Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative Genetic Structure of the Threatened Tenebrionid Beetle Oplocephala haemorrhoidalis and its Common Relative Bolitophagus reticulatus

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We used RAPD and allozyme genetic markers to compare the genetic structures of a threatened saproxylic tenebrionid beetle, Oplocephala haemorrhoidalis, and its common relative (different subfamilies), Bolitophagus reticulatus, to evaluate the relative importance of habitat fragmentation on the occurrence of the two species. O. haemorrhoidalis showed significantly higher levels of genetic differentiation between sites than B. reticulatus for both types of genetic marker. Patterns of isolation by distance were consistent with (B. reticulatus) or close to (O. haemorrhoidalis) theoretical expectations for equilibrium between gene flow and genetic drift. For O. haemorrhoidalis, the RAPD-patterns also showed a steeper increase in isolation by distance where geographic distances were small than at larger distances. This suggests that gene flow between the populations of O. haemorrhoidalis has declined as an effect of recent habitat fragmentation and is probably relatively restricted at present. For B. reticulatus, levels of genetic differentiation were low, suggesting that B. reticulatus readily moves over large areas. Genetic variability was not low in either species. Genetic differentiation among and relatedness within fruiting bodies varied substantially within sites for both species. This variation was probably due to founder events: when levels of relatedness were close to zero, genetic differentiation was also low.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Binot M., Bless R., Boye P., Gruttke H. and Pretscher P.1998. Rote Liste-gerfährdete Tiere Deutschlands. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn-Bad Godesberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkey T.V.1995. Extinction rates in archipelagoes: implications for populations in fragmented habitats. Conservation Biology9: 527–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esseen P.-A., Ehnström B., Ericsson L. and Sjöberg K.1997. Boreal forests. Ecological Bulletins46: 16–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R. and Ralls K.1998. Inbreeding leads to extinction. Nature392: 441–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fridman J. and Walheim M.2000. Amount, structure and dynamics of dead wood on managed forest land in Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management131: 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors U. (Ed.)2000. The 2000 Red-List of Swedish Species. Artdatabanken, SLU, Uppsala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris H. and Hopkinson D.A.1978. Handbook of Enzyme Electrophoresis in Human Genetics. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebert P.D.N. and Beaton M.J.1993. Methodologies for Allozyme Analysis Using Cellulose Acetate Electrophoresis. Helena Laboratories, Beaumont, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison D.W. and Templeton A.R.1999. Correlation of pairwise genetic and geographic distance measures: inferring the relative influences of gene flow and drift on the distribution of genetic variability. Evolution53: 1898–1914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannesen J., Samietz J., Wallaschek M., Seitz A. and Veith M.1999. Patch connectivity and genetic variation in two congeneric grasshopper species with different habitat preferences. Journal of Insect Conservation3: 201–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsell M. and Nordlander G.2002. Insects in polypore fungi as indicator species: a comparison between forest sites differing in amounts and continuity of dead wood. Forest Ecology and Management157: 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsell M., Nordlander G. and Ehnström B.2001. Substrate associations of insects breeding i fruiting bodies of wood-decaying fungi. Ecological Bulletins49: 173–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsell M., Schroeder M. and Larsson T., 2003. The saproxylic beetle Bolitophagus reticulates: its frequency in managed forest, attraction to volatiles and flight period. Ecography26: 421–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson M.2003. Colonisation ability of the threatened tenebrionid beetle Oplocephala haemorrhoidalis and its common relative Bolitophagus reticulatus. Ecological Entomology28: 159–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson M., Jonsell M. and Nordlander G.2001. Priorities in conservation biology: a comparison between two polypore-inhabiting beetles. Ecological Bulletins49: 195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyghobadi N., Roland J. and Strobeck C.1999. Influence of landscape on the population genetic structure of the alpine butterfly Parnassius smintheus (Papilionidae). Molecular Ecology8: 1481–1495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M. and Weiss G.H.1964. The stepping stone model of population structure and the decrease of genetic correlation with distance. Genetics49: 561–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby K.J. and Atkins C. (Eds.) 1998. The Ecological History of European Forests. CAB International, Oxon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutsen H., Rukke B.A., Jorde P.-E. and Ims R.A.2000. Genetic differentiation among populations of the beetle Bolito­phagus reticulatus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) in a fragmented and a continuous landscape. Heredity84: 667–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig W.D., Van Vuren D. and Hooge P.N.1996. Detectability, philopatry, and the distribution of dispersal distances in vertebrates. TREE11: 514–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg S. and Gustavsson B.1995. Catalogus coleopterorum sueciae. Natural History Museum, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M. and Milligan B.G.1994. Analysis of population genetic structure with RAPD markers. Molecular Ecology3: 91–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manly B.F.S.1985. The Statistics of Natural Selection on Animal Populations. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller M.P.1997. Tools for Population Genetics (TFPGA) 1.3: A Windows Program for the Analysis of Allozyme and Molecular Population Genetic Data. Computer software distributed by author.

  • Nilsson S.G.1997a. Forests in the temperate-boreal transition: natural and man-made features. Ecological Bulletins46: 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson T.1997b. Spatial population dynamics of the black tinder fungus beetle, Bolitophagus reticulatus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 311, Acta Univ. Ups., Uppsala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queller C.Q. and Goodnight K.F.1989. Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution43: 258–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack R.B.1993. Essentials of Conservation Biology. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rassi P., Mannerkoski I., Peltonen S.-L. and Alanen A.2000. 2nd Red Data Book of Finland. Ministry of Environment, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond M. and Rousset F.1995. GENEPOP (V.1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity86: 248–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roland J., Keyghobadi N. and Fownes S.2000. Alpine Parnassius butterfly dispersal: effects of landscape and population size. Ecology81: 1642–1653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousset F.1997. Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics145: 1219–1228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rukke B.A. and Midtgaard F.1998. The importance of scale and spatial variables for the fungivorous beetle Bolitophagus reticulatus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) in a fragmented forest landscape. Ecography21: 561–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saccheri I., Kuussaari M., Kankare M., Vikman P., Fortelius W. and Hanski I.1998. Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature392: 491–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siitonen J.2001. Forest management of coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecological Bulletins49: 11–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin M.1985. Gene flow in natural populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics16: 393–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey P.B., Johnson V.A. and Taper M.L.1997. Migration within metapopulations: the impact upon local population dynamics. In: Hanski I.A. and Gilpin M.E. (eds), Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 267–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sverdrup-Thygeson A. and Midtgaard F.1998. Fungus-infected trees as islands in boreal forest: Spatial distribution of the fungivorous beetle Bolitophagus reticulatus (Coleoptera: tenebrionidae). Ecoscience5: 486–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas C.D. and Hanski I.A.1997. Butterfly metapopulations. In: Hanski I.A. and Gilpin M.E. (eds), Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 359–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir B.S. and Cockerham C.C.1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution38: 1358–1370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitlock M.C.1992. Nonequilibrium population structure in forked fungus beetles: extinction, colonization, and the genetic variance among populations. American Naturalist139: 952–970.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Entomology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7044, SE-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden

    Mattias Jonsson

  2. Department of Ecology, Zoological Institute, Johannes Gutenberg-University, DE-55099, Mainz, Germany

    Jes Johannesen & Alfred Seitz

Authors
  1. Mattias Jonsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jes Johannesen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alfred Seitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mattias Jonsson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jonsson, M., Johannesen, J. & Seitz, A. Comparative Genetic Structure of the Threatened Tenebrionid Beetle Oplocephala haemorrhoidalis and its Common Relative Bolitophagus reticulatus . Journal of Insect Conservation 7, 111–124 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025552623766

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025552623766

Search

Navigation