Skip to main content
Log in

Office Romances: The New Battleground Over Employees' Rights to Privacy and the Employers' Right to Intervene

  • Published:
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Office romances have increased dramatically as more men and women work together for prolonged periods. The article reviews reasons why office romances are flourishing, examines the corporate response to office romances, discusses the rights and responsibilities of employees, co-workers, and employers, and recommends courses of action for each.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adams, M. (1992). Sex harassment claims up sharply. Boston Globe, (July 1992), 3.

  • Anderson, C. I., & Hunsaker, P. L. (1985). Why there's romancing at the office and why it's everybody's problem. Personnel, (February), 57–63.

  • Anderson, C. J., & Fisher, C. (1991). Male-female relationships in the workplace: Perceived motivations in office romances. Sex Roles, (August 1) 25 (3&4), 163–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braiker, H. B. (1988). The etiquette of love at the office. Working Woman. (November), 13(11), 148–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesanow, N. (1992). Do office romances ruin careers? Working Woman, (July) 22(7), 84–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, M. (1994). Sex in America today. Parade Magazine Rocky Mountain News, (August 7), 4–7.

  • Colby, L. (1991). Regulating love. Personnel, (June) 68(6), 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Droke, M.W. (1992). Private, legislative and judicial options for clarification of employee rights to the contents of their electronic mail systems. Santa Clara Law Review, 32(1), 167–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkouri, F., & Elkouri, E.A. (1985). How Arbitration Works. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, J. D. (1993). Sexual harassment in the workplace: A new frontier in the law of torts. Ohio Northern University Law Review, 19(3), 613–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galen, M., Schillen, Z. Hamilton, J., & Hammonds, K. H. (1991). Ending sexual harassment: Business is getting the message. Business Week, (March), 98–100.

  • Gutek, B.A. (1985). Sex and the Workplace: The Impact of Sexual Behavior and Harassment on Women, Men and Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hames, D. S., & Diersen, N. (1991). The common law right to privacy: Another incursion into employers' rights to manage their employees? Labor Law Journal, (November 1991) 42(11), 757–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, P. D., & Horn, J. C. (1982). Sex in the Office. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingrassia, M. (1993). Abused and confused. Newsweek, (October 25), 57–58.

  • Kennedy, M. M. (1992). Romance in the office. Across the Board, (March) 24(3), 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, F. (1991). Working Woman Case. Hearings on H.R. 1. The Civil Rights Act of 1991. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 102–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Losey, M. (1993). Manage the “personal” in interpersonal relations. Managing Office Technology, (Novmber) 38(11), 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainiero, L. A. (1989). Office Romance: Love, Power and Sex in The Workplace. New York: Rawson Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, J. M., & Harell, R. (1989). Managing today's hot workplace issues. Management World, (May–June) 18(3), 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • NREL (1991). Crossing the Line. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, P. M. (1993). Taming the office romance. Law Practice Management, (October 1993) 19(7), 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R. E., & Lees, P. L. (1984). Attraction and harassment: Dynamics of sexual politics in the workplace. Organizational Dynamics, (Autum 1984), 35–45.

  • Robinson, R. K., Fink, R. L., & Allen, B. M. (1994). Unresolved issues in hostile environment claims of sexual harassment. Labor Law Journal, (February 1994) 45(2), 111–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandroff, R. (1988). Sexual harassment in the Fortune 500. Working Woman, (December 1) 13(12), 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, R. J., & Myklebust, K. (1992). The influence of a history of romance on judgements and responses to a complaint of sexual harassment. Sex Roles, (October) 27 (7 & 8), 345–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornburg, L. (1993). Workplace couples face mixed reactions. HR Magazine (June) 38(6), 43–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (1981). Sexual Harassment in the Federal Workplace. Is It A Problem? Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (1988). Sexual Harassment in the Federal Government: An Update. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warfield, A. (1987). Co-worker romances: Impact on the work group and on career-oriented women. Personnel, (May) 64(5), 22–35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoffman, L., Clinebell, S. & Kilpatrick, J. Office Romances: The New Battleground Over Employees' Rights to Privacy and the Employers' Right to Intervene. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 10, 263–275 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025607232517

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025607232517

Navigation