Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Skew Selection: Nature Favors a Trickle-Down Distribution of Resources in Ants

  • Published:
Journal of Bioeconomics

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Synopsis: According to skew selection, ant queens are neither ruthlessly selfish nor blindly altruistic; they are shrewd investors. The goal of shrewd investors is not to win the game, but to continue play over evolutionary time. Skew selection describes a set of investment strategies employed by players such as ant queens to keep the game going. First, ant queens acquire excess resources—more than they need for immediate survival and reproduction. Second, queens invest a portion of their excess resources in personal capital to maintain dominant status. Third, queens also invest a portion of excess resources in low-quality offspring to gain group capital. Fourth, when investing in group capital, resources are distributed in a trickle-down fashion to maintain the largest number of diminishing-quality offspring possible. The trickle-down redistribution allows the shrewd queen to increase group size (safety in numbers) and, at the same time, maintain individual status (safety in position). According to skew selection, queens invest in low-quality offspring (sterile workers) to buffer hereself and her high-quality offspring from agents of death such as war, predation or disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Adams, Eldridge S. & Tschinkel, Walter R. 2001. Mechanisms of population regulation in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta: an experimental study. Journal of Animal Ecology 70:355-369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, Richard M. 1984. The evolution of cooperation. Harper Collins Pubs. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, Theodore. 1994. Primogeniture, monogamy and reproductive success in a stratified society. Unpublished. See Bergstrom website: http://www.econ.ucsb.edu

  • Betzig, Laura L. 1986. Depotism and differential reproduction: a darwinian view of history. New York, Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betzig, Laura L., Monique Borgerhoff-Mulder & P. Turke. 1988. Human reproductive behaviour: a Darwinian perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, Jack L. & Janet T. Landa. 1983. The economics of symbols, clan names, and religion. Journal of Legal Studies 12:135-156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carse, James P. 1986. Finite and infinite games: a vision of life as play and possibility. Ballantine Publishing Group. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassill, Deby. 2002. Yoyo-bang:A risk aversion investment strategy by a perennial insect society. Oecologia. 132:150-158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassill, Deby, Indira Kuriachen & S. Bradleigh Vinson. 2003. Gains in survivorship explain the evolution and maintenance of cooperative breeding among unrelated queens in an ant society. Journal of Theoretical Biology (in review).

  • Conniff, Richard. 2002. Why we take risks. Discover 22:62-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles. 1859. The origin of species. J. Murray, London (Penguin Books, 1968 edition) Pp. 459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, Richard. 1976. The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, Frans. 1998. Chimpanzee politics: power and sex among apes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flinn, Mark V. 1997. Culture and the evolution of social learning. Evolution and Human Behavior. 18:23-67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomendio, Montserrat. 1998. Book review editorial. TREE 13:121-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, William D. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behavior, I & II. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7:1-52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, William D. 1971. Geometry for the selfish herd. Journal of Theoretical Biology 31: 295-311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, Jack. 2000. The dark side of the force: economic foundations of conflict theory. Cambridge University Press, Pp. 360.

  • Hölldobler, Burt & Edward O. Wilson. 1995. The ants. Cambridge: Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, Elias L. 2000. Survival of the most foolish of fools: the limits of evolutionary selection theory. Journal of Bioeconomics 2:203-220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landa, Janet T. 1998. Bioeconomics of schooling fishes: selfish fish, quasi-free riders, and other fishy tales. Environmental Biology of Fishes 53:353-364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, Richard C. 1970. The units of selection. Annual Review in Ecology and Systematic 1:1-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macom, Thomas E. & Sanford D. Porter. 1996. Comparison of polygyne and monogyne red imported fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) population densities. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 89:535-543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, James B. 2001. Social homeostasis and foraging efficiency in monogyne Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) societies. Dissertation. Texas A & M University.

  • Pianka, Eric R. 1988. Evolutionary biology. Harper Collins Publishers Inc. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Sanford D. 1988. Impact of temperature on colony growth and developmental rates of the ant, Solenopsis invicta. Journal of Insect Physiology 34:1127-1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Sanford D. & Walter R. Tschinkel. 1993. Fire ant thermal preferences: behavioral control of growth and metabolism. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 32:321-329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raubenheimer, Davis & Stephen J. Simpson. 1994. The analysis of nutrient budgets. Functional Ecology 8:783-791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raubenheimer, David & Stephen J. Simpson. 1997. Integrative models of nutrient balancing: application to insects and vertebrates. Nutrition Research Review 10:151-179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, Hudson K. & Laurent Keller. 2001. Tests of reproductive-skew models in social insects. Annual Review of Entomology 46:347-385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Paul H. 2000a. Does ethnic conflict pay? Politics and the Life Sciences 19:59-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Paul H. 2000b. Hierarchy. Human Nature 11:259-279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, Paul W., Richard D. Alexander, & Jennifer U. Jarvis. 1991. The biology of the naked mole rat. Princeton University Press.

  • Simpson, Stephen J. & David Raubenheimer. 1996. Feeding behavior, sensory physiology and nutrient feedback: a unifying model. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 80:55-64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, Stephen J., David Raubenheimer,& P. G. Chambers. 1995. Nutritional homeostatsis. Pp. 251-278. in R.F. Chapman & J. de Boer (ed.) Regulatory Mechanisms of Insect Feeding. Chapman and Hall, N. Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, Eliot & David S. Wilson. 1998. Unto others: the evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, Stephen C. 1992. The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennant, Leanne E. & Sanford D. Porter. 1991. Comparison of diets of two fire ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): solid and liquid components. Journal of Entomological Science 26:450-465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschinkel, Walter R. 1987. Fire ant queen longevity and age: estimation by sperm depletion. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 80:263-266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschinkel, Walter R. 1993. The fire ant (Solenopsis invicta): still unvanquished. In: Biological pollution: the control and impact of invasive exotic species. McKnight, B.N. ed. Indiana Academy of Science Press. Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, Edward L. 1988. A bioassay for a primer pheromone of queen fire ants (Solenopsis invicta) which inhibits the production of sexuals. Insectes Sociaux 35:382-392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max 1958. The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Edward O. 1975. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Harvard University Press. Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, Amotz & Avishag Zahavi. 1997. The handicapped principle: a missing piece of Darwin’s puzzle. Oxford University Press, Pp. 286.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Science and Policy—Biology, University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, Florida, 33701, USA

    Deby Cassill

Authors
  1. Deby Cassill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cassill, D. Skew Selection: Nature Favors a Trickle-Down Distribution of Resources in Ants. Journal of Bioeconomics 5, 83–96 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025823409334

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025823409334

Search

Navigation