Abstract
We investigated if Type A Structured Interview (SI)-assessed hostility (PoHo) is subject to voluntary underreporting, or faking-good, by hostile subjects. Sixteen men who previously scored above the clinical cutoff of 3 on SI hostility were randomly assigned to an experimental (N = 8) or control (N = 8) group. Both groups underwent a second videotaped SI, prior to which experimental subjects were asked to present themselves in a favorable light. Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed that experimental subjects were able successfully to decrease their global PoHo scores when instructed to do so (38% scored below the clinical cutoff score). The SI-derived hostility score is vulnerable to faking-good, and attention should be paid to both the motivational set of subjects and the instructions given prior to the SI.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Barefoot, J. C. (1992). Developments in the measurement of hostility. In Friedman, H. S. (ed.), Hostility Coping and Health, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 13–31.
Barefoot, J. C., and Lipkus, I. M. (1994). The assessment of anger and hostility. In Siegman, A. W., and Smith, T. W. (eds.), Anger, Hostility, end the Heart, Lawrence Eribaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 43–66.
Barefoot, J. C., Peterson, B. L., Dahlstrom, W. G., Siegler, I. C., Anderson, N. B., and Williams, R. B. (1991). Hostility patterns and health implications: Correlates of Cook-Medley Hostility Scale scores in a national survey. Health Psychol. 10: 18–24.
Berry, D. T. R., Wetter, M. W., and Baer, R. A. (1995). Assessment of malingering. In Butcher, J. N. (ed.), Clinical Personality Assessment: Practical Approaches, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 236–248.
Cook, W. W., and Medley, D. M. (1954). Proposed hostility and pharisaic-virtue scales for the MMPI. J. Appl. Psychol. 38: 414–418.
Dembroski, T. M., and Costa, P. T. (1987). Coronary-prone behavior: Components of the Type A pattern and hostility. J. Personal. 55: 211–235.
Dembroski, T. M., and MacDougall, J. M. (1983). Behavioral and psychophysiological perspectives on coronary-prone behavior. In Dembroski, T. M., and Schmidt, T. H., (eds.), Biobehavioral Bases of Coronary Heart Disease, Karger, New York, pp. 109–123.
Dembroski, T. M., MacDougall, J. M., Costa, P. T., Jr., and Grandits, G. A. (1989). Components of hostility as predictors of sudden death and myocardial infarction in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Psychosom. Med. 51: 514–522.
Engebretson, T. O., and Matthews, K. A. (1992). Dimensions of hostility in men, women, and boys: Relationships to personality and cardiovascular responses to stress. Psychosom. Med. 54: 311–323.
Gidron, Y., and Davidson, K. (1994). An effective intervention for reducing mortality-prone hostility components. Ann. Behav. Med. 16 (Suppl. 2): S1 (Summary).
Gidron, Y., and Davidson, K. (1996). Development and preliminary testing of a brief intervention for modifying CHD-predictive hostility components. J. Behav. Med. 19: 203–220.
Gidron, Y., Davidson, K., and Bate, I. (1996). The effects of a hostility intervention on hostility and health measures of CHD patients. Ann. Behav. Med. 4th Int. Congr. Proc. Suppl. S088 (abstract).
Hearn, M. D., Murray, D. M., and Luepker, R. V. (1989). Hostility, coronary heart disease, and total mortality: A 33–year, follow-up study of university students. J. Behav. Med. 12: 105–121.
Hecker, M., Chesney, M., Black, G., and Frautschi, N. (1988). Coronary-prone behaviors in the Western Collaborative Group Study. Psychosom. Med. 50: 153–164.
Helmers, K. F., Posluszny, D. M., and Krantz, D. S. (1994). Associations of hostility and coronary artery disease: A review of studies. In Siegman, A. W., and Smith, T. W. (eds.), Anger, Hostility, and the Heart, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 67–96
Leon, G. R., Finn, S. E., Murray, D., and Bailey, J. M. (1988). The inability to predict cardiovascular disease from hostility scores of MMPI items related to Type A behavior. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 56: 597–600.
Matthews, K. A., Glass, D. C., Rosenman, R. H., and Bortner, R. W. (1977). Competitive drive, pattern A, and coronary heart disease: A further analysis of some data from the Western Collaborative Group Study. J. Chron. Dis. 30: 489–498.
McCranie, E. W., Watkins, L. O., Brandsma, J. M., and Sisson, B. D. (1986). Hostility, coronary heart disease (CHD) incidence and total mortality: Lack of association in a 25–year follow-up study of 478 physicians. J. Behav. Med. 9: 119–125.
Musante, L., MacDougall, J. M., Dembroski, T. M., and Costa, P. T. (1989). Potential for hostility and dimensions of anger. Health Psychol. 8: 343–354.
Rosenman, R. H. (1978). The interview method of assessment of the coronary-prone behavior pattern. In Dembroski, T. M., Weiss, S., Shields, J., Haynes, S. G., and Feinleib, M. (eds.), Coronary-Prone Behavior, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 55–70.
Rosenman, R. H., Friedman, M., Straus, R., et al. (1964). A predictive study of coronary heart disease: The Western Collaborative Group Study. JAMA 189: 15–22.
Williams, R. B., Barefoot, J. C., Haney, T. L., Harrell, F. E., Blumenthal, J. A., and Whalen, R. (1988). Type A behavior, hostility, and coronary atherosclerosis. Psychosom. Med. 50: 139–152
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davidson, K., Hall, P. Potential for Hostility and Faking-Good in High-Hostile Men. J Behav Med 20, 47–54 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025587113192
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025587113192