Abstract
The present study was designed to examine effects of closed-circuit technology on children's testimony and jurors' perceptions of child witnesses. For the study, a series of elaborately staged mock trials was held. First, 5- to 6-year-old and 8- to 9-year-old children individually participated in a play session with an unfamiliar male confederate. Approximately 2 weeks later, children individually testified about the event at a downtown city courtroom. Mock juries composed of community recruits viewed the trials, with the child's testimony presented either live in open court or over closed-circuit television. Mock jurors made ratings concerning the child witness and the defendant, and deliberated to reach a verdict. Results indicated that overall, older children were more accurate witnesses than younger children. However, older, not younger children produced more inaccurate information in free recall. Compared to live testimony in open court, use of closed-circuit technology led to decreased suggestibility for younger children. Testifying in open court was also associated with children experiencing greater pretrial anxiety. Closed-circuit technology did not diminish factfinders' abilities to discriminate accurate from inaccurate child testimony, nor did it directly bias jurors against the defendant. However, closed-circuit testimony biased jurors against child witnesses. Moreover, jurors tended to base their impressions of witness credibility on perceived confidence and consistency. Implications for the use of closed- circuit technology when children testify are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. (1983). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist and Revised Child Behavior Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
Batterman-Faunce, J. M. (1993). Closed-circuit versus open courtroom testimony: Effects on the accuracy and suggestibility of child witnesses. Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo, NY.
Berliner, L., & Conte, J. R. (1995). The effects of disclosure and intervention on sexually abused children. Child Abuse and Neglect, 19, 371–384.
Bottoms, B. L. (1993). Individual differences in perceptions of child sexual assault victims. In G. S. Goodman & B. L. Bottoms (Eds.), Child victims, child witnesses (pp. 229–262). New York: Guilford Press.
Bottoms, B. L., & Goodman, G. S. (1994). Perceptions of children's credibility in sexual assault cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 702–732.
Buffalo News. (1989)....
Bussey, K., Lee, K., & Grimbeek, E. (1993). Lies and secrets: Implications for children's reporting of sexual abuse. In G. S. Goodman & B. L. Bottoms (Eds.), Child victims, child witnesses (pp. 147–168). New York: Guilford Press.
Carter, C., Bottoms, B. L., & Levine, M. (1996). Linguistic and socio-emotional influences on the accuracy of children's reports. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 335–358; Correction, 20, 579.
Cashmore, J. (1992). The use of closed-circuit television for child witnesses in the ACT, Sydney, Australia: Australian Law Reform Committee.
Coy v. Iowa, 56 USLW 4931 (1988).
Davies, G., & Noon, E. (1991). An evaluation of the live link for child witnesses. London: Home Office.
Dent, H. (1977). Stress as a factor influencing person recognition in identification parades. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 30, 339–340.
Duggan, L. M., Aubrey, M. Doherty, E., Isquith, P., Levine, M., & Scheiner, J. (1989). The credibility of children as witnesses in a simulated child sex abuse trial. In S. Ceci, D. Ross, & M. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on the child witness (pp. 71–99). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M., (1981). Manual for the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
Flin, R. H., Stevenson, Y., & Davies, G. M. (1989). Children's knowledge of court proceedings. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 285–297.
Goodman, G. S., Bottoms, B., Herscovici, B. B., & Shaver, P. (1989). Determinants of the child victim's perceived credibility. In S. Ceci, D. Ross, & M. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on children's testimany (pp. 1–22). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Goodman, G. S., Bottoms, B., Schwartz-Kenny, B., & Rudy, L. (1991). Children's testimony about a stressful event: Improving children's reports. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 69–99.
Goodman, G. S., Golding, J., & Haith, M. M. (1984). Jurors' reactions to child witnesses. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 139–156.
Goodman, G. S., Golding, J., Helgeson, V., Haith, M. M., & Michelli, J. (1987). When a child takes the stand: Jurors' perceptions of children's eyewitness testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 27–40.
Goodman, G. S., Levine, M., Melton, G. B., & Ogden, D. (1991). Craig v. Maryland. Amicus Brief to the US Supreme Court on behalf of the American Psychological Association, Law and Human Behavior, 15, 13–30.
Goodman, G. S., Pyle-Taub, E., Jones, D. P. H., England, P., Port, L. P., Rudy, L., & Prado, L. (1992). Emotional effects of criminal court testimony on child sexual assault victims. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57 (Serial No. 229).
Harter, S., & Pike, R. (1984). The pictorial scale of perceived competence and social acceptance for young children. Child Development, 55, 1969–1982.
Hill, P., & Hill, S. (1987). Videotaping children's testimony: An empirical view. Michigan Law Review, 85, 809–833.
Kerr, N. (1981). Social transition schemes: Charting the group's road to agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 684–702.
Leippe, M. R., Manion, A. P., & Romanczyk, A. (1992). Eyewitness persuasion: How and how well do fact finders judge the accuracy of adults' and children's memory reports? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 181–197.
Leippe, M. R., Manion, A. P., & Romanczyk, A. (1993). Discernability or discrimination? Understanding jurors' reactions to accurate and inaccurate child and adult witnesses. In G. S. Goodman & B. Bottoms (Eds.), Understanding and improving children's eyewitness testimony. New York: Guilford Press.
Leippe, M. R., & Romanczyk, A. (1987). Children on the witness stand: A communication/persuasion analysis of jurors' reactions to child witnesses. In S. J. Ceci, M. P. Toglia, & D. F. Ross (Eds.), Children's eyewitness memory (pp. 155–177). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Leippe, M. R., & Romanczyk, A. (1989). Reactions to child (versus adult) eyewitnesses: The influence of jurors' preconceptions and witness behavior. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 103–132.
Levinson, D. J., & Huffman, P. E. (1955). Traditional family ideology and its relation to personality. Journal of Personality, 23, 251–274.
Limber, S. P., & Castrianno, L. M. (1990, August). Lay persons' perceptions of sexually abused children. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.
Luss, C. A., & Wells, G. L. (1992). The perceived credibility of child eyewitnesses. In H. Dent & R. Flin (Eds.), Children as witnesses (pp. 73–92). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Maryland v. Craig, 47 CrL 2258 US SupCt (1990).
MacFarlane, K. (1992). Children's court school. Colloquium, SUNY-Buffalo, NY.
MacFarlane, K. (1985). Diagnostic evaluations and the use of videotapes in child sexual abuse cases. University of Miami Law Review, 40, 135–165.
Moston, S., & Engelberg, T. (1992). The effects of social support on children's eyewitness testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 61–75.
Murray, K. (1995). Live television link: An evaluation of its use by child witnesses in Scottish criminal trials. Scottish Office: Central Research Unit.
Myers, J. E. B. (1992). Evidence in child abuse and neglect cases: Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
National Center for the Prosecution of Child Abuse (1995). Child witnesses: The use of closed-circuit television testimony. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Nightingale, N. (1993). Juror reactions to child victim witnesses: Factors affecting trial outcome. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 679–694.
Orcutt, H. (1995). Detecting deception: Factfinders' abilities to assess the truth. Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo, NY.
Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (2nd. ed.). Chicago: Holt, Reinhart, and Winston.
Peters, D. (1990, March). Confrontational stress and children's testimony: Some experimental findings. In S. Ceci (Chair), Do children lie? Narrowing the uncertainties. Symposium presented at the American Psychology and Law Society Meetings, Williamsburg, VA.
Quas, J., DeCicco, V., Bulkley, J., & Goodman, G. S. (1996). District attorneys' views of innovative practices for child witnesses. APLS Newsletter, 16, 5–8.
Rosenthal, R. (1995). State of New Jersey v. Margaret Kelly Michaels: An overview. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 246–271.
Ross, D. F., Hopkins, S., Hanson, E., Lindsay, R. C. L., Hazen, K., & Eslinger, T. (1994). The impact of protective shields and videotape testimony on conviction rates in a simulated trial of child sexual abuse. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 553–566.
Rutter, M., (1993). Stress, coping, and development: Some issues and some questions. In N. Garmezy & M. Rutter (Eds.), Stress, coping, and development in children (pp. 1–41). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sas, L. (1991). Reducing the system-induced trauma for child sexual abuse victims through court preparation, assessment, and follow-up. Ontario, Canada: London Family Court Clinic.
Saywitz, K. J., Jaenicke, C., & Camparo, L. (1990). Children's knowledge of legal terminology. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 523–535.
Saywitz, K. J., & Nathanson, R. (1993). Children's testimony and their perceptions of stress in and out of the courtroom. Child Abuse and Neglect, 17, 613–622.
Schmidt, C., & Brigham, J. (1996). Jurors' perceptions of child victim-witnesses in a simulated sexual abuse trial. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 581–606.
Spencer, J. R., & Flin, R. (1990). The evidence of children: The law and the psychology. London: Blackstone.
Spielberger, C. D. (1973). Preliminary manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (“How I Feel” questionnaire). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Swim, J., Borgida, E., & McCoy, K. (1993). Videotaped versus in-court witness testimony: Does protecting the child witness jeopardize due process? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 603–631.
Tobey, A., & Goodman, G. S. (1992). Children's eyewitness memory: Effects of participation and forensic context. Child Abuse and Neglect, 16, 779–796.
Tobey, A. E., Goodman, G. S., Batterman-Faunce, J. M., Orcutt, H. K., Sachsenmaier, T. (1995). Balancing the rights of children and defendants: Effects of closed-circuit television on children's accuracy and jurors' perceptions. In M. S. Zaragoza, J. R. Graham, G. C. Hall, R. Hirschman, & Y. S. Ben-Porath (Eds.), Memory and testimony in the child witness (pp. 214–239). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Warren-Leubecker, A., Tate, C. S., Hinton, I. D., & Ozbek, I. N. (1989). What do children know about the legal system and when do they know it? First steps down a less traveled path in child witness research. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on children's testimony (pp. 131–157). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Wells, G. L., Turtle, J. W., & Luss, C. A. E. (1989). The perceived credibility of child eyewitnesses: What happens when they use theur own words? In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on the child witness (pp. 23–46). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Whitcomb, D., Runyan, D., De Vos, E., Hunter, W. M., Cross, T., Everson, M., Peeler, N., Porter, C., Toth, P., & Cropper, C. (1991). “Child victim as witness” research and development program. Final report to the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, U.S. Department of Justice.
Whitcomb, D., Shapiro, E., & Stellwagen, L. (1985). When the victim is a child: Issues for judges and prosecutors. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Goodman, G.S., Tobey, A.E., Batterman-Faunce, J.M. et al. Face-to-Face Confrontation: Effects of Closed-Circuit Technology on Children's Eyewitness Testimony and Jurors' Decisions. Law Hum Behav 22, 165–203 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025742119977
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025742119977