Skip to main content
Log in

Policy Instruments for Groundwater Management in the Netherlands

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the Netherlands agriculture andnature have conflicting interests with respectto groundwater management. Insight into thesuitability of policy instruments to achieveoptimal groundwater level and extractionmanagement in the Netherlands is, however,missing. In this paper the suitability ofpolicy instruments for groundwater managementis studied. Changes in the institutionalenvironment and voluntary agreements seem to bemore suitable for groundwater level managementthan economic instruments. The currenthistorical groundwater extraction rightssystems together with the low groundwaterprices encourage low-value agriculturalgroundwater usage, whereas sprinkling bans andirrigation scheduling currently aim to reducelow-value use of groundwater. These extractioninstruments are less efficient than a systemthat considers externalities in the price ofwater or diverts water away from agriculturewhile encouraging trading.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boland, D., H. Bleumink and J. C. Buys (1996), Naar een beregeningsplanner voor agrariërs II, Toesting in the praktijk (Towards an sprinkling planner for farmers II, Testing it in practise). CLM 235, Utrecht.

  • Colby, B. G., K. Crandall and D. B. Bush (1993)‘Water Rights Transactions: Market Values and Price Dispersions’ Water Resources Research 29(6), 1565-1572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinar, A. and A. Wolf (1994), International Markets for Water and the Potential for Regional Cooperation. Economic and Political Perspectives in the Western Middle East.

  • Kruitwagen, S., H. Folmer, E. Hendrix, L. Hordijk and E. van Ierland (2000)‘Trading Sulphur Emissions in Europe: “Guided Bilateral Trade”’ Environmental and Resource Economics 16, 423-441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelson, A. M. and R. A. Young (1993)‘Optioning Agricultural Water Rights for Urban Water Supplies During Drought’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75, 1010-1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. and R. Turner (1990), Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perdok, P. J. and J. Wessel (1998)‘Netherlands’ in F. N. Correia, ed., Institutions for water resources management in Europe.

  • Shah, F. and D. Zilberman (1992), Queuing vs. Markets. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California.

  • Strosser, P. (1997), Analysing Alternative Policy Instruments for the Irrigation Sector. An Assessment of the Potential for Water Market Development in the Chishtian Sub-division. Ph.D Thesis, Wageningen University.

  • Van Staalduinen L. C., M. W. Hoogeveen, C. Ploeger and J. Dijk (1996), Heffing van grondwaterbelasting via een forfait; Een onderzoek naar de mogelijkheden voor de land-en tuinbouw (Levying a groundwater tax). Publication 3.163, Agricultural Economics Research Institute, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hellegers, P., van Ierland, E. Policy Instruments for Groundwater Management in the Netherlands. Environ Resource Econ 26, 163–172 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025685621417

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025685621417

Navigation