Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring Disparities in Information Capture Timeliness Across Healthcare Settings: Effects on Data Quality

  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The emergence of evidence-based medicine in the United States has created an industry-wide environment where the quality of data maintained by healthcare organizations is becoming a critical factor in the delivery of medical care. Such a transition necessitates a corresponding need for consistent data collection and maintenance methods. In this study results of a national survey of health information managers were used to assess prevalence of a standard data quality practice, the adoption of policies related to timeliness of data capture. Findings from this survey show that, on a national level, only a slight majority of respondents indicated adoption of timeliness policies. About 61% of respondents indicate they have policies and procedures addressing data timeliness, although persistent patterns of nonadoption were found. We examine how the timeliness of data collection might serve as part of an overall data collection strategy that managers can employ to improve the quality of their information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Lorence, D., Benchmarking quality under USA health care reform: The next generation. Qual. Prog. 27(4):103–107, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mendelson, H., and Kraemer, K. L., Clockspeed and information response: Evidence from the information technology industry. Inf. Syst. Res. Dec.:415–433, 1998.

  3. Ballou, D., and Pazer, H., Designing information systems to optimize the accuracy-timeliness tradeoff. Inf. Syst. Res. 6:51–72, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fox, C., Levitin, A., and Redman, T. C., The notion of data and its quality dimensions. Inf. Process. Manage. 30:9–19, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frates, J., Ginty, M. J., and Baker, L., Optimizing claims payment for successful risk management. Health Finance Manage. 56(5):56–60, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ballou, D., Wang, R., Pazer, H., and Tayi, G., Modeling information manufacturing systems to determine information product quality. Manage. Sci. 44:462–484, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Coats, B., 1–2–3 Guide to Medical Billing, National Association of Claims Processing Professionals, Des Plaines, IL, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. DeJesus, E., Claims processing speeds up. Healthc. Inform., June 2000.

  9. Sakamoto, N., Object-oriented development of a concept learning system for time-centered clinical data. J. Med. Syst. 20(4):183–196, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sicotte, C., Denis, J. L., Lehoux, P., and Champagne, F., The computer-based patient record challenges towards timeless and spaceless medical practice. J. Med. Syst. 22(4):237–256, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vassilacopoulos, G., and Paraskevopoulou, E. A process model basis for evolving hospital information systems, J. Med. Syst. 21(3):141–153, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lorence, D. P., and Spink, A., Regional variation in medical systems data: Influences on upcoding. J. Med. Syst. 26(5):369–381, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lorence, D., and Spink, A., Regional Variation in Medical Data Quality Management. Proc. 2002 Inf. Res. Manage. Assoc. Int. Conf. Seattle, WA, 2002.

  14. Lorence, D., National implementation patterns of computer-based patient records, Proc. Natl. Conf. on Health Stat. NCHVS, Washington, DC, Aug 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sparrow, M., Assessment of existing fraud control systems. In License to Steal, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lorence, D. Measuring Disparities in Information Capture Timeliness Across Healthcare Settings: Effects on Data Quality. Journal of Medical Systems 27, 425–433 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025655721518

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025655721518

Navigation