Skip to main content
Log in

Likelihood Based Confidence Intervals for the Tail Index

  • Published:
Extremes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For the estimation of the tail index of a heavy tailed distribution, one of the well-known estimators is the Hill estimator (Hill, 1975). One obvious way to construct a confidence interval for the tail index is via the normal approximation of the Hill estimator. In this paper we apply both the empirical likelihood method and the parametric likelihood method to obtaining confidence intervals for the tail index. Our limited simulation study indicates that the normal approximation method is worse than the other two methods in terms of coverage probability, and the empirical likelihood method and the parametric likelihood method are comparable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beirlant, J., Dierckx, G., Goegebeur, Y., and Matthys, G., “Tail index estimation and an exponential regression model,” Extremes 2(2), 177–200, (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beirlant, J., Teugels, J.L., and Vynckier, P., “Tail index estimation, Pareto quantile plots, and regression diagnostics,” J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 91, 1695–1667, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng, S. and Peng, L., “Confidence intervals for the tail index,” Bernoulli 7(5), 751–760, (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Csörgő, S., Deheuvels, P., and Mason, D., “Kernel estimates of the tail index of a distribution,” Ann. Statist. 13, 1050–1077, (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Csörgő, S. and Viharos, L., “Asymptotic normality of least-squares estimators of tail indices,” Bernoulli 3(3), 351–370, (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Danielsson, J., de Haan, L., Peng, L., and de Vries, C., “Using a bootstrap method to choose the sample fraction in tail index estimation,” Journal of Multivariate Analysis 76, 226–248, (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Danielsson, J., Hartmann, P., and de Vries, C., The cost of conservatism. RISK 11(1), 101–103, (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Danielsson, J. and de Vries, C., “Tail index and quantile estimation with very high frequency data,” Journal of Empirical Finance 4, 241–257, (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dekkers, A.L.M., Einmahl, J.H.J., and de Haan, L., “A moment estimator for the index of an extreme-value distribution,” Ann. Statist. 17, 1833–1855, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  10. DiCiccio, T.J., Hall, P., and Romano, J.P., “Empirical likelihood is Bartlett correctable,” Ann. Statist. 19, 1053–1061, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Drees, H., “Refined Pickands estimators of the extreme value index,” Ann. Statist. 23, 2059–2080, (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Embrechts, P., Resnick, S., and Samorodnitsky, G., “Living on the Edge,” RISK 11(1), 96–100, (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Embrechts, P., Resnick, S., and Samorodnitsky, G., “Extreme value theory as a risk management tool,” North American Actuarial Journal 3, 30–41, (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Feuerverger, A. and Hall, P., “Estimating a tail exponent by modeling departure from a Pareto distribution,” Ann. Statist. 27, 760–781, (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guillou, A. and Hall, P., “A diagnostic for selecting the threshold in extreme-value analysis,” J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B. 63(2), 293–305, (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  16. De Haan, L. and Peng, L., “Comparison of tail index estimators,” Statistica Neerlandica 52(1), 60–70, (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hall, P., “On some simple estimators of an exponent of regular variation,” J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 44, 37–42, (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hall, P. and La Scala, B., “Methodology and algorithms of empirical likelihood,” Internal. Statist. Rev. 58, 109–127, (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hall, P. and Weissman, I., “On the estimation of extreme tail probabilities,” Ann. Statist. 25(3), 1311–1326, (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hill, B.M., “A simple general approach to inference about the tail of a distribution,” Ann. Statist. 3, 1163–1174, (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mason, D., “Laws of large numbers for sums extreme values,” Ann. Probab. 10, 754–764, (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  22. McNeil, A.J., “Estimating the tails of loss severity distributions using extreme value theory,” ASTIN Bulletin 27, 117–137, (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Owen, A.B., “Empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for a single functional,” Biometrika 75(2), 237–249, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Owen, A.B., “Empirical likelihood ratio confidence regions,” Ann. Statist. 18, 90–120, (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Resnick, S.I., Discussion of the Danish data on large fire insurance losses. Preprint (1996).

  26. Pickands III, J., “Statistical inference using extreme order statistics,” Ann. Statist. 3, 119–131, (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Weissman, I., “Estimation of parameters and large quantiles based on the k largest observations,” J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 73, 812–815, (1978).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lu, JC., Peng, L. Likelihood Based Confidence Intervals for the Tail Index. Extremes 5, 337–352 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025163807024

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025163807024

Navigation