Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Terminological Problems in Information Retrieval

  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is the first in the series of the papers on an application of the systems analytic approach to evaluation of information retrieval (IR). At the beginning, the importance of consistent terminology in information retrieval is discussed, and different definitions of “information retrieval” and “IR system” are presented. The importance of identifying boundaries of the IR system for clarifying terminological differences is discussed. The terminological problems in IR are summarized, and some of the existing approaches to their solution are identified. A historical overview of IR research is presented in order to explain the existing terminological differences and to create a common basis for a discussion of evaluation approaches to IR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Cleverdon, C. W., The significance of the Cranfield tests on index languages. ACM SIGIR'91, pp. 3–12, 1991.

  2. Salton, G., and McGill, M. J., Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Salton, G., The state of retrieval system evaluation. IPM 28(4):441–449, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lancaster, F. W., and Warner, A. J., Information Retrieval Today, Information Resources Press, Arlington, VA, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hersh, W. R., Information Retrieval: A Health Care Perspective, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wilson, P., Situational relevance. ISR 9:457–471, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Swanson, D. R., Information retrieval as a trial-and-error process. LQ 47:128–148, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fidel, R., and Soergel, D., Factors affecting online bibliographic retrieval: A conceptual framework for research. JASIS 34(3):163–180, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Belkin, N. J., Cognitive models and information retrieval. Soc. Sci. Inf. Stud. 4:111–129, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Meadow, C. T., Problems of information science research–An opinion paper. Can. J. Inform. Sci. 11:18–23, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cuadra, C. A., and Katter, R. V., Experimental Studies of Relevance Judgments. Vol. I: Project Summary. Final Report, System Development Corp. Santa Monica, CA, 1967. Report No. TM-3520/001/00.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cuadra, C. A., and Katter, R. V., Opening the black box of “relevance.” JD 23(4):291–303, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lesk, M. E., and Salton, G., Relevance assessments and retrieval system evaluation. ISR 4:343–359, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Saracevic, T., The concept of “relevance” in information science: A historical review. In Saracevic, T., (ed.), Introduction to Information Science, R. R. Bowker, New York, pp. 111–151, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Harter, S. P., The Cranfield II relevance assessments: A critical evaluation. LQ 41:229–243, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Saracevic, T., Relevance: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science. JASIS 26:321–343, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Meadow, C. T., ‘Relevance?’. JASIS 36:354–355, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Swanson, D. R., Subjective versus objective relevance in bibliographic retrieval systems. LQ 56:389–398, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eisenberg, M. B., and Schamber, L., Relevance: The search for a definition. ASIS Proceedings. 1988, Atlanta, GA, pp. 164–168.

  20. Schamber, L., Eisenberg, M. B., and Nilan, M. S., A re-examination of relevance: Toward a dynamic, situational definition. IPM 26:755–776, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Harter, S. P., Psychological relevance and information science. JASIS 43:602–615, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  22. FroehlichT. J., Relevance reconsidered—Towards an agenda for the 21st century: Introduction to special topic issue on relevance Research. JASIS 45(3):124–134, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hersh, W., Relevance and retrieval evaluation: Perspectives from medicine. JASIS 45(3):201–206, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schamber, L., Relevance and information behavior. ARIST, p. 3–48, 1994.

  25. Mizzaro S., Relevance: The whole history. JASIS 48(9):810–832, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fidel, R., and Crandall, M., Users' perception of the performance of a filtering system. SIGIR 198–205, 1997.

  27. Belkin, N. J., Oddy, R. N., and Brooks, H. M., ASK for information retrieval: Part I. Background and theory. Part II. Results of design study. JD 38:6171, 145–164, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Robertson, S. E., and Hancock-Beaulieu, M. M., On the evaluation of IR systems. IPM 28(4):457–466, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tague-Sutcliffe, J. M., The pragmatics of information retrieval experimentation, revisited. IPM 28(4):467–490, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ogden, C. K., and Richards, I. A., The Meaning of Meaning, 8th edn., Harcourt, Brace and World, New York, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Scherrer, J.R., Concepts, knowledge and language in healthcare information systems: Follow-up 30 months later. Methods Inf. Med. 37(4/5):312–314, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Meadow, C. T., Text Information Retrieval Systems. 1st edn. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cleverdon, C. W., and Thorne, R. G., a brief experiment with the Uniterm system of coordinate indexing for the cataloging of structural data. RAE Library Memorndum#7, AD35004. Farnborough, UK: Royal aircraft Establishment, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Harter, S. P., and Hert, C. A., Evaluation of information retrieval systems: Approaches, issues, and methods. Williams, M. E., (ed.), ARIST. Information Today, Medford, NJ, pp. 3–94, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Croft, W. B., Knowledge-based and statistical approaches to text retrieval. IEEE Expert 8:8–12, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tague-Sutciffe, J. M., Some perspectives on the evaluation of information retrieval systems. JASIS 47(1):1–3, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Minker, J., Information storage and retrieval—A survey and functional description. SIGIR Forum, Assoc. Comp. Mach. 12(2): 1–108, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mannoni, B., Bringing museums online. Commun. ACM 39(6):100–105, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Schatz, B., and Chen, H., Digital libraries: Technological advances and social impacts. Computer 32(2):45–50, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tague, J., Salminen, A., and McClellan, C., Complete formal model for information retrieval systems. In ACM SIGIR International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval; 1991 October, Chicago, IL: ACM Press, New York, pp. 14–20, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Borgman, C. L., Hirsh, S. G., and Hiller, J., Rethinking online monitoring methods for information retrieval systems: From search product to search process. JASIS 47(7):568–583, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Buckland, M., and Plaunt, C., On the construction of selection systems. Library Hi Tech. 4(12):15–28, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Shneiderman, B., Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human–Computer Interaction. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 3050, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, V8W 3P5

    Yuri Kagolovsky & Jochen R. Moehr

Authors
  1. Yuri Kagolovsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jochen R. Moehr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuri Kagolovsky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kagolovsky, Y., Moehr, J.R. Terminological Problems in Information Retrieval. Journal of Medical Systems 27, 399–408 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025687220609

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025687220609

Search

Navigation