Abstract
Artificial substrata have been used in diatom studies for almost 100 years. However, concern still exists over whether diatom communities developing on artificial substrata accurately represent communities developing on natural substrata. This study compares the diatom communities colonising glass slides and clay tiles in two coastal dune lakes, and compares these communities to the naturally occurring communities in the epipelon, epilithon, and epiphyton. Both glass microslides and clay tiles, incubated for three separate periods ranging from 29 to 68 days, resulted in replicate substratum samples supporting similar diatom community compositions at each site. The degree of variation between artificial substrata communities at different sites, and between the two artificial substrata types, was generally no more than the degree of variation between communities on different types of natural substrata. Additionally, the composition of the diatom communities on the artificial substrata was representative of the community composition on the natural substrata. The effects of incubation period and siting are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aloi, J. E., 1990. A critical review of recent freshwater periphyton field methods. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 47: 656–670.
Barbiero, R. P., 2000. A multi–lake comparison of epilithic diatom communities on natural and artificial substrates. Hydrobiologia 438: 157–170.
Blinn, D. W., A. Fredericksen & V. Korte, 1980. Colonisation rates and community structure of diatoms on three different rock substrata in a lotic system. Br. Phycol. J. 15: 303–310.
Bothwell, M. L., K. E. Suzuki, M. K. Bolin & F. J. Hardy, 1989. Evidence of dark avoidance by phototrophic periphytic diatoms in lotic systems. J. Phycol. 25: 85–94.
Brown, H. D., 1976. A comparison of the attached algal communities of a natural and an artificial substrate. J. Phycol. 12: 301–306.
Cattaneo, A. & M. C. Amireault, 1992. How artificial are artificial substrata for periphyton? J. n. am. Benthol. Soc. 11: 244–256.
Chessman, B. C., 1985. Artificial–substratum periphyton and water quality in the Lower La Trobe River, Victoria. Aust. J. mar. Freshwat. Res. 36: 855–871.
Fairchild, G. W. & R. L. Lowe, 1984. Artificial substrates which release nutrients: Effects on periphyton and invertebrate succession. Hydrobiologia 114: 29–37.
Fairchild, G. W. & J. W. Sherman, 1992. Linkage between epilithic algal growth and water column nutrients in softwater lakes. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 49: 1641–1649.
Foged, N., 1978. Diatoms in Eastern Australia. Bibl. Phycol. 41: 1–243.
Gell, P. A. & F. Gasse, 1994. Relationships between salinity and diatom flora from some Australian saline lakes. Mem. Cal. Acad Sci. 17: 631–647.
Hoagland, K. D., S. C. Roemer & J. R. Rosowski, 1982. Colonization and community structure of two periphyton assemblages, with emphasis on the diatoms (Bacillariophyceae). Am. J. Bot. 69: 188–213.
Holland, J. & R. L. Clark, 1989. Diatoms of Burrinjuck Reservoir, New South Wales, Australia. Divisional Report, CSIRO Institute of Natural Resources and Environment 89/1.
Hudon, C., H. C. Duthie & B. Paul, 1987. Physiological modifications related to density increase in periphytic assemblages. J. Phycol. 23: 393–399.
Jones, J. G., 1974. A method for observation and enumeration of epilithic algae directly on the surface of stones. Oecologia 16: 1–8.
Jones, J. G., 1978. Spatial variation in epilithic algae in a stony stream (Wilfin Beck) with particular reference to Cocconeis placentula. Freshwat. Biol. 8: 539–546.
Kelly, M. G., A. Cazaubon, E. Coring, A. Dell'Uomo, L. Ector, B. Goldsmith, H. Guasch, J. Hürlimann, A. Jarlman, B. Kawecka, J. Kwandrans, R. Laugaste, E.–A. Lindstrøm, M. Leitao, P. Marvan, J. Padisák, E. Pipp, J. Prygiel, E. Rott, S. Sabater, H. van Dam & J. Vizinet, 1998. Recommendations for the routine sampling of diatoms for water quality assessments in Europe. J. appl. Phycol. 10: 215–224.
Krammer, K. & H. Lange–Bertalot, 1991a. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. 3: Teil: Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. Gustav Fisher Verlag. Stuggart.
Krammer, K. & H. Lange–Beralot, 1991b. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. 4: Teil: Achnanthaceae, Kritische Ergänzungen zu Navicula (Lineolatae) und Gomphonema. Gustav Fisher Verlag. Stuggart.
Krammer, K. & H. Lange–Bertalot, 1997a. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. 1: Teil: Naviculaceae. Gustav Fisher. Stuggart.
Krammer, K. & H. Lange–Bertalot, 1997b. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. 2: Teil: Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae. Gustav Fisher. Stuggart.
Kutka, F. J. & C. Richards, 1996. Relating diatom assemblage structure to stream habitat quality. J. n. am. Benthol. Soc., 15: 469–480.
Lamberti, G. A. & V. H. Resh, 1985. Comparability of introduced tiles and natural substrates for sampling lotic bacteria, algae, and macroinvertebrates. Freshwat. Biol. 15: 21–30.
Lane, C. M., 2001. A comparison of diatom assemblages in two adjacent coastal dune lakes, northern New South Wales. Quat. Aust. 19(1): 34–42.
Munteanu, N. & E. J. Maly, 1981. The effect of current on the distribution of diatoms settling on submerged glass slides. Hydrobiologia 78: 273–282.
Naumann, E., 1915. Skrifter utg. Av. S. Sveriges Fisheriförening. 1915.
Racek, A. A., 1997. The Waters of Yuraygir. Yuraygir News, Wooli, NSW. 12 pp.
Reid, M. A., J. C. Tibby, D. Penny & P. A. Gell, 1995. The use of diatoms to assess past and present water quality. Aust. J. Ecol. 20: 57–64.
Reisen, W. K. & D. J. Spencer, 1970. Succession and current demand relationships of diatoms on artificial substrates in Prater's Creek, South Carolina. J. Phycol. 6: 117–121.
Robinson, C. T.& S. R. Rushforth, 1987. Effects of physical disturbance and canopy cover on attached diatom community structure in an Idaho stream. Hydrobiologia 154: 49–59.
Round, F. E., 1973. The Biology of the Algae, 2nd ed. Edward Arnold Limited, London: 278 pp.
Round, F. E., 1981. The Ecology of Algae. Cambridge University Press, Sydney: 653 pp.
Stevenson, R. J., 1984. Epilithic and epipelic diatoms in the Sandusky River, with emphasis on species diversity and water pollution. Hydrobiologia 114: 161–175.
Timms, B. V., 1969. A preliminary limnological survey of theWooli Lakes, New South Wales. Proc. linn. Soc. NSW. 94 105–112.
Timms, B. V., 1982. Coastal dune waterbodies of north–eastern New South Wales. Aust. J. mar. Freshwat. Res. 33: 203–222.
Tuchman, M. & D. W. Blinn, 1979. Comparison of attached algal communities on natural and artificial substrata along a thermal gradient. Br. phycol. J. 14: 243–254.
Tuchman, M. L. & R. J. Stevenson, 1980. Comparison of clay tile, sterilized rock, and natural substrate diatom communities in a small stream in Southeastern Michigan, U.S.A. Hydrobiologia 75: 73–79.
van Dam, H. & A. Mertens, 1993. Diatoms on herbarium macrophytes as indicators of water quality. Hydrobiologia 269/270: 437–445.
Werner, D., 1977. The Biology of Diatoms. University of California Press, Los Angeles: 498 pp.
Wu, J.–T., P.–P. Chuang, L.–Z. Wu & C.–T. A. Chen, 1997. Diatoms as indicators of environmental changes: a case study in Great Ghost Lake. Proc. Natl Sci. Counc. Repub. China [B] 21: 112–119.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lane, C.M., Taffs, K.H. & Corfield, J.L. A comparison of diatom community structure on natural and artificial substrata. Hydrobiologia 493, 65–79 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025498732371
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025498732371