Abstract
Research studying the public's attitudes toward capital punishment has typically assessed whether individuals favor or oppose the use of the death penalty, without examining the underlying structure of these attitudes. The present study used a general model of attitude to examine the relative importance of affective information (i.e., feelings) and cognitive information (i.e., beliefs) in predicting attitudes toward capital punishment. Open-ended elicitation measures were used to determine the particular feelings and beliefs respondents most frequently associated with the issue. Participants also reported their attitude (i.e., overall evaluation) toward the issue. The results revealed that: (a) even the most frequently elicited responses were provided by a minority of respondents, (b) overall, both affective and cognitive information were important in predicting attitudes toward capital punishment, and (c) the relative importance of affective and cognitive information in predicting attitudes differed as a function of individual differences in attitude structure. The implications of the results for future research are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Ajzen, I., & Fishhein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bowers, W. J. (1993). Capital punishment and contemporary values: People's misgivings and the court's misperceptions. Law and Society Review, 27, 157–175.
Breckler, S. J. (1984). Validation of affect, cognition, and behavior as distinct components of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1191–1205.
Costanzo, M., & White, L. T. (1994). An overview of the death penalty and capital trials: History, current status, legal procedures, and cost. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 1–18.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Edwards, K. (1990). The interplay of affect and cognition in attitude formation and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 202–216.
Ellsworth, P. C., & Gross, S. R. (1994). Hardening of the attitudes: Americans' views on the death penalty. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19–52.
Ellsworth, P. C., & Ross, L. (1983). Public opinion and capital punishment: A close examination of the views of abolitionists and retentionists. Crime and Delinquency, 29, 116–169.
Esses, V. M., Haddock, G., & Zanna, M. P. (1993). Values, stereotypes, and emotions as determinants of intergroup attitudes. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes on group perception (pp. 37–166). CA: San Diego: Academic Press.
Haddock, G. (1994). Investigating the existence of individual differences in attitude structure. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Waterloo, Canada.
Haddock, G., & Zanna, M. P. (in press). On the use of open-ended measures to assess attitudinal components. British Journal of Social Psychology.
Larsen, R. J., & Diener, E. (1993). Problems and promises with the circumflex model of emotion. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Representative research in social psychology: Emotion (Vol. 13, pp. 25–59). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior attitudes on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109.
MacKenzie, H. (1987, July 13). Hard choices. Maclean's, 100, 6–7.
McGarrell, E. F., & Sandys, M. (1996). The misperception of public opinion toward capital punishment. American Behavioral Scientist, 39, 500–513.
Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values: A theory of organization and change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sears, D. O. (1988). Symbolic racism. In P. A. Katz & D. A. Taylor (Eds.), Eliminating racism (pp. 53–84). New York: Plenum Press.
Stangor, C., Sullivan, L. A., & Ford, T. E. (1991). Affective and cognitive determinants of prejudice. Social Cognition, 9, 359–381.
Tyler, T. R., & Weber, R. (1982). Support for the death penalty: Instrumental response to crime, or symbolic attitude? Law and Society Review, 17, 21–45.
Vidmar, N. (1974). Retributive and utilitarian motives and other correlates of Canadian attitudes toward the death penalty. Canadian Psychologist, 15, 337–347.
Zanna, M. P., & Rempel, J. K. (1988). Attitudes: A new look at an old concept. In D. BarTal & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), The social psychology of knowledge (pp. 315–334). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Haddock, G., Zanna, M.P. Assessing the Impact of Affective and Cognitive Information in Predicting Attitudes toward Capital Punishment. Law Hum Behav 22, 325–339 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025758623612
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025758623612