Skip to main content
Log in

The prevalence and pattern of congenital anomalies of the urinary tract detected by intravenous urography in Kuwait

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We conducted a prospective population-basedstudy in Kuwait to determine the prevalence andpattern of previously undiagnosed congenitalanomalies of urinary tract in patientsundergoing intravenous urography (IVU) and toexamine the demographic factors associated withthese anomalies. The study included 2398consecutive patients undergoing IVU, forvarious indications, in all the six publichospitals in Kuwait, during the period 1 June1999–30 September 2000. Patients were alsointerviewed to obtain selected demographicinformation. Multiple logistic regression wasused to identify factors associated with theanomalies. The average age (± SD) of thepatients (1623 males, 775 females) was 39.2± 15.1 years. A total of 335 anomalies(12.1% in males, 17.9% in females;p < 0.001) were detected in 300 (12.5%)patients (10.9% males, 15.9% females; p < 0.01). About half (47.2%) of the anomaliesinvolved the kidney, 28.4% renal pelvis,22.4% ureters, and 2.1% bladder. Multipleregression analysis showed that age < 20 years(odds ratio (OR) = 12.5; 95% confidenceinterval (95% CI): 7.0–22.3) female gender (OR= 1.5; 95% CI: 1.2–2.0) Kuwaiti nationality(OR = 1.7; 95% CI: 1.2–2.3) and family historyof congenital malformation (OR = 3.8; 95% CI:2.2–6.6) were independently associated with theanomalies of the urinary tract. Overall, 42%of the patients reported a consanguineousmarriage between their parents. The frequencyof anomalies was higher in individuals who hadconsanguineous parents (13.8 vs. 11.6%; OR =1.2) but this positive association did notreach statistical significance. Considering therelatively high prevalence of previouslyundiagnosed congenital anomalies of the urinarytract, it is important to establish clinicalguidelines for early detection and managementof these conditions to decrease the associatedmorbidity and mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Annual Statistical Abstract. Kuwait: Ministry of Planning, Statistics and Information Sector, 2000.

  2. Al-Awadi SA, Moussa MA, Naguib KK et al. Consanguinity among the Kuwaiti population. Clin Genet 1985; 27: 483–486.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Gazali LI, Dawodu AH, Sabarinathan K, Varghese M. The profile of major congenital abnormalities in the United Arab Emirates population. J Med Genet 1995; 32: 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barakat AJ, Drougas JG. Occurrence of congenital abnormalities of kidney and urinary tract in 13,775 autopsies. Urology 1991; 38: 347–350.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berry CA, Channtler C. Urogenital malformations and disease. Br Med Bull 1986; 42: 181–186.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bittar Z. Major congenital malformations presenting in the first 24 hours of life in 3865 consecutive births south of Beirut. Incidence and pattern. Lebanese Med. J 1998; 46: 256–260.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bois E, Feingold J, Benmaiz H, Briard ML. Congenital urinary tract malformations: Epidemiologic and genetic aspects. Clin Genet 1975; 8: 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Calzolari E, Cavazutti GB, Cocci G et al. Congenital malformations in 100,000 consecutive births in Emilia Romagna region of northern Italy: Comparison with the Eurocat data. Eur J Epidemiol 1987; 3: 423–430.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hashmi MA. Frequency of consanguinity and its effect on congenital malformation - A hospital based study. J Pak Med Assoc 1997; 47: 75–78.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Helin I, Winberg J. Chronic renal failure in Swedish children. Acta Paediat Scand 1980; 69: 607–611.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jain VK, Nalini P, Chandra R, Srinivasan S. Congenital malformations, reproductive wastage and consanguineous mating. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 33: 33–36.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mihara M, Ito Y, Fukushima K et al. Ultrasonographic screening for renal abnormalities in three-year-old children. Acta Paediatr 1992; 81: 326–328.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Radovanovic Z, Shah N, Behbehani J. Prevalence and social correlates of consanguinity in Kuwait. Annals of Saudi Med 1999; 19: 206–210.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rubentein M, Meyer R, Bernstein J. Congenital abnormalities of the urinary system. I. A postmortem survey of devel-opmental anomalies and acquired congenital lesions in a children's hospital. J Pediatr 1961; 58: 356–366.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sheih CP, Liu MS, Hung CS et al. Renal abnormalities in schoolchildren. Pediatrics 1989; 84: 1086–1090.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Simpson JL, German J. Familial urinary tract anomalies. JAMA 1970; 212: 2264–2268.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stoll C, Alembik Y, Roth MP et al. Risk factors in internal urinary system malformations. Pediat. Nephrol 1990; 4: 319–323.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stoll C, Alembik Y, Dott B, Feingold J. Parental consanguinity as a cause of increased incidence of birth defects in a study of 131,760 consecutive births. Am J Med Genet 1994; 49: 114–117.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wals de P, Dolk E, Gillerot Y. Base-line prevalence of congenital anomalies in 17 EUROCAT Registers, 1980-1983. In: De Wals P, Lechat MF, eds. Surveillance of Congenital Anoma-lies, 1980-1983. Bruxelles: Department of Epidemiology, University of Louvain, 1986: 8–101.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gupta, R., Memon, A., Al-Khawari, H. et al. The prevalence and pattern of congenital anomalies of the urinary tract detected by intravenous urography in Kuwait. Int Urol Nephrol 34, 477–483 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025600219402

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025600219402

Navigation