Abstract
Using the work of Józef Bocheński as apositive example, this paper sets out the casefor a balanced use of historical knowledge indoing analytic philosophy. Between the twoextremes of relativizing historicism, whichdenies absolute truth, and arrogant scientism,which denies any constructive role for thehistory of ideas in philosophy, lies a viamedia in which historical reflection onconcepts and their history is placed at theservice of the system of cognitive philosophy.Knowledge of the history of philosophy, whilenot a sine qua non, can empower analyticphilosophy to push forward to new and moresatisfactory solutions to old and new problems.Examples are adduced from Bocheński's oeuvreand from the author's own experience.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bocheński, J.M. “O ‘relatywizmie’ logistycznym,” in Mysl katolicka wobec logiki wspólczesnej (Studia Gnesnensiana, Vol. 15), Poznan, 1937, pp. 87-111. Quoted in the French translation “Le relativisme logistique” from http://www. fmag.unict.it/PolPhil/Cracow/PensCathol.html
Bocheński, J.M. “The Problem of Universals,” in The Problem of Universals: A Symposium (with I.M. Bocheński, A. Church, N. Goodman), University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, 1956, pp. 33-57.
Bocheński, J.M. Entre la logique et la foi, Noir sur Blanc, Montrichter, 1990.
Frege, G. 1984. Collected Papers. Oxford: Blackwell.
Simons, P.M. “Metaphysical Systematics: A Lesson from Whitehead,” Erkenntnis 48 (1998), pp. 377-393.
Whitehead, A.N. Process and Reality (corrected edn.), Free Press, New York, 1978.
Williams, B. “Why Philosophy Needs History,” London Review of Books, 17 October 2002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Simons, P. Bocheński and Balance: System and History in Analytic Philosophy. Studies in East European Thought 55, 281–297 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025344204927
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025344204927