Vertical Restructuring (or Not) of the Infrastructure Sectors of Transition Economies

  • Russell Pittman
Article

Abstract

One important determinant of the speed and success of transition will be the efficiency of transformation and development of the infrastructure sectors. A great deal of attention has been paid to issues such as privatization, restructuring, user prices, and terms of access in these sectors, regarding both developed and developing countries. Somewhat less attention has been devoted to issues regarding vertical restructuring, which are notable in the degree to which in different sectors and in different locations they raise similar questions that may have very different answers. This paper suggests a framework for answering such questions and seeks to apply it to the railroad, electricity, and telecommunications sectors in transition economies.

vertical restructuring competition regulation infrastructure transition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Banker, R.D., Chang, H.-H., and Majumdar, S.K., “Economies of scope in the U.S. telecommunications industry,” Information Economics and Policy, vol. 10, pp. 253–272, 1998.Google Scholar
  2. Berg, S.V. and Tschirhart, J., “A market test for natural monopoly in local exchange,” Journal of Regulatory Economics, vol. 8, pp. 103–124, 1995.Google Scholar
  3. Bitzan, J., “Railroad cost conditions—implications for policy.” Prepared for the Federal Railroad Administration, US Department of Transportation, 10 May 2000.Google Scholar
  4. Bloch, H., Madden, G., and Savage, S.J., “Economies of scale and scope in Australian telecommunications,” Review of Industrial Organization, vol. 18, pp. 219–227, 2001.Google Scholar
  5. Bradshaw, W.P., “Competition in the rail industry,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 13, pp. 93–103, 1997.Google Scholar
  6. Brennan, T.J., “Why regulated firms should be kept out of unregulated markets: Understanding the divestiture in United States v. AT&T,” Antitrust Bulletin, vol. 32, pp. 741–793, 1987.Google Scholar
  7. Brennan, T.J., “Is the theory behind U.S. v. AT&T applicable today?” Antitrust Bulletin, vol. 40, pp. 455–482, 1995.Google Scholar
  8. Briceño, C.M., Efficiency Measurement for Regulatory Market-Structure Regimes of the Electric Power Industry. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University, April 2002.Google Scholar
  9. Buchler, S., “How to regulate vertical market structure in network industries.” Unpublished paper, Socioeconomic Institute at the University of Zurich, June 18, 2001.Google Scholar
  10. Bush, J. and Spiro, N., “New rules: A survey of telecoms,” Business Central Europe, vol. 7no. 75, pp. 51–60, 2000.Google Scholar
  11. Business Central Europe, “The annual 2001”.Google Scholar
  12. Carter, M. and Wright, J., “Interconnection in network industries,” Review of Industrial Organization, vol. 14, pp. 1–25, 1999.Google Scholar
  13. Day, C.J. and Bunn, D.W., “Divestiture of generation assets in the electricity pool of England and Wales: a computational approach to analyzing market power,” Journal of Regulatory Economics, vol. 19, pp. 123–141, 2001.Google Scholar
  14. European Conference of Ministers of Transport (ECMT), Rail Restructuring in Europe, Paris: ECMT, 1998.Google Scholar
  15. Ennis, S., “Competition and price dispersion in international long distance calling,” US Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Economic Analysis Group Discussion Paper 01–3, April 23, 2001.Google Scholar
  16. Estache, A., Goldstein, A., and Pittman, R., “Privatization and regulatory reform in Brazil: the case of freight railways,” Journal of Industry, Competition, and Trade, vol. 1, pp. 203–235, 2001.Google Scholar
  17. US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Regional Transmission Organizations, Docket No. RM99-2-000, Washington: May 13, 1999.Google Scholar
  18. Freebairn, J., “Access prices for rail infrastructure,” Economic Record, vol. 74, pp. 286–296, 1998.Google Scholar
  19. Gabel, D., “Private Telecommunications Networks: An Historical Perspective.” In E. Noam and A. Níshúilleabháin, (eds), Public Networks, Public Objectives, Elsevier, 1996.Google Scholar
  20. Gabel, D. and Kennet, D.M., “Economies of scope in the local telephone exchange market,” Journal of Regulatory Economics, vol. 6, pp. 381–398, 1994.Google Scholar
  21. García de Alba, P., “Competition issues in the privatization of the Mexican railroads.” Remarks prepared for the Seminar on Railway Reform, Restructuring and Competition, Moscow, 4–5 December 2000.Google Scholar
  22. Hansson, L. and Nilsson, J.-E., “A new Swedish railroad policy: Separation of infrastructure and traffic production,” Transportation Research-A, vol. 25A, pp. 153–159, 1991.Google Scholar
  23. Harris, R.G. and Kraft, C.J., “Meddling through: regulating local telephone competition in the United States,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 11, pp. 93–112, 1997.Google Scholar
  24. Hausman, J.A., “Valuing the effect of regulation on new services in telecommunications,” Brookings Papers: Microeconomics, pp. 1–38, 1997.Google Scholar
  25. Hayashi, P.M., Goo, J.Y.-J., and Chamberlain, W.C., “Vertical economies: the case of U.S. electric utility industry, 1983–87,” Southern Economic Journal, vol. 63, pp. 710–725, 1997.Google Scholar
  26. Heller, W.B. and McCubbins, M.D., “Politics, institutions, and outcomes: electricity regulation in Argentina and Chile,” Journal of Policy Reform, vol. 1, pp. 357–387, 1996.Google Scholar
  27. Hsing, Y. and Mixon, F.G., Jr., “Price convergence in contestable market structures: The impact of time and price-caps on intercity telecommunications rates,” Review of Industrial Organization, vol. 9, pp. 813–822, 1994.Google Scholar
  28. Humphreys, E. and Birch, I., “Extending TERFFs to Central and Eastern Europe,” Arup Journal, pp. 16–17, 2000.Google Scholar
  29. Ivaldi, M. and McCullough, G.J., “Density and integration effects on class I U.S. freight railroads,” Journal of Regulatory Economics, vol. 19, pp. 161–182, 2001.Google Scholar
  30. Joskow, P.L., “Restructuring, competition and regulatory reform in the U.S. electricity sector,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 11, pp. 119–138, 1997.Google Scholar
  31. Joskow, P.L., “California's electricity crisis,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 17, pp. 265–388, 2002.Google Scholar
  32. Kahn, A.E., The Economics of Regulation: Principles and Institutions, Wiley: New York, 1971 (repr. 1988).Google Scholar
  33. Kaserman, D.L. and Mayo, J.W., “The measurement of vertical economies and the efficient structure of the electric utility industry,” Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 39, pp. 483–502, 1991.Google Scholar
  34. Kerf, M. and Geradin, D., “Post-liberalization challenges in telecommunications: balancing antitrust and sector-specific regulation,” World Competition, vol. 23, pp. 27–77, 2000.Google Scholar
  35. Kirby, M.W., The Origins of Railway Enterprise: The Stockton and Darlington Railway, 1821–1863, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1993.Google Scholar
  36. Knittel, C.R., “Interstate long distance rates: search costs, switching costs, and market power,” Review of Industrial Organization, vol. 12, pp. 519–536, 1997.Google Scholar
  37. Kopicki, R. and Thompson, L.S., Best Methods of Railway Restructuring and Privatization, World Bank: Washington, CFS Discussion Paper Series 111, August 1995.Google Scholar
  38. Kwoka, J.E., “Vertical economies in electric power: evidence on integration and its alternatives,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 20, pp. 653–671, 2002.Google Scholar
  39. Laffont, J.-J. and Tirole, J., Competition in Telecommunications, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 2000.Google Scholar
  40. Laffont, J.-J., Rey, P. and Tirole, J., “Network competition: I. Overview and nondiscriminatory pricing,” RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 29, pp. 1–37, 1998.Google Scholar
  41. Lardner, D., Railway Economy: A Treatise on the New Art of Transport, Taylor, Walton & Maberly: London, 1850 (repr. Augustus M. Kelley: New York, 1968).Google Scholar
  42. Lee, B.-J., “Separability test for the electricity supply industry,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 10, pp. 49–60, 1995.Google Scholar
  43. MacAvoy, P.W., “Testing for competitiveness of markets for long distance telephone services: Competition finally?” Review of Industrial Organization, vol. 13, pp. 295–319, 1998.Google Scholar
  44. Mercer Management Consulting, Restructuring the Polish State Railways (PKP), Lexington, MA, January 1992.Google Scholar
  45. Newbery, D.M., “Competition and regulation in the electricity industry.” Paper prepared for the OECD/World Bank Conference on Competition and Regulation in Network Infrastructure Industries, Budapest, June 1994a.Google Scholar
  46. Newbery, D.M., “Restructuring and privatizing electric utilities in Eastern Europe,” Economics of Transition, vol. 2, pp. 291–316, 1994b.Google Scholar
  47. Newbery, D.M., Privatization, Restructuring, and Regulation of Network Utilities, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1999.Google Scholar
  48. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Regulatory Reform in Electricity, Road and Rail Freight in the Czech Republic, Committee on Competition Law and Policy, Working Party No. 2 on Competition and Regulation, January 25, 2001a.Google Scholar
  49. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Regulatory Reform: The Poland Country Review, Committee on Competition Law and Policy, May 15, 2001b.Google Scholar
  50. Ordover, J.A. and Pittman, R.W., “Restructuring the railway for competition.” Paper prepared for the OECD/World Bank Conference on Competition and Regulation in Network Infrastructure Industries, Budapest, June 1994. Earlier version published in Polish as “Restrukturyzacja Polskich Kolei Państwowych,” Przeglad Organizacji, vol. 1, pp. 23–25, 1994.Google Scholar
  51. Parry, R.H.N., “Vertical integration, competition and efficiency: The case of the rail industry,” Kobe University Economic Review, vol. 43, pp. 73–92, 1997.Google Scholar
  52. Pinkepank, J.A., “When (and where and why) railroads share track,” Trains, pp. 20–29, January 1979.Google Scholar
  53. Pittman, R.W., “Railroads and competition: The Santa Fe/Southern Pacific merger proposal,” Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 39, pp. 25–46, 1990.Google Scholar
  54. Pittman, R.W., “Railway competition: options for the Russian federation.” Paper presented at Seminar on Railway Reform, Restructuring and Competition, Moscow, 4–5 December 2000. Published in Russian in ECO, vol. 8, pp. 13–29, 2001.Google Scholar
  55. Pittman, R.W., “Restructurarea căilor ferate române—pe orizontală, nu pe verticală,” Oeconomica, pp. 289–297, 2002.Google Scholar
  56. Pittman, R.W., “Reforma Regiilor Autonome: Trebuie România să adopte noua ortodoxie a separărilor pe verticală?” Oeconomica, 2003a.Google Scholar
  57. Pittman, R.W., “A Note on Non-Discriminatory Access to Railroad Infrastructure.” U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Economic Analysis Group Discussion Paper 03–5, April 2003bGoogle Scholar
  58. Pupillo, L. and Conte, A., “The economics of local loop architecture for multimedia services,” Information Economics and Policy, vol. 10, pp. 107–126, 1998.Google Scholar
  59. Ringskog, K., “Discussion.” In OECD/World Bank Conference on Competition and Regulation in Network Infrastructure Industries, Budapest, June 1994.Google Scholar
  60. Savignat, M.G. and Nash, C., “The case for rail reform in Europe: evidence from studies of production characteristics of the rail industry,” International Journal of Transport Economics, vol. 26, pp. 201–217, 1999.Google Scholar
  61. Schwartz, M., “Telecommunications Reform in the United States: Promises and Pitfalls.” In P. Welfens and G. Yarrow (eds), Telecommunications and Energy in Systemic Transformation, Springer Verlag: Heidelberg, 1996.Google Scholar
  62. Shin, R.T. and Ying, J.S., “Unnatural monopolies in local telephone,” RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 23, pp. 171–183, 1992.Google Scholar
  63. Simmons, J. and Biddle, G. (eds), The Oxford Companion to British Railway History, Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1997.Google Scholar
  64. Spiller, P. and Cardilli, C., “The frontier of telecommunications deregulation: small countries leading the pack,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 11, pp. 127–138, 1997.Google Scholar
  65. Sung, N. and Gort, M., “Economies of scale and natural monopoly in the U.S. local telephone industry,” Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 82, pp. 694–697, 2000.Google Scholar
  66. Sung, N. and Lee, Y.-H., “Substitution between mobile and fixed telephones in Korea,” Review of Industrial Organization, vol. 20, pp. 367–374, 2002.Google Scholar
  67. Trebing, H.M., “Electricity: changes and issues,” Review of Industrial Organization, vol. 17, pp. 61–74, 2000.Google Scholar
  68. Tysklind, A., “The Swedish rail reforms and developments in the EU.” Remarks prepared for the OECD Seminar on Railway Reform, Restructuring and Competition, Moscow, December 2000.Google Scholar
  69. von Hirschhausen, C., Modernizing Infrastructure in Transformation Economies: Paving the Way to European Enlargement, Edward Elgar: Northampton, MA, 2002.Google Scholar
  70. von Hirschhausen, C. and Meinhart, B., “Infrastructure policies and liberalization in the East European transition countries—would less have been more?” Unpublished paper, DIW-Berlin (German Institute for Economic Research), 2001.Google Scholar
  71. von Hirschhausen, C. and Opitz, P., “Power utility re-regulation in East European and CIS transformation countries (1990–1999): An institutional interpretation,” Berlin, DIW (German Institute for Economic Research), Discussion Paper 2001.Google Scholar
  72. Wallsten, S., “Ringing in the 20th century: the effects of state monopolies, private ownership, and operating licenses on telecommunications in Europe, 1982–1914,” Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper 00-37, June 2001.Google Scholar
  73. Waters, W.G., II, “Rail Cost Analysis.” In K.J. Button, and D.E. Pitfield (eds), International Railway Economics, Gower: Aldershot, 1985.Google Scholar
  74. Welsby, J. and Nichols, A., “The privatization of Britain's railways: An inside view,” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, vol. 33, pp. 55–76, 1999.Google Scholar
  75. White, L.J., “The deregulation of the telephone industry: The lessons from the U.S. railroad deregulation experience.” In R. Sato, R.V. Ramachandran, and K. Mino (eds), Global Competition and Integration, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999.Google Scholar
  76. Wilner, F.N., “Competitive access: lessons from Great Britain,” Journal of Transportation Law, Logistics and Policy, vol. 65, pp. 182–191, 1998.Google Scholar
  77. Wolak, F.A., “Report on Electricity Industry Restructuring in Romania.” In I. Kessides (ed.), Romania: Regulatory and Structural Assessment in the Network Utilities, World Bank: Washington, June 15, 2000.Google Scholar
  78. World Bank, World Development Report 2002: Building Institutions for Markets, World Bank: Washington, DC, 2001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Russell Pittman
    • 1
  1. 1.Economic Analysis Group, Antitrust DivisionU.S. Dept. JusticeWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations