Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison between visual and computer-assisted analysis

  • Editorial Commentary
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Staal EM, der Heer M, Jukema W, et al. End-diastolic and end-systolic volume from the left ventricular angiogram: how accurate is visual frame selection? Comparison between visual and computer-assisted analysis. Int J Card Imag 2003.

  2. Bhargava V, Shabetai R. Non-uniformity of the LV ellipsoid implications for area-length volume calculations. IEEE Comp Cardiol 1979; 351–354.

  3. Marier DL, Gibson DG. Limitations of two-frame method for displaying regional left ventricular wall motion in man. Br Heart J 1980; 44: 555–559.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bhargava, V., Bhalla, M.A. Comparison between visual and computer-assisted analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 19, 267–269 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025433610506

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025433610506

Navigation