Skip to main content

Will Teachers Receive Higher Student Evaluations by Giving Higher Grades and Less Course Work?

Abstract

This study investigated whether mean expected grades and the level of difficult/workload in courses, as reported by students, unduly influence student ratings instruction. Over 50,000 college courses whose teachers used the Student Instructional Report II were analyzed. In addition to the two primary independent variables, the regression analyses included 8 subject area groupings and controlled for such factors as class size, teaching method, and student perceived learning outcomes in the course. Learning outcomes had a large positive effect on student evaluations of instructions, as it should. After controlling for learning outcomes, expected grades generally did not affect student evaluations. In fact, contrary to what some faculty think, courses in natural sciences with expected grades of A were rated lower, not higher. Courses were rated lower when they were rated as either difficult or too elementary. Courses rated at the “just right” level received the highest evaluations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

REFERENCES

  1. Abrami, P. C., Dickens, W. J., Perry, R. P., and Leventhal, L. (1980). Do teacher standards for assigning grades affect student evaluations of instruction? J. Educ. Psychol. 72: 107–118.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baird, L. L. (1976). Using Self-Reports to Predict Student Performance, The College Board, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cashin, W. E. (1988). Student ratings of teaching: A summary of research. IDEA Report No. 20, Kansas State University, Division of Continuing Education.

  4. Cashin, W. E. (1990). Students do rate different academic fields differently. In: Theall, M., and Franklin, J. (eds.), Student Ratings of Instruction: Issues for Improving Instruction, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 43, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Centra, J. A. (1972). The Student Instructional Report: Its Development and Uses, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Centra, J. A. (1998). Development of the Student Instructional Report II, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Centra, J. A. (1993). Reflective Faculty Evaluation, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Centra, J. A. (2002). Will teachers receive higher student evaluations by giving higher grades and less coursework. Research Report No. 10, The Student Instructional Report II, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Centra, J. A., and Creech, F. R. (1976). The relationship between student, teachers, and course characteristics and student ratings of teacher effectiveness. Project Report 76-1, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Centra, J. A., and Gaubatz, N. B. (2000a). Is there gender bias in student evaluations of teaching? J. Higher Educ. 71: 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Centra, J. A., and Gaubatz, N. B. (2000b). Student perceptions of learning and instructional effectiveness in college courses. Research Report No. 9, The Student Instructional Report II, The Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  12. d'Apollonia, S., and Abrami, P. C. (1997). Navigating student ratings of instruction. Am.Psychol. 52: 1198–1208.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dowell, D. A., and Neal, J. A. (1982). A selective view of the validity of student ratings of teaching. J. Higher Educ. 53: 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Feldman, K. A. (1978). Course characteristics and college students' ratings of their teachers and courses: What we know and what we don't. Res. Higher Educ. 9: 199–242.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Feldman, K. A. (1989). Association between student ratings of specific instructional dimensions and student achievement: Refining and extending the synthesis of data from multisection validity studies. Res. Higher Educ. 30: 583–645.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Feldman, K. A. (1997). Identifying exemplary teachers and teaching: Evidence from student ratings. In: Perry, R. P., and Smart, J. C. (eds.), Effective Teaching in Higher Education: Research and Practice, Agathon, New York, pp. 368–395.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Franklin, J., and Theall, M. (1996). Disciplinary differences in sources of systematic variation in student ratings of instructor effectiveness and students' perceptions of the value of class preparation time: A comparison of two universities' ratings data. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.

  18. Franklin, J., Theall, M., and Ludlow, L. (1991). Grade inflation and student ratings: A closer look. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

  19. Gillmore, G. M., and Greenwald, A. G. (1994). The Effects of Course Demands and Grading Leniency on Student Ratings of Instruction, Office of Educational Assessment (94-4), University of Washington, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Greenwald, A. G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history.Am. Psychol. 35: 603–618.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Greenwald, A. G., and Gillmore, G. M. (1997). No pain, no gain? The importance of measuring course workload in student ratings of instruction. J. Educ. Psychol. 89: 743– 751.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Holmes, D. S. (1972). Effects of grades and disconfirmed grade expectancies on students' evaluations of their instructor. J. Educ. Psychol. 63: 130–133.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Howard, G. S., and Maxwell, S. E. (1980). Correlation between student satisfaction and grades: A case of mistaken causation? J. Educ. Psychol. 72: 810–820.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Koon, J., and Murray, H. S. (1996). Using multiple outcomes to validate student ratings of overall teacher effectiveness. J. Higher Educ. 66: 61–81.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students' evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. Int. J. Educ. Res. 11: 253– 288.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Marsh, H. W. (2001). Distinguishing between good (useful) and bad workloads on student evaluations of teaching. Am. Educ. Res. J. 38: 183–212.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Marsh, H. W., and Roche, L. A. (1997). Making students evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective. Am. Psychol. 52: 1187–1197.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Marsh, H. W., and Roche, L. A. (2000). Effects of grading leniency and low workloads on students' evaluations of teaching: Popular myth, bias, validity or innocent bystanders? J. Educ. Psychol. 92: 202–208.

    Google Scholar 

  29. McKeachie, W. J. (1979). Student ratings of faculty: A reprise. Academe 65: 384–397.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Neter, J., Kutner, N. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., and Wasserman, W. (1996). Applied Linear Regression Models (3rd Ed.), Irwin, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pike, G. R. (1995). The relationship between self-reports of college experiences and test scores. Res. Higher Educ. 36: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Powell, R. W. (1977). Grades, learning, and student evaluation of instruction. Res.Higher Educ. 7: 193–205.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vasta, R., and Sarmiento, R. F. (1979). Liberal grading improves evaluations but not performance. J. Educ. Psychol. 71: 207–211.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Worthington, A. G., and Wong, P. T. P. (1979). Effects of earned and assigned grades of student evaluations of an instructor. J. Educ. Psychol. 71: 764–775.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Centra, J.A. Will Teachers Receive Higher Student Evaluations by Giving Higher Grades and Less Course Work?. Research in Higher Education 44, 495–518 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025492407752

Download citation

  • student evaluations
  • college course ratings
  • expected grades
  • course difficulty