Advertisement

Integrated Pest Management Reviews

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 29–45 | Cite as

Use of Frightening Devices in Wildlife Damage Management

  • Jason M. Gilsdorf
  • Scott E. Hygnstrom
  • Kurt C. VerCauteren
Article

Abstract

Wildlife is often responsible for causing extensive damage to personal property, human health and safety concerns, and other nuisance problems because of their feeding, roosting, breeding, and loafing habits. Frightening devices are tools used in integrated wildlife damage management to reduce the impacts of animals, but the effectiveness of such devices is often variable. An animal's visual and auditory capabilities affect how the animal will respond to a stimulus. Frightening devices include pyrotechnics, gas exploders, effigies, lights, lasers, reflective objects, guard animals, bioacoustics, and ultrasonic devices. We examined scientific literature on the use of frightening devices to reduce bird and mammal depredation and compiled results to determine the effectiveness of such devices. When used in an integrated system, frightening devices may be more effective than when used alone. We conclude that the total elimination of damage may be impossible, but frightening devices and/or combinations of devices are useful in reducing wildlife damage. Ultrasonic frightening devices are ineffective in repelling birds and mammals whereas other devices offer some protection. The timely use of a variety of frightening devices can be part of a cost-effective integrated system to reduce wildlife damage to tolerable levels.

frightening devices integrated pest management (IPM) non-lethal methods wildlife damage management 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aguilera, E., Knight, R.L. and Cummings, J.L. (1991) An evaluation of two hazing methods for urban Canada geese. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 19, 32–5.Google Scholar
  2. Ali, M.A. and Klyne, M.A. (1985) Vision in Vertebrates. New York, USA: Plenum Press, 272 p.Google Scholar
  3. Andelt, W.F. (1992) Effectiveness of livestock guarding dogs for reducing predation on domestic sheep. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 20, 55–62.Google Scholar
  4. Belant, J.L. (1997) Gulls in urban environments: Landscape-level management to reduce conflict. Landscape Urban Plann. 38, 245–58.Google Scholar
  5. Belant, J.L. and Ickes, S.K. (1997) Mylar flags as gull deterrents. Proc. Great Plains Wildl. Damage Control Workshop 13, 73–80.Google Scholar
  6. Belant, J.L., Seamans, T.W. and Dwyer, C.P. (1996) Evaluation of propane exploders as white-tailed deer deterrents. Crop Prot. 15, 575–8.Google Scholar
  7. Belant, J.L., Seamans, T.W. and Tyson, L.A. (1998a) Evaluation of electronic frightening devices as white-tailed deer deterrents. Vert. Pest Conf. 18, 107–10.Google Scholar
  8. Belant, J.L., Woronecki, P.P., Dolbeer, R.A. and Seamans, T.W. (1998b) Ineffectiveness of five commercial deterrents for nesting starlings. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 26, 264–8.Google Scholar
  9. Belant, J.L., Tyson, L.A. and Mastrangelo, P.A. (2000) Effects of lethal control at aquaculture facilities on populations of picivorous birds. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 28, 379–84.Google Scholar
  10. Bennett, A.T.D. and Cuthill, I.C. (1994) Ultraviolet vision in birds: What is its function. Vision Res. 34, 1471–8.Google Scholar
  11. Bergman, D.L., Pugh, T.L. and Huffman, L.E. (1997) Non-lethal control techniques used to manage blackbird damage to sunflower. Proc. Great PlainsDamage ControlWorkshop 13, 81–7.Google Scholar
  12. Berringer, J., Hansen, L.P., Heinen, R.A. and Giessman, N.F. (1994) Use of dogs to reduce damage by deer to a white pine plantation. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 22, 627–32.Google Scholar
  13. Blackwell, B.F., Bernhardt, G.E. and Dolbeer, R.A. (2002) Lasers as nonlethal avian repellents. J. Wildl. Manage. 66, 250–8.Google Scholar
  14. Bomford, M. and O'Brien, P.H. (1990) Sonic deterrents in animal damage control: A review of device tests and effectiveness. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 18, 411–22.Google Scholar
  15. Borg, E. (1982) Auditory threshold in rats of different age and strain. A behavioral and electrophysiological study. Hearing Res. 8, 101–15.Google Scholar
  16. Bowmaker, J.K., Heath, L.A., Wilkie, S.E. and Hunt, D.M. (1997) Visual pigments and oil droplets from six classes of photoreceptor in the retinas of birds. Vision Res. 37, 2183–94.Google Scholar
  17. Brown, T.L., Decker, D.J. and Dawson, C.P. (1978) Willingness of New York farmers to incur white-tailed deer damage. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 6, 235–9.Google Scholar
  18. Bruggers, R.L., Brooks, J.E., Dolbeer, R.A., Woronecki, P.P., Pandit, R.K., Tarimo, T., All-India Coordinated Research Project on Economic Ornithology and Hoque, M. (1986) Responses of pest birds to reflecting tape in agriculture. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 14, 161–70.Google Scholar
  19. Campbell III, E.W., Koehler, A.E., Sugihara, R.T. and Tobin, M.E. (1998) The development of an integrated pest management plan for roof rats in Hawaiian macadamia orchards. Vert. Pest Conf. 18, 171–5.Google Scholar
  20. Castelli, P.M. and Sleggs, S.E. (2000) Efficacy of border collies to control nuisance Canada geese.Wildl. Soc. Bull. 28, 385–92.Google Scholar
  21. Coffey, M.A. and Johnston, G.H. (1997) A planning process for managing white-tailed deer in protected areas: Integrated pest management. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 25, 433–9.Google Scholar
  22. Conover, M.R. (1984) Comparative effectiveness of avitrol, exploders, and hawk-kites in reducing blackbird damage to corn. J. Wildl. Manage. 48, 109–16.Google Scholar
  23. Conover, M.R. and Decker, D.J. (1991) Wildlife damage to crops: Perceptions of agricultural and wildlife professionals in 1957 and 1987. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 19, 46–52.Google Scholar
  24. Conover, M.R. and Dolbeer, R.A. (1989) Reflecting tapes fail to reduce blackbird damage to ripening cornfields. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 17, 441–3.Google Scholar
  25. Coppinger, R.J., Lorenz, J.R. and Coppinger, L. (1983) Introducing livestock guarding dogs to sheep and goat producers. Eastern Wildl. Damage Control Conf. 1, 129–32.Google Scholar
  26. Corwin, J.T. and Cotanche, D.A. (1988) Regeneration of sensory hair cells after acoustic trauma. Science 240, 1772–4.Google Scholar
  27. Cotanche, D.A. (1987) Regeneration of hair cell stereociliary bundles in the chick cochlea following severe acoustic trauma. Hearing Res. 30, 181–96.Google Scholar
  28. Craven, S.R. and Hygnstrom, S.E. (1994) Deer. In S.E. Hygnstrom, R.M. Timm and G.E. Larson (eds) Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage, pp. D25–40. Lincoln, NE, USA: University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension Service.Google Scholar
  29. Craven, S.R., Decker, D.J., Siemer, W.F. and Hygnstrom, S.E. (1992) Survey use and landowner tolerance in wildlife damage management. Trans. North Am. Wildl. Nat. Res. Conf. 57, 75–88.Google Scholar
  30. Cummings, J.L., Knittle, C.E. and Guarino, J.L. (1986) Evaluating a pop-up scarecrow coupled with a propane exploder for reducing blackbird damage to ripening sunflower. Vert. Pest Conf. 12, 286–91.Google Scholar
  31. Curtis, P.D., Smith, C.R. and Evans, W. (1995) Techniques for reducing bird use at Nanticok Landfill near E. A. Link Airport, Broom County, New York. Eastern Wildl. Damage Control Conf. 6, 67–78.Google Scholar
  32. Curtis, P.D., Fitzgerald, C. and Richmond, M.E. (1997) Evaluation of the yard gard ultrasonic yard protector for repelling white-tailed deer. Eastern Wildl. Damage Manage. Conf. 7, 172–6.Google Scholar
  33. Cuthill, I.C., Partridge, J.C., Bennett, A.T.D., Church, S.C., Hart, N.S. and Hunt, S. (2000) Ultraviolet vision in birds. Adv. Stud. Behav. 29, 159–214.Google Scholar
  34. Dalland, J.I. (1965) Hearing sensitivity in bats. Science 150, 1185–6.Google Scholar
  35. Dalland, J.I. (1970) The measurement of ultrasonic hearing. In W.C. Stebbins (ed.) Animal Psychophysics: The Design and Conduct of Sensory Experiments, pp. 21–40. New York, USA: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  36. DeNicola, A.J., VerCauteren, K.C., Curtis, P.D. and Hygnstrom, S.E. (2000) Managing white-tailed deer in suburban environments — a technical guide. Cornell Cooperative Extension. Ithaca, New York, USA: Media and Technology Services, Cornell University, p. 52.Google Scholar
  37. Dolbeer, R.A. (1990) Ornithology and integrated pest management: Red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus vn) and corn. IBIS 132, 309–22.Google Scholar
  38. Dolbeer, R.A. (1994) Blackbirds. In S.E. Hygnstrom, R.M. Timm and G.E. Larson (eds) Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage, pp. E25–32. Lincoln, NE, USA: University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension Service.Google Scholar
  39. Dolbeer, R.A. (1999) Overview and management of vertebrate pests. In J.R. Ruberson (ed.) Handbook of Pest Management, pp. 663–91. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.Google Scholar
  40. Dolbeer, R.A., Woronecki, P.P. and Bruggers, R.C. (1986) Reflecting tapes repel blackbirds from millet, sunflowers, and sweet corn. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 14, 418–25.Google Scholar
  41. Dolbeer, R.A., Belant, J.L. and Sillings, J.L. (1993) Shooting gulls reduces strikes with aircraft at John F. Kennedy International Airport. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 21, 442–50.Google Scholar
  42. Dolbeer, R.A., Wright, S.E. and Cleary, E.C. (2000) Ranking the hazard level of wildlife species to aviation.Wildl. Soc. Bull. 28, 372–8.Google Scholar
  43. Dooling, R.J. (1980) Behavior and psychophysics of hearing in birds. In A.N. Popper and R.R. Fay (eds) Comparative Studies of Hearing in Vertebrates, pp. 261–88. New York, USA: Springer-Verlag New York Inc.Google Scholar
  44. Dooling, R.J., Lohr,B. and Dent, M.L. (2000) Hearing in birds and reptiles. In R.J. Dooling, R.R. Fay and A.N. Popper (eds) Comparative Hearing: Birds and Reptiles, pp. 308–59. New York, USA: Springer-Verlag New York Inc.Google Scholar
  45. Durrant, J.D. and Lovrinic, J.H. (1984) In: J.P. Butler (ed.) Bases of Hearing Science, 2nd edn, p. 276. Baltimore, Maryland, USA: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  46. Ehret, G. (1983) Psychoacoustics. In J.F. Willott (ed.) The Auditory Psychobiology of the Mouse, pp. 13–56. Springfield, IL, USA: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  47. Engeman, R.M. and Witmer, G.W. (2000) Integrated management tactics for predicting and alleviating pocket gopher (Thomomys vnspp.) damage to conifer reforestation plantings. Integr. Pest Manage. Rev. 5, 41–55.Google Scholar
  48. Erickson, W.A., Marsh, R.E. and Salmon, T.P. (1990) A review of falconry as a bird-hazing technique. Vert. Pest Conf. 14, 314–16.Google Scholar
  49. Fagerstone, K.A. and Clay, W.H. (1997) Overview of USDA Animal Damage Control efforts to manage overabundant deer. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 25, 413–17.Google Scholar
  50. Fall, M.W. and Jackson, W.B. (2000) Future technology for managing problems with vertebrate pest and over-abundant wildlife — introduction. Int. Biodet. Biodegra. 45, 93–5.Google Scholar
  51. Fay, R.R. (1988) Hearing in Vertebrates: A Psychophysics Databook, Winnetka, Illinois, USA, Hill-Fay Associates, 621 p.Google Scholar
  52. Forschungsgemeinschaft, D. (2000) Auditory worlds: Sensory analysis and perception in animals and man. In G.A. Manley, H. Fastl, M. Kössl, H. Oeckinghaus and G. Klump (eds) Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH (Federal Republic of Germany), 359 pp.Google Scholar
  53. Frings, H. (1964) Sound in vertebrate pest control. Vert. Pest Conf. 2, 50–6.Google Scholar
  54. Gerken, G.M., Saunders, S.S., Simhadri-Sumithra, R. and Bhat, K.H.V. (1985) Behavioral thresholds for electrical stimulation applied to auditory brainstem nuclei in cat are altered by injurious and noninjurious sound. Hearing Res. 20, 221–31.Google Scholar
  55. Glahn, J.F., Ellis, G., Fioranelli, P. and Dorr, B.S. (2001) Evaluation of moderate and low-powered lasers for dispersing doublecrested cormorants form their night roosts. Proc. Ninth Wildl. Damage Manage. Conf. 9, 30–45.Google Scholar
  56. Godin, A.J. (1994) Birds at airports. In S.E. Hygnstrom, R.M. Timm and G.E. Larson (eds) Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage, pp. E1–4. Lincoln, NE, USA: University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension Service.Google Scholar
  57. Gorenzel, W.P. and Salmon, T.P. (1993) Tape-recorded calls disperse American crows from urban roosts. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 21, 334–8.Google Scholar
  58. Green, D., Askins, G.R. and West, P.D. (1997) Public opinion: Obstacle or aid to sound deer management. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 25, 367–70.Google Scholar
  59. Green, J.S. (1989a) Animal and plant health inspection service — animal damage control livestock guarding dog program. Proc. Great Plains Wildl. Damage Control Workshop 9, 50–3.Google Scholar
  60. Green, J.S. (1989b) Donkeys for predation control. EasternWildl. Damage Control Conf. 4, 83–6.Google Scholar
  61. Green, J.S. and Woodruff, R.A. (1983) The use of Eurasian dogs to protect sheep from predator in North America:Asummary of research at the United States Department of Agriculture Sheep Experiment Station. Eastern Wildl. Damage Control Conf. 1, 119–24.Google Scholar
  62. Green, J.S., Woodruff, R.A. and Tueller, T.T. (1984) Livestock guarding dogs for predator control: Costs, benefits, and practicality. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 12, 44–50.Google Scholar
  63. Green, J.S., Henderson, F.R. and Collinge, M.D. (1994) Coyotes. In S.E. Hygnstrom, R.M. Timm and G.E. Larson (eds) Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage, pp. C51–76. Lincoln, NE, USA: University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension Service.Google Scholar
  64. Hart, N.S., Partridge, J.C. and Cuthill, I.C. (1998) Visual pigments, oil droplets, and cone photoreceptor distribution in the European Starling (Sturnus vuglaris). J. Exp. Biol. 201, 1433–46.Google Scholar
  65. Heffner, R.S. and Heffner, H.E. (1982) Hearing in the elephant (Elaphus maximus): Absolute sensitivity, frequency discrimination and sound localization. J. Comp. Psychol. 96, 926–44.Google Scholar
  66. Heffner, R.S. and Heffner, H.E. (1985) Hearing in mammals: The least weasel. J. Mammal. 66, 745–55.Google Scholar
  67. Hunt, S., Cuthill, I.C., Bennett, A.T.D., Church, S.C. and artridge, J.C. (2001) Is the ultraviolet waveband a special communication channel in avian mate choice. J. Exp. Biol. 204, 2499–507.Google Scholar
  68. Hygnstrom, S.E., Hygnstrom, J.R., VerCauteren, K.C., Foster, N.S., Lembezeder, S.B. and Hafer, D.J. (1992) Effects of chronological deer damage on corn yields. Eastern Wildl. Damage Control Conf. 5, 65.Google Scholar
  69. Jacobs, G.H. (1981) Comparative Color Vision, New York, USA: Academic Press Inc., 209 p.Google Scholar
  70. Jacobs, G.H. (1992) Ultraviolet vision in vertebrates. American Zoologist 32, 544–54.Google Scholar
  71. Jacobs, G.H., Neitz, J. and Deegan, II, J.F. (1991) Retinal receptors in rodents maximally sensitive to ultraviolet light. Nature 353, 655–6.Google Scholar
  72. Jacobs, G.H., Deegan II, J.F., Neitz, J., Murphy, B.P., Miller, K.V. and Marchinton, R.L. (1994) Electrophysiological measurements of spectral mechanisms in the retinas of two cervids: White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and the fallow deer (Dama dama). J. Comp. Physiol. A174, 551–7.Google Scholar
  73. Johnson, R.J., Cole, P.H. and Stroup, W.W. (1985) Starling Response to three auditory stimuli. J.Wildl.Manage. 49, 620–5.Google Scholar
  74. Jones, J.M. and Witham, J.H. (1995) Urban deer ‘problem’ solving in Northeast Illinois: An overview. In J.B. McAninch (ed.) Urban deer: A manageable resource? Proc. Symp. 55th Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conf., pp. 58–65. 12–14 December 1993, North Central Section of TheWildlife Society, St. Louis, MO, USA.Google Scholar
  75. Kevan, P.G., Chittka, L. and Dyer, A.G. (2001) Limits to the salience of ultraviolet: Lessons from colour vision in bees and birds. J. Exp. Biol. 204, 2571–80.Google Scholar
  76. Kilpatrick, H.J., Spohr, S.M. and Chasko, G.C. (1997) A controlled deer hunt on a state-owned coastal reserve in Connecticut: Controversies, strategies, and results. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 25, 451–6.Google Scholar
  77. Knittle, C.E., Cummings, J.L., Linz, G.M. and Besser, J.F. (1988) An evaluation of modified 4-aminopyridine baits for protecting sunflower from blackbird damage. Vert. Pest Conf. 13, 248–53.Google Scholar
  78. Knowlton, F.F., Gese, E.M. and Jaeger, M.M. (1999) Coyote depredation control: An interface between biology and management. J. Range Manage. 52, 398–412.Google Scholar
  79. Koehler, A.E., Marsh, R.E. and Salmon, T.P. (1990) Frightening methods and devices/stimuli to prevent mammal damage — a review. Vert. Pest Conf. 14, 168–73.Google Scholar
  80. Kreithen, M.L. and Quine, D.B. (1979) Infrasound detection by the homing pigeon: A behavioral audiogram. J. Comp. Physiol. 129, 1–4.Google Scholar
  81. Kuser, J. (1995) Deer and people in Princeton, New Jersey, 1971–1993. In J.B. McAninch (ed.) Urban Deer: A Manageable Resource? Proc. Symp. 55th Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conf., pp. 47–50. 12–14 December 1993, North Central Section of The Wildlife Society, St. Louis, MO, USA.Google Scholar
  82. Langemann, U., Hamann, I. and Frieb, A. (1999) A behavioral test of presbycusis in the bird auditory system. Hearing Res. 137, 68–76.Google Scholar
  83. Linhart, S.B. (1981) Managing coyote damage problems with non-lethal techniques: Recent advances in research. Eastern Wildl. Damage Control Conf. 1, 105–18.Google Scholar
  84. Linhart, S.B., Dasch, G.J., Johnson, R.R., Roberts, J.D. and Packham, C.J. (1992) Electric frightening devices for reducing coyote depredation on domestic sheep: Efficacy under range conditions and operational use. Vert. Pest Conf. 15, 386–92.Google Scholar
  85. Loker, C.A., Decker, D.J. and Schwager, S.J. (1999) Social acceptability of wildlife management action in suburban areas: 3 cases from New York. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 27, 152–9.Google Scholar
  86. Long, G.L. and Schnitzler, H.U. (1975) Behavioural audiograms for the bat Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. J. Comp. Physiol. 100, 211–19.Google Scholar
  87. Marchinton, R.L. and Hirth, D.H. (1984) Behavior. In L.K. Halls (ed.) White-Tailed Deer: Ecology and Management, pp. 129–68. Harrisburg, PA, USA: Stackpole Books.Google Scholar
  88. Mason, J.R., Clark, L. and Bean, N.J. (1993) White plastic flags repel snowgeese (Chen caerulescens). Crop Prot. 12, 497–500.Google Scholar
  89. Mastrangelo, P.C., Sloan, C. and Bruce, K. (1996) Incorporating depredation permits into integrated damage management plans for aquaculture facilities. Eastern Wildl. Damage Manage. Conf. 7, 36–43.Google Scholar
  90. Mayer, K.E., DiDonato, J.E. and McCullough, D.R. (1995) California urban deer management: Two case studies. In J.B. McAninch (ed.) Urban Deer: A Manageable Resource? Proc. Symp. 55th Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conf., pp. 51–57. 12–14 December 1993, North Central Section of The Wildlife Society, St. Louis, MO, USA.Google Scholar
  91. McIlwain, J.T. (1996) An Introduction to the Biology of Vision. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press, 222 p.Google Scholar
  92. Meadows, L.E. and Knowlton, F.F. (2000) Efficacy of guard llamas to reduce canine predation on domestic sheep. Wildl. Soc. Bulle. 28, 614–22.Google Scholar
  93. Montoney, A.J. and Boggs, H.C. (1995) Effects of a bird hazard reduction force on reducing bird/aircraft strike hazards at the Atlantic City International Airport, NJ. EasternWildl. Damage Control Conf. 6, 59–66.Google Scholar
  94. Mott, D.F. and Timbrook, S.K. (1988) Alleviating nuisance Canada goose problems with acoustical stimuli.Vert.Pest Conf. 13, 301–4.Google Scholar
  95. Mott, D.F., Glahn, J.F., Smith, P.L., Reinhold, D.S., Bruce, K.J. and Sloan, C.A. (1998) An evaluation of winter roost harassment for dispersing double-crested cormorants away from catfish production areas in Mississippi. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 26, 584–91.Google Scholar
  96. Murua, R. and Rodriguez, J. (1989) An integrated control system for rodents in pine plantations in central Chile. J. Appl. Ecol. 26, 81–8.Google Scholar
  97. Nolte, D.L. (1999) Behavioral approaches for limiting depredating by wild ungulates. In K.L. Launchbaugh, K.D. Sanders and J.C. Mosley (eds) Grazing Behavior of Livestock and Wildlife, pp. 60–70. Idaho Forest, Wildlife and Range. State Bulletin #70. University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.Google Scholar
  98. Reiter, D.K., Brunson, M.W. and Schmidt, R.H. (1999) Public attitudes toward wildlife damage management and policy. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 27, 746–58.Google Scholar
  99. Sauer, P.R. (1984) Physical characteristics. In L.K. Halls (ed.) White-Tailed Deer: Ecology and Management, pp. 73–90. Harrisburg, PA, USA: Stackpole BooksGoogle Scholar
  100. Schmidt, R.H. and Johnson, R.J. (1983) Bird dispersal recordings: an overview. In D.E. Kaukeinen (ed.) Vertebrate pest control and management materials. American Society for Testing and Materials Special Technical Publication 817, Vol. 4, pp. 43–65. Philadelphia, PA, USA.Google Scholar
  101. Scott, J.D. and Townsend, T.W. (1985) Methods used by selected Ohio growers to control damage by deer. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 13, 234–40.Google Scholar
  102. Shumake, S.A., Kolz, A.L., Crane, K.A. and Johnson, R.E. (1982) Variables affecting ultrasound repellency in Philippine rats. J. Wildl. Manage. 46, 148–55.Google Scholar
  103. Smythe, R.H. (1975)Vision in the AnimalWorld, NewYork, USA: The Macmillan Press Ltd., p. 165.Google Scholar
  104. Spalinger, D.E., Cooper, S.M., Martin, D.J. and Shipley, L.A. (1997) Is social learning an important influence on foraging behavior in white-tailed deer? J. Wildl. Manage. 61, 611–21.Google Scholar
  105. Sprock, C.M., Howard, W.E. and Jacob, F.C. (1967) Sound as a deterrent to rats and mice. J. Wildl. Manage. 31, 729–41.Google Scholar
  106. Stebbins, W.C. (1983) The Acoustic Sense of Animals, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Harvard University Press., 168 p.Google Scholar
  107. Stevens, G.R., Rogue, J., Weber, R. and Clark, L. (2000) Evaluation of a radar-activated, demand-performance bird hazing system. Int. Biodet. Biodegrad. 45, 129–37.Google Scholar
  108. Stickley, A.R. Jr. and King, J.O. (1995) Long-term trial of an inflatable effigy scare device for repelling cormorants from catfish ponds. Eastern Wildl. Damage Control Conf. 6, 89–92.Google Scholar
  109. Stickley, A.R. Jr., Mitchell, R.T., Seubert, J.O., Ingram, C.R. and Dyer, M.I. (1976) Large-scale evaluation of blackbird frightening agent 4-aminopyridine in corn. J. Wildl. Manage. 40, 126–31.Google Scholar
  110. Thomas, G.J. (1972) A review of gull damage and management methods at nature reserves. Biol. Conserv. 4, 117–27.Google Scholar
  111. Thompson, R.D., Grant, C.V., Pearson, E.W. and Corner, G.W. (1968a) Cardiac response of starlings to sound: Effects of lighting and grouping. Am. J. Physiol. 214, 41–4.Google Scholar
  112. Thompson, R.D., Grant, C.V., Pearson, E.W. and Corner, G.W. (1968b) Differential heart rate response to starlings to sound stimuli of biological origin. J. Wildl. Manage. 32, 888–93.Google Scholar
  113. Timm, R.M. (1994a) House Mice. In S.E. Hygnstrom, R.M. Timm and G.E. Larson (eds) Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage, pp. B31–46. Lincoln, NE, USA: University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension Service.Google Scholar
  114. Timm, R.M. (1994b) Norway Rats. In S.E. Hygnstrom, R.M. Timm and G.E. Larson (eds) Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage, pp. B105–20. Lincoln, NE, USA: University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension Service.Google Scholar
  115. Timm, R.M. (1994c) Avitrol. In S.E. Hygnstrom, R.M. Timm and G.E. Larson (eds) Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage, pp. G23–61. Lincoln, NE, USA: University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension Service.Google Scholar
  116. Tobin, M.E. (1998) Research and management of bird depredations at catfish farms. Vert. Pest Conf. 18, 67–70.Google Scholar
  117. Tobin, M.E., Woronecki, P.P., Dolbeer, R.A. and Bruggers, R.L. (1988) Reflecting tape fails to protect ripening blueberries from bird damage. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 16, 300–3.Google Scholar
  118. Van Tassel, L.W., Phillips, C. and Yang, B. (1999) Depredation claim settlement in Wyoming. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 27, 479–87.Google Scholar
  119. VerCauteren, K.C. and Hygnstrom, S.E. (1998) Effects of agricultural activities and hunting on home ranges of female whitetailed deer. J. Wildl. Manage. 62, 280–5.Google Scholar
  120. Wade, D.A. (1983) Coyotes. In R.M. Timm (ed.) Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage, pp. C31–41. Lincoln, NE, USA: Great Plains Agricultural Council, Wildlife Resources Committee, and University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension Service.Google Scholar
  121. Walton, M.T. and Feild, C.A. (1989) Use of donkeys to guard sheep and goats in Texas. EasternWildl. Damage Control Conf. 4, 87–94.Google Scholar
  122. Whisson, D.A. and Takekawa, J.Y. (2000) Testing the effectiveness of an aquatic hazing device on waterbirds in the San Francisco Bay Estuary of California.Waterbirds 23, 56–63.Google Scholar
  123. Woronecki, P.P. (1988) Effect of ultrasonic, visual, and sonic devices on pigeon numbers in a vacant building. Vert. Pest Conf. 13, 266–72.Google Scholar
  124. Wright, E.N. (1982) Bird problems and their solution in Britain. Vert. Pest Conf. 10, 186–9.Google Scholar
  125. Wright, S.E., Dolbeer, R.A. and Montoney, A.J. (1998) Deer on airports: An accident waiting to happen. Vert. Pest Conf. 18, 90–5.Google Scholar
  126. Wywialowski, A.P. and Beach, R.H. (1992) Agricultural producer's estimates of wildlife causing damage in eastern states. Eastern Wildl. Damage Control Conf. 5, 66.Google Scholar
  127. Yodlowski, M.L., Kreithen, M.L. and Keeton, W.T. (1977) Detection of atmospheric infrasound by homing pigeons. Nature 265, 725–6.Google Scholar
  128. Yokoyama, S. (1999) Molecular bases of color vision in vertebrates. Genes Genetic. Syst. 74, 189–99.Google Scholar
  129. Yokoyama, S. and Radlwimmer, F.B. (1998) The ‘five-sites’ rule and the evolution of red green color vision in mammals. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 560–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason M. Gilsdorf
    • 1
  • Scott E. Hygnstrom
    • 1
  • Kurt C. VerCauteren
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Natural Resource SciencesUniversity of NebraskaLincolnU.S.A.
  2. 2.USDA/APHIS/Wildlife ServicesNational Wildlife Research CenterFort CollinsU.S.A

Personalised recommendations