, Volume 58, Issue 1, pp 35–48 | Cite as

Changing trends in publishing behaviour among university faculty, 1980-2000

  • Svein KyvikEmail author


This article analyses changes in publication patterns over a twenty-year period at Norwegian universities. Based on three surveys among academic staff; in 1982, 1992 and 2001, covering all kinds of publications, the following general conclusions are drawn: (a) co-authorship has become more common, (b) the extent of publishing directed towards an international audience has increased, (c) the scientific article in an international journal has enhanced its position as the dominating type of publication, and (d) the number of publications per academic staff member has increased. The largest changes have taken place within the social sciences, which to an increasing extent approaches the publication pattern in the natural sciences. On the other hand, the large productivity differences between individual researchers have remained remarkably stable over the two decades in all fields of learning.


Faculty Member Academic Staff Scholarly Publication Popular Science Research Book 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    P. BOURKE, L. BUTLER, B. BIGLIA, Monitoring Research in the Periphery: Australia and the ISI Indices, Research Evaluation and Policy Project Monograph Series No. 3, Research School of Social Sciences, The Australian National University.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. SANZ, I. ARAGÓN, A. MéNDEZ, The function of national journals in disseminating applied science, Journal of Information Science, 21 (1995) 319-323.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. AKSNES, J. B. REVHEIM, The application of CRIS for analyzing research output-problems and prospects, Proceedings of the CRIS 2000 Conference, Helsinki 2000.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. KYVIK, Popular science publishing, Scientometrics, 31 (1994) 143-153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. KALLEBERG, Universities: Complex bundle institutions and the projects of enlightenment, Comparative Social Research, 19 (2000) 219-255.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. KYVIK, Productivity in Academia. Scientific Publishing at Norwegian Universities, Norwegian University Press, Oslo, 1991.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Recommendations Concerning the International Standardization of Statistics on Science and Technology, UNESCO, Paris, 1978.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. KYVIK, Publiseringsvirksomheten ved universiteter og vitenskapelige høgskoler, Norwegian Institute for Studies in Research and Higher Education, Oslo, NIFU skriftserie nr. 15/2001.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. L. PAO, Lotka's law: a testing procedure, Information Processing and Management, 21 (1985) 305-320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. KYVIK, Productivity differences, fields of learning, and Lotka's law, Scientometrics, 15 (1989) 205-214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. J. LOTKA, The frequency distribution of scientific productivity, Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16 (1926) 317-323.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. S. PRICE, Little Science, Big Science, Columbia University Press, New York, 1963.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. MERTON, The ambivalence of scientists, In: N. KAPLAN (Ed.), Science and Society, Rand McNally & Company, Chicago, 1965.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. S. KATZ, B. R. MARTIN, What is research collaboration?, Research Policy, 26 (1997) 1-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. SIVERTSEN, Internasjonalt samarbeid i publikasjoner, I. Det norske forsknings-og innovasjonssystemet statistikk og indikatorer (2001) 143-149.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. ZITT, E. BASSECOULARD, Internationalization of communication. A view on the evolution of scientific journals, Scientometrics, 46 (1999) 669-685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. HICKS, The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences, Scientometrics, 44 (1999) 193-215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. KYVIK, Internationality of the social sciences: the Norwegian case, International Social Science Journal, 115 (1988) 163-172.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers/Akadémiai Kiadó 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norwegian Institute for Studies in Research and Higher EducationOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations