Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial error propagation when computing linear combinations of spectral bands: The case of vegetation indices

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The collection of accurate and timely information on land use, crops, forest and vegetation are increasingly based on remote sensing spectral measurements produced by satellites. The most recent spacecrafts like the Earth Observing 1 (EO-1) produce a rich source of information being endowed with hyperspectral sensors that can provide up to 200 or more channels. In many instances such a multivariate signal has to be reduced to just one single value per pixel representing a particular characteristic of land. Linear combinations of bands are the general form of many indices. Since each individual image used to construct indices contains errors, when combined they produce a propagation of errors, a process that can distort a final output map. In this paper we measure the extent of error propagation when building linear vegetation indices. We consider three types of indices: the difference vegetation index (DVI), selected Kauth-Thomas indices (SBI, GVI and WET), and principal components, using benchmarking examples taken from the remote sensing literature. The main implication emerging from these examples is that the SBI and the first principal component are the indices more prone to error propagation. The formalization presented here allows a user to derive measures of error propagation in cases where technical characteristics of a sensor and physical characteristics of a landscape are known. These results can help a user to choose between alternative vegetation indices, and to associate a measure of reliability with such indices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arbia, G., Griffith, D., and Haining, R. (1998) Error propagation modeling in raster GIS: overlay operations. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12, 145–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbia, G., Griffith, D., and Haining, R. (1999) Error propagation modeling in raster GIS: addition and ratioing operations. Cartography & Geographical Information Science, 26, 297–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashburn, P. (1978) The vegetative index number and crop identification. Proceedings, Technical session, LACIE Symposium, Houston, Tex., National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 843–56.

  • Bauer, M.E., Burk, A.R., EK A.R., Coppin, P.R., Lime, S.D., Walsch, T.A., Walters, D.K., Befort, W., and Heinzen D.F. (1994) Satellite inventory of Minnesota Forest resources. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 60(3), 287–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J.B. (1996) Introduction to remote sensing, 2nd edition, The Guilford Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N. (1991) Statistics for spatial data, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crist, E.P. and Cicone, R.C. (1984) Application of the tasseled cap concept to simulated thematic mapper data. Photogrammetric engineering and Remote sensing, 50, 343–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, B.C. (1980) Urban residential ground cover using Landsat digital data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 46, 1725–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geman, S. and Geman, D. (1984) Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Transactions in Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6, 721–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geman, D. and Reynolds, G. (1992) Constrained restoration and the recovery of discontinuities. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 14(3), 367–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M.S. Guoging, and Y. Shiren. (1992) Development and test of an error made for categorical data. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 6, 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutman, G. (1987) The derivation of vegetation indices for AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 8, 715–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haining, R.P. and Arbia, G. (1993) Error propagation through map operations. Technometrics, 35, 293–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, B.R. (1977) Bayesian methods in non linear digital image restoration. IEEE Transaction in Computing, C-23, 219–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J.R. (1986) Introductory digital image processing, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauth, R.J. and Thomas, G.S. (1976) The tasseled cap: a graphic description of the spectral-temporal development of agricultural crops as seen by Landsat. Proceedings of LARS 1976, Symp. on Machine Processing of Remote Sensed Data. Purdue University.

  • Kauth, R.J., Lambeck, P.F., Richardson, W., Thomas, G.S., and Pentland, A.P. (1979) Feature extraction applied to agricultural crops as seen by Landsat. Proceedings, Technical session, LACIE Symposium, Houston, Tex.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 705–21.

  • Kidwell, K.B. (1990) (editor), Global Vegetation Index user's guide, Washington, D.C., NOAA/NESDIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landsat (2000) http://eol.gsfc.nasa.gov/technology/documents/instrumentoverview.html.

  • Medler, M.J. (1999) Modeling potential forest fire patterns in Northern New Mexico. Proceedings of the Joint Fire Science Conference and Workshop, Boise Idaho, June, 49–50.

  • Patterson, M.W. and Tool, S.R. (1998) Mapping fire-induced vegetation mortality using Landsat Thematic Mapper data: A comparison of linear transformation techniques. Remote Sensing of Environment, 65, 132–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J.A. (1986) Remote sensing digital image analysis, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, A.J. and Wiegand, C.L. (1977) Distinguishing vegetation from soil background information. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 43, 1541–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, B. (1988) Statistical inference for spatial processes, Cambridge University Press.

  • Rosenfeld, A. and Kak, A.C. (1982) Digital Picture processing, Academic Press, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, J.W., Hass, R.H., Schell, J.A., and Deering, D.W. (1973) Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plans with ERTS. Proceedings of the third ERTS Symposium, 1, 48–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shippert, P. (2002) Spotlight on hyperspectral. Geospatial Solutions, 12(2), 40–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, N.M. (1999) Remote sensing tutorial, NASA pub. http://rst.gsfc.nasa.gov/Front/tofc.html

  • Thompson, D.R. and Whemanens, O.A. (1980) Using Landsat digital data to detect moisture stress in corn-soybean growing regions. Photogrammetric engineering and Remote sensing, 46, 1082–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, C.J. (1979) Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote sensing of environment, 8, 127–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, R., Jordan, T.R., and Ehlers, M. (1985) Comparative evaluations of the geodetic accuracy and cartographic potential of Landsat-4 and Landsat-5 thematic mapper image data. Photogrammetric engineering and remote sensing, 51, 1799–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, S.G. and Misra, P.N. (1976) Linear dimensionality of Landsat agricultural data with implications for classification. Proceedings, symposium on Machine Processing of Remotely Sensed Data, West Lafayette IN, Laboratory for the Application of Remote Sensing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegand, C.L., Gausmann, H.W., Cuellar, J.A., Guberman, A.H., and Richardson, A.J. (1974) Vegetation density as deduced from ERTS-1 MSS response, Proceedings Third ERTS-1 Symposium, Vol. 1.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arbia, G., Griffith, D.A. & Haining, R.P. Spatial error propagation when computing linear combinations of spectral bands: The case of vegetation indices. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 10, 375–396 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025167225797

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025167225797

Navigation