Abstract
During the period of 1992 to 1996, the cable television industry in the United States was regulated by the FCC, which took several price cap measures. As a result, the increase in the price cable service substantially slowed. However, the cable demand did not rise as anticipated. Using a model of imperfectly discriminating monopoly, the paper empirically investigates this curious phenomenon of stagnant demand despite lower prices. The paper finds that the FCC's price capping constrained both demand and prices. The demand was constrained since the price cap was designed to cover almost all TV channels carried by cable systems, and subsequently discouraged cable systems from meeting different customer preferences with multi-tier services.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Besanko, D., Donnenfeld, S., and White, L., “The multiproduct firm, quality choice, and regulation,” Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 36, pp. 411–429, 1988.
Cooper, R., “On allocative distortion in problems of self-selection,” RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 15, pp. 568–577, 1984.
Crandall, R.W. and Furchtgott-Roth, H., Cable TV: Regulation or Competition? The Brookings Institution: Washington, DC, 1996.
Crawford, G.S., “The impact of cable act on household demand and welfare,” RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 31, pp. 422–449, 2000.
Donnenfeld, S. and White, L., “Product variety and the inefficiency of monopoly,” Economica, vol. 55, pp. 393–401, 1988.
General Accounting Office, National Survey of Cable Television Rates and Services, GAO/RCED, pp. 89–193, 1989.
General Accounting Office, Follow-Up National Survey of Cable Television Rates and Services, GAO/RCED, pp. 90-199, 1990.
General Accounting Office, Cable Television Survey, GAO/RCED, pp. 91–195, 1991.
Hazlert, T.W., “Prices and outputs under cable TV regulation,” Journal of Regulatory Economics, vol. 12, pp. 173–195, 1997.
Maskin, E. and Riley, J., “Monopoly with incomplete information,” RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 15, pp. 171–196, 1984.
Mayo, J.W. and Y. Otsuka., “Demand, pricing, and regulation: evidence from cable TV industry,” RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 22, pp. 396–410, 1991.
Mussa, M. and Rosen, S., “Monopoly and product quality,” Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 18, pp. 301–317, 1978.
Otsuka, Y., “Another look at local franchise regulation and state commission regulation: do they really matter?” Review of Industrial Organization, vol. 15, pp. 341–356, 1999.
Ruvinovitz, R.N., “Market power and price increases for basic cable service since deregulation,” RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 24, pp. 1–18, 1993.
Srinagesh, P. and Bradburd, R.M., “Quality distortion by a discriminating monopolist,” American Economic Review, vol. 79, pp. 96–105, 1989.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Otsuka, Y., Braun, B.M. Price Cap Regulation in the Cable Television Industry: Why was the Demand Stagnant?. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 3, 41–55 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025426403545
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025426403545