Abstract
In this paper one uses an infinite time horizon optimal control paradigm to deal with three important issues in global climate change integrated assessment, namely the equitable treatment of all the generations involved, the representation of technical progress, and the uncertainty concerning technological progress and climate change processes. The notion of economic sustainability is associated with the concept of turnpike in infinite horizon optimization models. The issue of deciding on the proper discount rate is addressed in this context and a method is proposed to reconcile long term sustainability and short term time preference for current generations. One also formulates a model where environmental damage and/or technical progress are represented as stochastic jump processes. One calls this random evolution a mode switching process. In this context, sustainability is represented by a family of turnpikes, and the economy will be driven from one steady state to the other as the modes switch. These concepts are illustrated on the DICE model and their possible implementation in other types of integrated assessment models is discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Altman, E. Feinberg and A. Schwartz, Weighted discounted stochastic games with perfect information, in: Advances in Dynamic Games and Applications, eds. J.A. Filar, V. Gaitsgory and K. Mizukami, Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games (2000).
H.W. Arndt, The Rise Land Fall of Economic Growth: A Study in Contemporary Thought (Longman Cheshire, Sydney, 1978).
G. Ainslie and N. Haslam, Hyperbolic discounting, in: Choice Over Time, eds. Loewenstein and Elster (Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1992).
K. Arrow and M. Kurz, Public Investment, the Rate of Return, and Optimal Investment Policies (John Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1970).
O. Bahn and C. Frei, GEM-E3 Switzerland: A Computable General Equilibrium Model applied for Switzerland, PSI Report 00-01, Villigen, CH (2000).
K. Arrow, B. Bolin, R. Costanza, P. Dasgupta, C. Folke, C. Holling, B.-O. Jansson, S. Levin, K.-G. Maler, C. Perrings and D. Pimental, Economic growth carrying capacity and the environment, Science 268 (1995) 520–521.
K.J. Arrow, W.R. Cline, K.G. Maeler, M. Munasinghe, R. Squitieri and J.E. Stiglitz, Intertemporal equity, discounting, and economic efficiency, in: Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions, Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, eds. J.P. Bruce, H. Lee and E.F. Haites, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996) pp. 125–144.
G.B. Asheim, W. Buchholz and B. Tungodden, Justifying sustainability, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41 (2001) 252–268.
A. Ayong Le Kama, Sustainable growth, renewable resources and pollution, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 25 (2001) 1911–1918.
M.H. Babiker, J.M. Reilly, M. Mayer, R.S. Eckaus, I.S. Wing and R.C. Hyman, The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) model: Revisions, sensitivities and comparison results, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No 71 (October 2001).
A. Baranzini and F. Bourguignon, Is sustainable growth optimal?, in: International Tax and Public Finance, Vol. 2 (1995) pp. 341–356.
W. Baumol and W. Oates, Economics, Environmental Policy and the Quality of Life (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1979).
W. Baumol and W. Oates, The Theory of Environmental Policy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988).
W. Beckerman, Economic growth and the environment: whose growth? Whose environment? World Development 20 (1992) 481–496.
A. Beltratti, G. Chichilnisky and G. Heal, The green golden rule, Economic Letters 49 (1995) 175–179.
A. Bernard and M. Vielle, Toward a future for the Kyoto Protocol: some simulations with GEMINI-E3, mimeo (2001).
E.K. Boukas, A. Haurie and P. Michel, An optimal control problem with a random stopping time, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 64(3) (1990) 471–480.
E.A. Boukas, A. Haurie and Ch. van Delft, A turnpike improvement algorithm for piecewise deterministic control, Optimal Control Applications and Methods 12 (1991) 1–18.
R.B. Braddock, J.A. Filar and R. Zappert, Mathematical formulation of the IMAGE greenhouse effect model, Applied Mathematical Modelling 18 (1994) 234–254.
P. Capros et al., GEM-E3: Computable general equilibrium model for studying economy-energy-environment interactions, EUR 16714 EN, European Commission DG XII, Brussels (1995).
P. Capros et al., The GEM-E3 Model: Reference Manual (National Technical University of Athens, Greece, 1997).
D. Carlson, A. Haurie and A. Leizarowitz, Infinite Horizon Optimal Control: Deterministic and Stochastic Systems (Springer Verlag, 1994).
G. Chichilnisky, An axiomatic approach to sustainable development, Soc. Choice Welf. 13 (1996) 231–257.
G. Chichilnisky, What is sustainable development, Land Economy 73 (1997) 467–491.
W.R. Cline, Discounting for the very long term, in: Discounting and Intergenerational Equity, eds. Portney and Weyant (Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, 1999).
M.L. Cropper, S.K. Aydede and P.R. Portney, Rates of time preference for saving lives, The American Economic Review 82(2) (1992) 469–472.
J.A. Filar and A. Haurie, Uncertainty in environmental models: dynamic systems perspective, in: The Co-action between Living Systems and the Planet, eds. H. Greppin, R. Degli-Agosti and C. Penel (University of Geneva, laboratoire de biochimie et physiologie végétale, 1998) pp. 283–382.
J.A. Filar, V. Gaitsgory and A. Haurie, Control of singularly perturbed hybrid systems, IEEE Trans. Aut. Control (2001).
J.A. Filar and A. Haurie, A two-factor stochastic production model with two time scales, Automatica 37 (2001) 1505–1513.
C.E. Forest, P.H. Stone and H.D. Jacoby, How to think about human influence on climate, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No 68 (October 2000).
P.S. Gaertner, Optimisation analysis and integrated models of enhanced greenhouse effect, Environmental Modeling and Assessment 6 (2001) 7–34.
M. Ha-Duong, M.J. Grubb and J.-C.M. Hourcade, Influence of socioeconomic inertia and uncertainty on optimal CO2-emission abatement, Nature 390 (1997) 270–273.
L. Hamilton, G. Goldstein, J. Lee, A. Manne, W. Marcuse, S. Morris and C.-O. Wene, MARKAL-MACRO: An overview, Brookhaven National Laboratory, BNL-48377 (1992).
J.M. Hartwick, Intergenerational equity and the investing of rents from exhaustible resources, American Economic Review 66 (1977) 972–974.
C.M. Harvey, The reasonableness of non-constant discounting, Journal of Public Economics 53 (1994) 31–51.
A. Haurie, Environmental coordination in dynamic oligopolistic markets, Group Decision and Negotiation 4 (1995) 39–57.
A. Haurie, in: Time, Risk and Conflicts in Economics and Management Science: A Story about Turnpikes, ed. G. Zaccour (Kluwer, 2001).
A. Haurie, A. Leizarowitz and Ch. van Delft, Boundedly optimal control of piecewise deterministic systems, European Journal of Operational Research 73(2) (1994) 237–251.
A. Haurie and Ch. van Delft, Turnpike properties for a class of piecewise deterministic systems arising in manufacturing flow control, Annals of Operations Research 29 (1991) 351–374.
G.M. Heal, Interpreting sustainability, mimeo Columbia Business School, New York (May 1996).
G.M. Heal, Optimality or sustainability?, mimeo Columbia Business School, New York (June 2001).
G.M. Heal, Valuing the Future: Economic Theory and Sustainability (Columbia University Press, New York, 1998).
G. Loewenstein and D. Prelec, Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation, in: Choice Over Time, eds. Loewenstein and Elster (Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1992).
C.-Z. Li and K.-G. Löfgren, Justifying sustainability, Journal of Environmental Economics and Man7agement 41 (2001) 135–165.
C.-Z. Li and K.-G. Löfgren, Economic growth, environmental quality and hyperbolic discounting, Technical report, Dept. of Economics, Umea University, Sweden (2001).
A. Manne, ETA-MACRO: A User's Guide, EA-1724 (Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, 1981).
A. Manne, Equity, efficiency and discounting, in: Discounting and Intergenerational Effects, eds. P.R. Portney and J.Weyant (Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, 1999) pp. 391–394.
A. Manne and R.G. Rishels, Buying Greenhouse Insurance: The Economic Costs of CO 2 Emission Limits, 2nd edn (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993).
A.S. Manne and R.G. Richels, AMERGE: A model for evaluatng regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies, Energy Policy 23 (1995) 17–34.
L.W. McKenzie, Turnpike theory, Econometrica 44 (1976) 469–472.
E.J. Mishan, Cost-Benefit Analysis: An Informal Introduction (Allen & Unwin, London, 1975).
W.D. Nordhaus, An optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases, Science 258 (Nov. 1992) 1315–1319.
W.D. Nordhaus, Managing the Global Commons: The Economics of Climate Change (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994).
W.D. Nordhaus, A market based discount rate, in: Discounting and Intergenerational Effects, eds. P.R. Portney and J.Weyant (Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, 1999) pp. 145–162.
W.D. Nordhaus and J. Boyer, Warming the World: Economic Models of Global Warming (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000).
R. Norgaard and R. Howarth, Sustainability and discounting the future, in: Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability, ed. R. Costanza (Columbia University Press, New York, 1991).
R. Pindyck, Optimal Timing Problems in Environmental Economics, ed. R.S. Pindyck, March, WP-2001-001, CEEPR (MIT, Cambridge, MA 2001).
B. Peleg and M.E. Yaari, On the existence of consistent course of action when tastes are changing, Review of Economic Studies 40 (1973) 391–401.
P.R. Portney and J. Weyant, eds., Discounting and Intergenerational Effects (Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, 1999).
F. Ramsey, A mathematic theory of saving, Economic Journal 38 (1928) 543–549.
R. Rishels, Controlled continuous time Markov processes, in: Stochastic Models, Handbook in Operations Research and Management Science, eds. D.P. Heyman and M.J. Sobel (North-Holland, 1990).
J. Rothmans, IMAGE: An Integrated Model to Assess the Greenhouse Effect (Kluwer, 1990).
F. Tóth, Intergenerational equity and discounting, Integrated Assessment 1 (2000) 127–136.
F.L. Tóth, T. Bruckner, H.-M. Fssel, M. Leimbach, G. Petschel-Held and H.-J. Schellnhuber, The tolerable windows approach to integrated assessments, in: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change and Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs)-Bridging the Gaps, Proc. of the IPCC Asia-Pacific Workshop on Integrated Assessment Models (United Nations University, Tokyo, Japan, 1997), CGER-Report, No. I029-'97 (1997) pp. 403–430.
M.L.Weitzman, Why the far-distant future should be discounted at its lowest possible rate, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36 (1998) 201–208.
M.L. Weitzman, Just keep discounting, but ..., in: Discounting and Intergenerational Effects, eds. P.R. Portney and J. Weyant (Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, 1999) pp. 23–29.
M.D. Webster, The curious role of learning in climate polics: should we wait for more data?, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No 67 (October 2000).
M.D. Webster and A.P. Sokolov, A methodology for quantifying uncertainty in climate projections, Climatic Change 46 (2000) 417–446.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haurie, A. Integrated Assessment Modeling for Global Climate Change: An Infinite Horizon Optimization Viewpoint. Environmental Modeling & Assessment 8, 117–132 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025534905304
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025534905304