Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 163–182 | Cite as

Emotional Expressivity and Trustworthiness: The Role of Nonverbal Behavior in the Evolution of Cooperation

  • R. Thomas Boone
  • Ross Buck


Previous research has found that high emotional expressivity contributes to interpersonal attraction independently of and on par with the contributions of physical attractiveness. Using an evolutionary perspective, we argue that emotional expressivity can act as a marker for cooperative behavior or trustworthiness. Theoretical and empirical work from social dilemma research pointing to the advantages of having a signal for cooperation is considered, as well as research from the limited number of studies that have looked at expressive behavior within a social exchange context. We also argue that we need to inject nonverbal emotional behavior into the social dilemma paradigm, which has downplayed or ignored its role in the communication processes associated with cooperation. Finally, we offer an outline for testing our theory and expanding the role of nonverbal emotional processes within research on cooperation and social exchange.

cooperation emotional expressivity evolutionary theory nonverbal communication trustworthiness 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 2, 256–274.Google Scholar
  2. Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64 (3), 431–441.Google Scholar
  3. Bond, C. F., Berry, D. S., & Omar, A. (1994). The kernel of truth in judgments of deceptiveness. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15(4), 523–534.Google Scholar
  4. Boone, R. T., & Macy, M. W. (1999). Unlocking the doors of the prisoner's dilemma: Dependence, selectivity, and cooperation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62(1), 32–52.Google Scholar
  5. Brunswik, E. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional theory. Psychological Review, 62, 193–217.Google Scholar
  6. Buck, R. (1977). Nonverbal communication accuracy in preschool children: Relationships with personality and skin conductance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 225–236.Google Scholar
  7. Buck, R. (1979). Individual differences in nonverbal sending accuracy and electrodermal responding: The Externalizing-Internalizing dimension. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.), Skill in nonverbal communication: Individual differences. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn, & Hain.Google Scholar
  8. Buck, R. (1984). The communication of emotion. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  9. Buck, R., Goldman, C. K., Easton, C. J., & Norelli Smith, N. (1998). Social learning and emotional education: Emotional expression and communication in behaviorally-disordered children and schizophrenic patients. In W. F. Flack & J. D. Laird (Eds.), Emotions in psychopathology (pp. 298–314). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bugental, D. E., Love, L. R., & Gianetto, R. M. (1971). Perfidious feminine faces. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 17, 314–318.Google Scholar
  11. Burnham, T., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. (2000). Friend-or-foe intentionality priming in an extensive form trust game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 43, 57–73.Google Scholar
  12. Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 163–228). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Darwin, C. (1872/1998). The expression of the emotions in man and animals (3rdEd.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dawes, R. M., McTavish, J., & Shaklee, H. (1977). Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in commons dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 1–11.Google Scholar
  15. Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dawkins, R., & Krebs, J. R. (1978). Animal signals: Information or manipulation? In J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies (Eds.), Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach (pp. 282–309). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
  17. DePaulo, B. M. (1992). Nonverbal behavior and self-presentation. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 203–243.Google Scholar
  18. DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–112.Google Scholar
  19. DePaulo, B. M., Stone, J. I., & Lassiter, G. D. (1985). Deceiving and detecting deceit. In B. R. Schlenker (Ed.), The self and social life (pp. 323–370). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  20. Forgas, J. P. (1998). On feeling good and getting your way: Mood effects on negotiation cognition and bargaining strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 565–577.Google Scholar
  21. Frank, R. (1988). Passions within reason: The strategic role of the emotions. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  22. Frank, R. (2001). Cooperation through emotional commitment. In R. M. Hesse (Ed.), Evolution and the capacity for commitment (pp. 57–76). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Frank, R., Gilovich, T., & Regan, D. T. (1993). The evolution of one-shot cooperation: An experiment. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 247–256.Google Scholar
  24. Hamilton, W. D. (1963). The evolution of altruistic behavior. American Naturalist, 97, 354–356.Google Scholar
  25. Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 31, 295–311.Google Scholar
  26. Hardin, R. (2002). Trust and trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  27. Hauser, M. D. (1996). The evolution of communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hertel, G. (1999). Mood effects in social dilemmas: What we know so far. In M. Foddy, M. Smithson, S. Schneider, & M. Hogg (Eds.), Resolving social dilemmas: Dynamic, structural, and intergroup aspects (pp. 227–243). Philadelphia: Psychological Press.Google Scholar
  29. Krebs, J. R., & Davies, N. B. (1984). Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
  30. Kurzban, R. (2001). The social psychophysics of cooperation: Nonverbal communication in a public goods game. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 25, 241–259.Google Scholar
  31. Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390–423.Google Scholar
  32. Lanzetta, J. T., & Englis, B. G. (1989). Expectations of cooperation and competition and their effects on observers' vicarious emotional responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 543–554.Google Scholar
  33. McArthur, L. A., & Baron, R. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90, 215–238.Google Scholar
  34. Oehman, A. (2002). Automaticity and the amygdala: Nonconscious responses to emotional faces. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 62–66.Google Scholar
  35. Orbell, J., & Dawes, R. (1993). Social welfare, cooperator's advantage, and the option of not playing the game. American Sociological Review, 58, 787–800.Google Scholar
  36. Petrinovich, L. (1979). Probabilistic functionalism: A conception of research method. American Psychologist, 34, 373–390.Google Scholar
  37. Rapoport, A., & Chammah, A. (1965). Prisoner's dilemma: A study in conflict and cooperation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  38. Riggio, R. E., & Friedman, H. S. (1986). Impression formation: The role of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 421–427.Google Scholar
  39. Sabatelli, R. M., & Rubin, M. (1986). Nonverbal expressiveness and physical attractiveness as mediators of interpersonal perceptions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 10, 120–133.Google Scholar
  40. Sally, D. (1995). Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis of experiments from 1958 to 1992. Rationality and Society, 7, 58–92.Google Scholar
  41. Sally, D. (2000). A general theory of sympathy, mind-reading, and social interaction, with an application to the Prisoners' Dilemma. Social Science Information, 39, 567–634.Google Scholar
  42. Sheehan, M. (2002). Heart and soul: Thinking modes and nonverbal sending and receiving ability. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62(8-A): 2620.Google Scholar
  43. Silk, J. B. (2001). Grunts, girneys, and good intentions: Origins of strategic commitments in nonhuman primates. In R. M. Hesse (Ed.), Evolution and the capacity for commitment (pp. 138–157). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Soukhanov, A. H. (Ed.). (1984). Webster's II new Riverside University Dictionary. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  45. Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection: A selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53, 205–214.Google Scholar
  46. Zahavi, A. (1977). The costs of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principal). Journal of Theoretical Biology, 67, 603–605.Google Scholar
  47. Zebrowitz, L. A., & Montepare, J. M. (1992). Impressions of babyfaced individuals across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 28, 1143–1152.Google Scholar
  48. Zebrowitz, L. A., Voinescu, L., & Collins, M. A. (1996). "Wide-eyed" and "crooked-faced": Determinants of perceived and real honesty across the life span. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1258–1269.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologySt. John's UniversityJamaica
  2. 2.Communications Sciences and PsychologyUniversity of ConnecticutStorrs

Personalised recommendations