Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Trait Anger and Negative Attitudes Towards Women on Physical Assault in Dating Relationships

  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study investigated the combined effect of trait anger and negative attitudes towards women (i.e., hostility towards women, calloused sexual beliefs) on frequency of physical aggression in premarital relationships. A total of 263 college-aged men who reported that they were either currently involved in a romantic relationship or had been involved in at least one romantic relationship during the past 12 months were recruited. Participants completed a battery of questionnaires, including the Conflict Tactics Scale-2, Trait Anger Scale, Hostility Towards Women Scale, and Hypermasculinity Inventory. Correlational analyses indicated that trait anger, hostility towards women, and calloused sexual beliefs were positively associated with frequency of physical assault. Further, hierarchical regression analyses indicated that both hostility towards women and calloused sexual beliefs moderated the relationship between trait anger and frequency of physical assault, such that in men who possess more negative attitudes towards women, higher levels of trait anger lead to increased physical assault. Results provide initial support for the role of trait anger in dating violence and suggest the existence of a subgroup among premaritally violent males who possess negative attitudes toward women and also possess a strong tendency to experience intense levels of anger.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken, L. S., and West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias, I., and O'Leary, K. D. (1988). Cognitive–behavioral treatment of physical aggression in marriage. In Epstein, N., Schlesinger, S. E., and Dryden, W. (Eds.), Cognitive–Behavioral Therapy With Families, Brunner/Mazel, New York, pp. 118–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias, I., Samios, M., and O'Leary, K. D. (1987). Prevalence and correlates of physical aggression during courtship. J. Interpers. Violence 2: 82–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, O. W., Fagan, R. W., and Booker, J. M. (1991). Hostility and stress as mediators of aggression in violent men. J. Fam. Violence 6: 217–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51: 1173–1182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasely, R., and Stoltenberg, C.D. (1992). Personality characteristics of male spouse abusers. Prof. Psychol. Res. Pract. 23: 310–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, L. (1993). Aggression: Its Causes, Consequences, and Control, McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookwala, J., Frieze, I. H., Smith, C., and Ryan, K. (1992). Predictors of dating violence: A multivariate analysis. Violence and Victims, 7, 297–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briere, J. (1987). Predicting self-reported likelihood of battering: Attitudes and childhood experiences. J. Res. Pers. 21: 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cate, R. M., Henton, J. M., Koval, J., Christopher, F. S., and Lloyd, S. (1982). Premarital abuse: A social psychological perspective J. Fam. Issues 3: 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Check, J. V. P. (1985). The Hostility Towards Women scale. Diss. Abstr. Int. 45–12 B: 3993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Check, J. V. P. (1988). Hostility towards women: Some theoretical considerations. In Russell, G. W. (ed.), Violence in Intimate Relationships, PMA Publishing, Costa Mesa, CA, pp. 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datlow, C. M. (1999). The effects of diazepam and hostility toward women on physical aggression in men. Diss. Abstr. Int. 60–1B: 363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deffenbacher, J. L., Oetting, E. R., Thwaites, G. A., Lynch, R. S., Baker, D. A., Stark, R. S., Thacker, S., and Eiswerth-Cox, L. (1996). State-Trait-Anger Theory and the Utility of the Trait-Anger Scale. J. Couns. Psychol. 43: 131–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey, G., Feldman, S., and Ayduk, O. (2000). Rejection sensitivity and male violence in romantic relationships. Pers. Rel. 7: 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt, C. I., Barbour, K. A., and Stuart, G. L. (1997). Anger and hostility in maritally violent men: Conceptual distinctions, measurement issues, and literature review. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 17: 333–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foo, L., and Margolin, G. (1995). A multivariate investigation of dating aggression. J. Fam. Violence 10: 351–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gortner, E. T., Gollan, J. K., and Jacobson, N. S. (1997). Psychological aspects of perpetrators of domestic violence and their relationships with the victims. Psychiatr. Clin. North Am. 20: 337–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Bates, L., Smutzler, N., and Sandin, E. (1997). A brief review of the research on husband violence. Part I: Maritally violent versus nonviolent men. Aggr. Viol. Behav. 2: 65–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laner, M. R., and Thompson, J. (1982). Abuse and aggression in courting couples. Dev. Behav. 3: 229–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, K. E., and Blane, H. T. (1992). Alcohol and marital aggression in a national sample of young men. J. Interpers. Violence 7: 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, K. E., and Senchak, M. (1993). Alcohol and premarital aggression among newlywed couples. J. Stud. Alcohol 11: 96–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, K. E., and Senchak, M. (1996). Prospective prediction of husband marital aggression within newlywed couples. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 105: 369–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamuth, N. M. (1986). Predictors of naturalistic sexual aggression. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50: 953–962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamuth, N. M. (1988). Predicting laboratory aggression against female and male targets: Implications for sexual aggression. J. Res. Pers. 22: 474–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamuth, N. M., Sockloskie, R. J., Koss, M. P., and Tanaka, J. S. (1991). Characteristics of aggressors against women: Testing a model using a national sample of college students. J. Clin. Couns. Psychol. 59: 670–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolin, G., John, R. S., and Gleberman, L. (1988). Affective responses to conflictual discussions in violent and nonviolent couples. J. Cons. Clin. Psychol. 56: 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, D. L., and Sirkin, M. (1984). Measuring a macho personality constellation. J. Res. Pers. 18: 150–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C. M., and O'Leary, K.D. (1989). Psychological aggression predicts physical aggression in early marriage. J. Couns. Clin. Psychol. 57: 579–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrott, D. J., Zeichner, A., Evces, M., Mattingly, M., and Stephens, D. (2000). Effects of trait-anger on laboratory aggression. Presented at the 34th Annual Meeting for the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, New Orleans.

  • Riggs, D. S., and O'Leary, K. D. (1989). A theoretical model of courtship aggression. In Pirog-Good, M. A., and Stets, J. E. (Eds.), Violence in Dating Relationships: Emerging Social Issues, Praeger Publishers, New York, pp. 53–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, D. S., and O'Leary, K. D. (1996). Aggression between heterosexual dating partners: An examination of a causal model of courtship aggression. J. Interpers. Violence 11: 519–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, A. (1986). Of men, macho, and marital violence. J. Fam. Violence 1: 121–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. (1990). Patriarchal ideology and wife beating: A test of a feminist hypothesis. Violence Vict. 5: 257–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D. (1988). Professional Manual for the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI), Research edn., Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Jacobs, G., Russell, S., and Crane, R. (1983). Assessment of anger: The State-Trait-Anger Scale. In Butcher, J. N., and Spielberger, C. D. (Eds.), Advances in Personality Assessment, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, Vol. 3, pp. 112–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (1986). Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys. J. Marr. Fam. 48: 465–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Bony-McCoy, S., and Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Develop-ment and preliminary psychometric data. J. Fam. Issues 17: 283–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugarman, D. B., and Hotaling, G. T. (1989). Dating violence: Prevalence, context, and risk markers. In Pirog-Good, M. A., and Stets, J. E. (Eds.), Violence in Dating Relationships: Emerging Social Issues, Praeger Publishers, New York, pp. 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. W., and Koss, M. P. (1991). Courtship violence: Incidence in a national sample of higher education students. Violence Vict. 6: 247–256.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amos Zeichner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parrott, D.J., Zeichner, A. Effects of Trait Anger and Negative Attitudes Towards Women on Physical Assault in Dating Relationships. Journal of Family Violence 18, 301–307 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025169328498

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025169328498

Navigation