Abstract
The traditional approach to understanding early diagenetic processes in sediments has generally been to analyze pore water and solid phases from a single core on depth scales of centimeters. The resulting data is then modeled using the approximations of lateral homogeneity and steady-state conditions. However, the continuing advancement of the field of benthic biogeochemistry and development of new microelectrode analytic techniques are clearly demonstrating that in many sedimentary environments a more sophisticated approach to measure the spatial and temporal variability is necessary. Although no one approach is appropriate for all situations, a scaling method is presented, with examples, in this study for determining appropriate sampling intervals in time and space that has considerable utility for investigating early changes in sediment geochemistry in complex natural systems. This approach is derived from scaling techniques that have been developed by physical oceanographers for the study of processes in the water column where many analogous sampling problems are encountered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berner, R. A., 1964. An idealized model of dissolved sulfate distribution in recent sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 28: 1497-1503.
Berner, R. A., 1974. Kinetic models for the early diagenesis of nitrogen, sulfur, phosphorus and silicon in anoxic marine sediments. In Goldberg, E. D. (ed.), The Sea V. John Wiley & Sons, New York: 427-450.
Berner, R. A., 1980. Early Diagenesis. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. 241 pp.
Brendel, P. J. & G. W. Luther, III, 1995. Development of a gold amalgam voltammetric microelectrode for the determination of dissolved Fe, Mn, O2, and S(-II) in porewaters of marine and freshwater sediments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 29: 751-761.
Boudreau, B. P., 1997. Diagenetic Models and Implementation. Spring-Verlag, New York. 414. pp.
Cooper, D. C. & J.W. Morse, 1996. The chemistry of Offatts Bayou, Texas: A seasonally highly sulfidic basin. Estuaries 19: 595-611.
Denman, K. L. & H. J. Freeland, 1985. Correlation scales, objective mapping and a statistical test of geostrophy over the continental shelf. J. mar. Res. 43: 517-539.
DiMarco, S. F., W. D. Nowlin, Jr. & R. O. Reid, 2002. Horizontal spatial scales of hydrographic data and current velocity in the Northeast Gulf of Mexico. Unpublished manuscript.
Eldridge, P. M. & J. W. Morse, 2000. A diagenetic model for sediment-seagrass interactions. Mar. Chem. 70: 89-104.
Hebert, A. B. & J. W. Morse (2003). Microscale effects of light on redox zonation in seagrass vegetated sediments. Mar. Chem. 8: 1-9.
Hsu, H. P., 1984. Applied Fourier Analysis. Hartcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, San Diego, CA. 223 pp.
Jochens, A. E., W. D. Nowlin, Jr., S. F. DiMarco, R. O. Reid & M. K. Howard, 2002. Northeast Gulf of Mexico Chemical Oceanography and Hydrography Study: Synthesis Report. OCS Study mmS 2002-xxx, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Mineral Management Service, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region, New Orleans, LA.
Li, Y., W. D. Nowlin, Jr. & R. O. Reid, 1996. Spatial-scale analysis of hydrographic data over the Texas-Louisiana continental shelf. J. Geophys. Res. 101: 20595-20605.
Povlain, P.-M., 1989. Statistical analysis of the surface circulation of the California Current system using satellite-tracker drifters. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 19: 1588-1603.
Shuttleworth, S. M., W. Davison & J. Hamilton-Taylor, 1999. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33: 4169-4175.
Wu, J., 1999. Hierarchy and scaling: extrapolating information along a scaling ladder. Can. J. Remote Sens. 25: 367-380.
Wu, J. & Y. Qi, 2000. Dealing with scale in landscape analysis: an overview. Geogr. Info. Sci. 6: 1-7.
Wu, J., D.E. Jelinski, M. Luck & P. T. Tueller, 2000. Multiscale analysis of landscape heterogeneity: scale variance and pattern metrics. Geogr. Info. Sci. 6: 1-19.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morse, J.W., DiMarco, S.F., Hebert, A.B. et al. A scaling approach to spatial variability in early diagenetic processes. Hydrobiologia 494, 25–29 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025468921821
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025468921821