Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Distribution of benthic diatoms in relation to environmental variables in lowland streams

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The composition (% relative abundance) of diatom assemblages from soft bottom sediments was studied at 75 sites situated in 46 rivers, brooks, and ditches in the islands of Hiiumaa and Saaremaa and in the lowland of West Estonia. Although the total number of recorded taxa was 205, the studied diatom assemblages consisted of 54, 55, 48, and 50 constant species in the drainage basin of Moonsund, the Gulf of Riga, Hiiumaa, and Saaremaa, respectively. The habitats of the dominating taxa were heterogenous and the most widespread species were Achnanthidium minutissimum, Martyana martyi, Meridion circulare, Cocconeis placentula, Planothidium lanceolatum, and Amphora pediculus. The Shannon–Weaver diversity (H′) index varied from 2.09 to 4.63. Multivariate analyses were used to identify the environmental variables governing the composition and structure of the benthic diatom assemblage. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Redundancy Analysis (RDA), based on 56 most abundant taxa, indicated differences in the composition and structure of diatom assemblages between different drainage basins as well as between the upper and lower stream courses. In the headwaters there prevailed small epipsammic diatoms (Martyana, Planothidium, Staurosira, Staurosirella). Different motile epipelic species from the genera Amphora, Navicula, Nitzschia, etc. were distributed abundantly in the lower courses of the streams. There was a positive correlation between order of the stream site and trophic level of water (R=0.35; p<0.05). Along a river system, the increasing order of the stream was accompanied by higher trophic level of water.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alles, E., M. Nörpel–Schempp & H. Lange–Bertalot, 1991. Zur Systematic und Ökologie chakteristischer Eunotia–Arten (Bacillariophyceae) in elektrolytarmen Bachoberläufen. Nova Hedwigia 53: 171–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. H., C. E. Gibby & M. Hickman, 1972. Photosynthetic rhythms in epipelic algal populations. Br. Phycol. J. 7: 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chessman, B. C., 1986. Diatom flora of an Australian river system: spatial patterns and environmental relationships. Freshwat. Biol. 16: 805–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descy, J. P., 1979. A new approach to water quality estimation using diatoms. Nova Hedwigia Beih. 64: 305–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • EJOKN, 1986. Eesti NSV jõgede, ojade ja kraavide ametlik nimestik. Valgus, Tallinn: 72 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg, C. & S. O. Ryding, 1980. Eutrophication parameters and trophic status indices in 30 Swedish waste–receiving lakes. Arch. Hydrobiol. 89: 189–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, N., 1998. Use of epipelic diatoms for evaluation of water quality in the Matanza–Riachuelo (Argentina), a Pampean plain river. Wat. Res. 32: 2029–2034.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, N., 1999. Epipelic diatoms from the Matanza–Riachuelo river (Argentina), a highly polluted basin from the pampean plain: biotic indices and multivariate analysis. Aquatic Ecosystem Helth & Management 2: 301–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, N. D., T. A. McMahon & B. L. Fintayson, 1994. Stream Hydrology. An Introduction for Ecologists. John Wiley & Sons. Chichester, New York, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapure: 526 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasshoff, K., M. Ehrhardt & K. Kremling (eds), 1983. Methods of Seawater Analyses, 2. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim: 419 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hang, T & A. Loopmann, 1995. Jõed. In Raukas, A. (ed.), Eesti Loodus. Valgus, Tallinn: 292–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hustedt, F., 1930–1966. Die Kieselalgen Deutschlands, Österreichs und der Schweiz unter Berücksichtigung der übrigen Länder Europas sowie der angrenzenden Meeresgebiete. Teil 1–3. Dr. L. Rabenhorsts Kryptogamen–Flora. 7/1: 920 pp., 7/2: 845 pp., 7/3: 816 pp.

  • Jeffrey, S. W. & G. F. Humphrey, 1975. New spectrophotometric equations for determing chlorophyll a, b, c1 and c2 in higher plants, algae and natural phytoplankton. Biochem. Physiol. Planzen (BPP): 167 pp.

  • Järvekülg, A., 1993. Trophy of the water of Estonian rivers and nutrient limiting the primary production. Water pollution and quality in Estonia. Environmental Report 7: 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Järvekülg, A., 2001. Eesti Jõed. Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus, Tartu: 750 pp.

  • Kawecka, B., 1971. Zonal distribution of algal communities in streams of the Polish High Tatra Mountains. Acta Hydrobiol. 13: 393–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M. G., A. Cazaubon, E. Coring, A. Dell’Uomo, L. Ector, B. Goldsmith, H. Guasch, J. Hürlimann, A. Jarlman, B. Kawecka, J. Kwandrans, R. Laugaste, E.–A. Lindstrøm, M. Leitao, P. Marvan, J. Padisák, E. Pipp, J. Prygiel, E. Rott, S. Sabater, H. van Dam & J. Vizinet, 1998. Recommendations for the routine sampling of diatoms for water quality assessments in Europe. J. appl. Phycol. 10: 215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krammer, K. & H. Lange–Bertalot, 1986–1991. Bacillariophycea. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena: 1986, 2/1: 876 pp.; 1988, 2/2: 596 pp.; 1991, 2/3: 575 pp.; 1991, 2/4: 437 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, G. J., 1967. Determination of chlorophyll and pheopigments: spectrophotometric equations. Limnol. Oceanogr. 12: 343–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loopmann, A., 1979. Eesti NSV jõgede nimestik. Valgus, Tallinn: 157 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manly, B. F. J., 1997. Distance matrices and spatial data. In: Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology, Chapman and Hall, London: 172–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margalef, R., 1960. Ideas for a synthetic approach to the ecology of running waters. Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. 45: 133–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. G. & N. C. Tuchman, 1992. Substratum–associated microbiota. Water Environ. Res. 64: 625–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potapova, M., 1996. Epilithic algal communities in rivers of Kolyma Mountains, NE Siberia, Russia. Nova Hedwigia 63: 309–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piirsoo, K., 2001. Phytoplankton of Estonian rivers in midsummer. Hydrobiologia 444: 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Round, F. E., 1965. The epipsammon; a relatively unknown freshwater algal association. Br. Phycol. Bull. 2: 456–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Round, F. E., R. M. Crawford & D. G. Mann, 1990. The Diatoms. Biology and morphology of the genera. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 747 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snoeijs, P. (ed.), 1993. Intercalibration and Distribution of Diatom Species in the Baltic Sea. Opulus Press, Uppsala 1: 129 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snoeijs, P. & N. Balashova (eds), 1998. Intercalibration and Distribution of Diatom Species in the Baltic Sea. Opulus Press, Uppsala 5: 144 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snoeijs, P. & J. Kasperovičiené (eds), 1996. Intercalibration and Distribution of Diatom Species in the Baltic Sea. Opulus Press Uppsala 4: 126 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snoeijs, P. & M. Potapova (eds), 1995. Intercalibration and Distribution of Diatom Species in the Baltic Sea. Opulus Press, Uppsala 3: 126 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snoeijs, P. & S. Vilbaste (eds), 1994. Intercalibration and Distribution of Diatom Species in the Baltic Sea. Opulus Press, Uppsala 2: 125 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, R. J. & S. Hashim, 1989. Variation in diatom community structure among habitats in sandy streams. J. Phycol. 25: 678–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickland, J. D. H. & T. R. A. Parsons, 1960. A manual of seawater analysis. Bull. Fish. Res, Board Can. 125: 185 pp.

  • ter Braak, C. J. F., 1990. Update notes: CANOCO version 3.1. Agricultural Mathematics Group, Wageningen: 95 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak, C. J. F., 1994. Canonical community ordination. Part 1. Basic theory and linear methods. Ecoscience 1: 127–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak, C. J. F. & P. F. M. Verdonschot, 1995. Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquat. Sci. 57: 255–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiolouse, J., D. Chessel, S. Doledes & J.–M. Olivier, 1997. ADE–4: a multivariate analysis and graphical display software. Statistics and Computing 7: 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viiding, H., 1995. Pealiskord ja selle ehitus. In Raukas, A. (ed.), Eesti Loodus. Valgus, Tallinn: 46–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilbaste, S., 2000. Ränivetikad–kõige mitmekesisem vetikarühm Eesti jõgedes. In Frey, T. (ed.), Kaasaegse Ökoloogia Probleemid: Loodusteaduslikud Ülevaated Eesti Maa Päeval. Tartu 8: 295–300.

  • Vilbaste, S., 2001. Benthic diatom communities in Estonian rivers. Boreal Environ. Res. 6: 191–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilbaste, S., 2001a. Jõgede mikrofütobentos. Klorofüll ja feopigmendid põhjasetteis. In Järvekülg, A. (ed.), Eesti Jõed. Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus, Tartu: 141–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilbaste S., K. Sundbäck, C. Nilsson & J. Truu, 2000. Distribution of benthic diatoms in the littoral zone of the Gulf of Riga, the Baltic Sea. Eur. J. Phycol. 35: 373–384.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Zoology and Botany, Estonian Agricultural University, Riia 181, 51014, Tartu, Estonia

    Sirje Vilbaste

  2. Environmental Protection Institute, Estonian Agricultural University, Kreutzwaldi 5, 51014, Tartu, Estonia

    Jaak Truu

Authors
  1. Sirje Vilbaste
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jaak Truu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vilbaste, S., Truu, J. Distribution of benthic diatoms in relation to environmental variables in lowland streams. Hydrobiologia 493, 81–93 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025401716441

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025401716441

Search

Navigation