Skip to main content
Log in

Influences on Pricing and Markup in Segmented Manufacturing Markets*

  • Published:
Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The literature indicates that international manufactured product markets are segmented and imperfectly competitive. An industry pricing equation that encompasses markup pricing is constructed from flexible specifications of the firm's cost and demand functions, along with the profit-maximizing equilibrium condition. Instrumental variables estimation is carried out for 24 three-digit International Standard Industrial Classification industries, with data pooled across Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States, for the period 1970–1991. The markup model is rejected for most industries. However, something approaching a fixed markup does exist in many industries, particularly when the Herfindahl index is low. The results indicate that countries with high levels of industry concentration are more likely to have prices and markups that are influenced by competing foreign prices. Nearly all markups are either pro-cyclical or a-cyclical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, C., “An empirical model of pricing, market share and market conduct: an application to import competition in US manufacturing,” Manchester School, vol. 66, pp. 196–221, 1998.

  • Ark, Bart van and Monnikhof, E., “Size distribution of output and employment: a data set for manufacturing industries in five OECD countries, 1960–1990,” OECD Economic Department Working Papers, No. 166, 1996.

  • Beccarello, M., “Time series analysis of market power: evidence from G-7 manufacturing,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 15, pp. 123–136, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, M. and Bloch, H., “The dynamics of industrial concentration in Australian manufacturing,” International Journal of Industrial Organization vol. 18, pp. 1181–1199, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, H., “Pricing in Australian manufacturing,” The Economic Record, vol. 68, pp. 365–376, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, H. and Olive, M., “Can simple rules explain pricing behaviour in Australian manufacturing?” Australian Economic Papers, vol. 35, pp. 1–19, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, H. and Olive, M., “Pass-through elasticities for production costs and competing foreign prices: evidence from manufacturing in seven countries.” In E.I. Bairam (ed.), Production and Cost Functions: Specification, Measurement and Applications. Ashgate Publishing: Aldershot, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, H. and Olive, M., “Cyclical and competitive influences on pricing in Australian manufacturing,” Economic Record, vol. 75, pp. 268–279, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, G.E.P. and Cox, D.P., “An analysis of transformations,” Journal of Royal Statistical Society, vol. 26, pp. 211–252, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domowitz, I., Hubbard, R.G. and Peterson, B.C., “Market structure and cyclical fluctuations in U.S. manufacturing,” Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 70, pp. 55–66, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, W., Applied Ecometric Time Series. Wiley: New York, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, O. and Fromm, G., “The price equation,” American Economic Review, vol. 58, pp. 1159–1183, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, P.K. and Knetter, M.M., “Goods prices and exchange rates: what have we learned?,” Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 35, pp. 1243–1272, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W.H., Econometric Analysis. Macmillan: New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gujarati, D.N., Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill: Singapore, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R.E., “Market structure and macroeconomic fluctuations,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, vol. 2, pp. 285–338, 1986.

  • Hall, R.E., “The relations between price and marginal cost in U.S. industry,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 96, pp. 921–946, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R.E., “Invariance properties of Solow's productivity residual.” In P. Diamond (ed.), Growth, Productivity, Unemployment: Essays to Celebrate Bob Solow's Birthday. MIT Press: Cambridge MA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskel, J., Martin, C. and Small, I., “Price, marginal cost and the business cycle,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 57, pp. 25–41, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Im, K., Pesaran, M.H. and Shin, Y., “Testing of unit roots in heterogeneous panels,” Cambridge University, Cambridge (unpublished), 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olive, M., Price and Markup Behaviour in Manufacturing: A Cross-Country Study. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham UK, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliviera Martins, J., Scarpetta, S. and Pilat, D., “Mark-up pricing, market structure and the business cycle,” OECD Economic Studies, vol. 27, pp. 71–105, 1996.

  • Roeger, W., “Can imperfect competition explain the difference between primal and dual productivity measures? Estimates for U.S. manufacturing?” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 103, pp. 316–330, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, K., “The purchasing power parity puzzle,” Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 34, pp. 647–668, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, M.C., Business Pricing and Inflation. Macmillan Press: London, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, P.J., “Domestic pricing under import threat,” Applied Economics, vol. 22, pp. 221–235, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bloch, H., Olive, M. Influences on Pricing and Markup in Segmented Manufacturing Markets*. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 3, 87–107 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025482604454

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025482604454

Keywords

Navigation