alpan-Atamer, S.: 2002, Climate Change Mitigation in Developing Countries: Brazil, China, India, Mexico, South Africa, and Turkey, Pew Center on Global Climate Change.Google Scholar
  4. CMIE (Center for Monitoring Indian Economy): 1999, India's Energy Sector, Mumbai, Center for Monitoring Indian Economy.Google Scholar
  5. CMIE (Center for Monitoring Indian Economy): 2002, Energy, Mumbai, Economic Intelligence Service, Center for Monitoring Indian Economy.Google Scholar
  6. CPCB: 1991, Status Report on Ambient Air Quality, New Delhi, Central Pollution Control Board, Government of India.Google Scholar
  7. CPCB: 1996, Status Report on Ambient Air Quality, New Delhi, Central Pollution Control Board, Government of India.Google Scholar
  8. Flynn, P.C.: 2002, ‘Commercializing an alternate vehicle fuel: lessons learned from natural gas for vehicles’, Energy Policy 30, 613–619.Google Scholar
  9. Garg, A., Shukla, P.R., Bhattacharya, S. and Dadhwal, V.K.: 2001a, ‘Sub-region (District) and sector level SO2 and NOX Emissions for India: Assessment of Inventories and Mitigation Flexibility’, Atmos. Envir. 35, 703–713.Google Scholar
  10. Garg, A., Bhattacharya, S., Shukla, P.R. and Dadhwal, V.K.: 2001b, ‘Sectoral and regional Greenhouse Gases Emissions for India’, Atmos. Envir. 35, 2679–2695.Google Scholar
  11. Garg, A., Ghosh, D. and Shukla, P.R.: 2001c, ‘Integrated energy and environment modelling and analysis for India’, OPSEARCH, Kolkata, India, February.Google Scholar
  12. Garg, A. and Shukla P.R.: 2002, Emission Inventory of India, New Delhi, India, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited.Google Scholar
  13. GOI (Government of India): 2000, Economic Survey of India 1999-2000, New Delhi, Ministry of Finance, Government of India.Google Scholar
  14. GOI (Government of India): 2001, Approach Paper to the Tenth Five Year Plan (2002-2007), New Delhi, Planning Commission, Government of India.Google Scholar
  15. Grubler, A., Nakicenivic, N. and Schafer, A.: 1993, Dynamics of Transport and Energy Systems -History of Development and a Scenario for future, Austria, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.Google Scholar
  16. Guha,Manoj K.: 1999, ‘The US utility perspective on technology transfer through the CDM’, Presented in the Workshop on Development and Financing of Climate Change Partnership Projects, Organized by Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad, India, December 9-10.Google Scholar
  17. Hettige, H., Mani, M. and Wheeler, D.: 1997, Industrial Pollution in Economic Development: Kuznets revisite’, Development Research Group, World Bank, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  18. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): 2000, Special Report on Emissions Scenarios, USA, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kanudia, A. and Shukla, P.R.: 1998, ‘Modelling of uncertainties and price elastic demands in energy-environment planning for India, OMEGA, Int. J. Manag. Sci. 26(3).Google Scholar
  20. Kapshe, M., Garg, A., and Shukla, P.R.: 2002, ‘Application of AIM/Local model to India using area and large point sources’, in M. Kainuma, Y. Matsuoka and T. Morita (eds.), Climate Policy Assessment: Asia-Pacific Integrated Modeling, Tokyo, Japan, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  21. Kainuma, M., Matsuoka, Y. and Morita, T. (eds.): 2002, Climate Policy Assessment: Asia-Pacific Integrated Modeling, Tokyo, Japan, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  22. Kuznets, S.S.: 1955, Six Lectures on Economic Growth, New York, Free Press.Google Scholar
  23. Loulou, R., Shukla, P.R. and Kanudia, A.: 1997, Energy and Environment Strategies for a Sustainable Future: Analysis with the Indian MARKAL Model, New Delhi, India, Allied Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Mashelkar, R.A., Biswas, D.K., Krishnan, N.R., Mathur, O.P., Natarajan, R., Niyati, K.P., Shukla, P.R., Singh, D.V., Singhal, S.: 2002, Report of the Expert Committee on Auto Fuel Policy, New Delhi, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India.Google Scholar
  25. Pandey, R.: 2002, ‘Energy policy modeling: agenda for developing countries’, Energy Policy 30(2), 97–106.Google Scholar
  26. Pandey, R. and Shukla, P.R.: 2002, ‘Methodology for exploring co-benefits of CO2 and SO2 mitigation policies in India using AIM/Enduse model’, in M. Kainuma, Y. Matsuoka and T. Morita (eds.), Climate Policy Assessment: Asia-Pacific Integrated Modeling, Tokyo, Japan, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  27. Romanovskaya, A.A., Gytarsky, M.L., Karaban, R.T., Konushkov, D.E. and Nazarov, I.M.: 2002, ‘Nitrous oxide emission from agricultural lands in Russia’, Miti. Adapt. Strat. Gl. Change 7(1), 31–44.Google Scholar
  28. Sawa, T.: 1997, Japan's Experience in the Battle Against Air Pollution: Working towards Sustainable Development, Committee on Japan's experience in the battle against air pollution, Japan, The Pollution-Related Health Damage Compensation and Prevention Association.Google Scholar
  29. Schaeffer, R., Logan, J., Szklo, A.S., Chandler, W. and Marques, J.C. de S.: 2001, ‘Brazil's electric power choices and their corresponding carbon emissions implications’, Miti. Adapt. Strat. Gl. Change 6(1), 47–69.Google Scholar
  30. Soares, M.T. and Tolmasquim, M.T.: 2000, ‘Energy efficiency and reduction of CO2 emissions through 2015: The Brazilian cement industry’, Miti. Adapt. Strat. Gl. Change 5(3), 297–318.Google Scholar
  31. Swisher, J.N.: 1996, ‘Regulatory and mixed policy options for reducing energy use and carbon emissions’, Miti. Adapt. Strat. Gl. Change 1(1), 23–49.Google Scholar
  32. World Bank: 1994, Determinants of Cross-Country Income Inequality: An Augmented Kuznets Hypothesis, by Milanovic, Branko, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 1246, World Bank, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  33. World Bank: 1995, World Population Projections 1992-93 edition: Estimates and Projections with Related Demographic Statistics, Edward Bos, My T. Vu, Ann Levin, and Rodolfo A. Bulatao, World Bank, Washington DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amit Garg
    • 1
    Email author
  • P.R. Shukla
    • 2
  • Debyani Ghosh
    • 3
  • Manmohan Kapshe
    • 4
  • Nair Rajesh
    • 4
  1. 1.Project Management Cell, NATCOM Project, Winrock International IndiaNew Delhi –India
  2. 2.Public Systems GroupIndian Institute of ManagementVastrapur, AhmedabadIndia
  3. 3.Kennedy School of GovernmentHarvard UniversityU.S.A
  4. 4.Indian Institute of ManagementVastrapur, AhmedabadIndia

Personalised recommendations