Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Predicting length of stay out of hospital following lung resection using preoperative health status measures

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies evaluating predictors of operative outcome for lung resection have focused on physiological measures of cardiorespiratory impairment, but these have proved inadequate. This study evaluated the predictive abilities of six preoperative variables: the global quality of life (QL), social function (SF), and emotional function (EF) scales of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer's (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire, 6-min walk distance (6MWD), forced expiratory volume (FEV1), and diffusion capacity (DLco). Operative outcome was represented by the surrogate measure length of stay out of hospital within the first 30 days (LOSOH). A single-centre prospective cohort study evaluating 70 subjects was conducted using multiple regression. LOSOH was bimodally distributed, therefore analysis was undertaken for the entire sample and for two separate groups (A and B). Group B (n = 4) experienced severe complications (LOSOH = 0–5 days) and was too small for statistical analysis. Group A (n = 66) suffered fewer and less severe complications (LOSOH = 14–26 days). For the entire sample, age was the sole predictor of LOSOH (R 2 = 0.123, p = 0.003). In Group A, the strongest predictors of LOSOH were global QL score and 6MWD (R 2 = 0.224, p < 0.001). LOSOH was inversely correlated with complications. While it remains difficult to predict severe complications in this population, within Group A, health status measures demonstrated a limited ability to predict LOSOH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rusch VW. Pulmonary metastasectomy: Current indications. Chest 1995; 107: 322S–332S.

    Google Scholar 

  2. O'Byrne C. Postoperative care and complications in the thoracotomy patient. Crit Care Quart 1985; 3: 53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ginsberg RJ, et al. Modern thirty-day operative mortality for surgical resections in lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiov Sur 1983; 86: 654–658.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Faber LP, et al. Results of sleeve lobectomy for bronchogenic carcinoma in 101 patients. Ann Thorac Sur 1984; 37: 279–285.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wiren JE, Janzon L. Respiratory complications following surgery. Improved prediction with preoperative spirometry. Acta Anaesth Scand 1983; 27: 476–479.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Epstein SK, et al. Predicting complications after pulmonary resection. Chest 1993; 104: 694–700.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nagasaki F, et al. Complications of surgery in treatment of carcinoma of the lung. Chest 1982; 82: 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kearney DJ, et al. Assessment of operative risk in patients undergoing lung resection: Importance of predicted pulmonary function. Chest 1994; 105: 753–759.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Busch E, et al. Pulmonary complications in patients undergoing thoracotomy for lung carcinoma. Chest 1994; 105: 760–766.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Deslauriers J, et al. Prospective assessment of 30-day operative morbidity for surgical resections in lung cancer. Chest 1994; 106: 329S–330S.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smith TP, et al. Exercise capacity as a predictor of post-thoracotomy morbidity. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984; 129: 730–734.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Garibaldi RA, et al. Risk factors for postoperative pneumonia. Am J Med 1981; 70: 677–680.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Markos J, et al. Preoperative assessment as a predictor of mortality and morbidity after lung resection. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989; 139: 902–910.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gerson MC, et al. Prediction of cardiac and pulmonary complications related to elective abdominal and non-cardiac thoracic surgery in geriatric patients. Am J Med 1990; 88: 101–107.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Forshag MS, Cooper AD. Postoperative care of the thoracotomy patient. Clin Chest Med 1992; 13: 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cottrell JJ, Ferson PF. Preoperative assessment of the thoracic surgical patient. Clin Chest Med 1992; 13: 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marshall MC, Olsen GN. The physiologic evaluation of the lung resection candidate. Clin Chest Med 1993; 14: 305–320.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Olsen GN, et al. Stair climbing as an exercise test to predict postoperative complications of lung resection. Chest 1991; 99: 587–590.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Boysen PG. Perioperative management of the thoracotomy patient. Clin Chest Med 1993; 14: 321–333.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gilbreth EM, Weisman ID. Role of exercise stress testing in preoperative evaluation of patients for lung resection. Clin Chest Med 1994; 15: 389–403.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Merli GJ, Weitz HH. Approaching the surgical patient. Clin Chest Med 1993; 14: 205–210.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zibrak JD, O'Donnell CR. Indications for preoperative pulmonary function testing. Clin Chest Med 1993; 14: 227–236.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Amar D, et al. Clinical and echocardiographic correlates of symptomatic tachydysrhythmias after noncardiac thoracic surgery. Chest 1995; 108: 349–354.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vance V, et al. Prospective analysis of operability of resectable lung cancer. Lung Cancer Res 1991; Sl 176.

  25. Cykert S. Lung cancer surgery: Postoperative complications. Chest 1994; 106: 1930–1931.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Morice RC, et al. Exercise testing in the evaluation of patients at high risk for complications from lung resection. Chest 1992; 101: 356–361.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wernly JA, DeMeester TR. Preoperative assessment of patients undergoing lung resection for cancer. In: Roth JA, et al. (eds), Thoracic Oncology Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, 1989: 156–176.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bergman B, et al. The EORTC QLQ-LC13: A modular supplement to the EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30) for use in lung cancer clinical trial. Eur J Cancer 1994; 30A: 635–642.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Aaronson NK, et al. The European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Nat Cancer Inst 1993; 85: 365–376.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Aaronson NK, et al. The European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) modular approach to quality of life assessment in oncology: An update. Int J Ment Health 1994; 23: 75–96.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fayers P, et al. EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. Brussels: EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Patrick DL, Erickson P. Health Status and Health Policy: Quality of Life in Health Care Evaluation and Resource Allocation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Holden DA, et al. Exercise testing, 6-minute walk, and stair climb in the evaluation of patients at high risk for pulmonary resection. Chest 1992; 102: 1774–1779.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kohman LJ, et al. Random versus predictable risks of mortality after thoracotomy for lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiov Sur 1986; 91: 551–554.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bolliger CT, et al. Lung scanning and exercise testing for the prediction of postoperative performance in lung resection candidates at increased risk for complications. Chest 1995; 108: 341–348.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Reilly JJ. Benefits of aggressive perioperative management in patients undergoing thoractomy. Chest 1995; 107: 312S–315S.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rao V, et al. Exercise oximetry versus spirometry in the assessment of risk prior to lung resection. Ann Thorac Sur 1995; 60: 603–609.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Aaronson NK, et al. Multidimensional approach to the measurement of quality of life in lung cancer clinical trials. In: Aaronson NK, Beckmann J (eds), The Quality of Life of Cancer Patients, New York: Raven Press, 1987: 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Maguire P, Selby P. Assessing quality of life in cancer patients. Brit J Cancer 1989; 60: 437–440.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to their Development and Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Guyatt GH, et al. The 6-minute walk: A new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. Can Med Assoc J 1985; 132: 919–923.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Butland RJA, et al. Two-, six-, and 12-minute walking tests in respiratory disease. Brit Med J 1982; 284: 1607–1608.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Guyatt GH, et al. Measuring functional status in chronic lung disease: Conclusions from a randomized control trial. Respir Med 1989; 83: 293–297.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Guyatt GH, et al. Effect of encouragement on walking test performance. Thorax 1984; 39: 818–822.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lipkin DP, et al. Six minute walking test for assessing exercise capacity in chronic heart failure. Brit Med J 1986; 292: 653–655.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Borg GAV. Psychological bases of physical exertion. Med Sci Sport Exer 1982; 14: 377–381.

    Google Scholar 

  47. American Thoracic Society. Lung function testing: Selection of reference values and interpretative strategies. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991; 144: 1202–1218.

    Google Scholar 

  48. American Thoracic Society. Standardization of spirometry: 1987 update. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987; 136: 1285–1298.

    Google Scholar 

  49. American Thoracic Society. Single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (transfer factor): Recommendations for a standard technique. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987; 136: 1299–1307.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Norman G, Streiner D. Biostatistics: The Bare Essentials. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Books, Inc., 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL. Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods. N. Scituate, Mass: Duxbury Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Pagano M, Gauvreau K. Principles of Biostatistics. Belmont, Calif.: Duxbury Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hamilton LC. Regression with Graphics. Belmont, Calif.: Duxbury Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Graybill FA, Iyer HK. Regression Analysis: Concepts and Applications. Belmont, Calif.: Duxbury Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Norusis MJ/SPSS Inc. SPSS 6.1 Base System User's Guide (II). SPSS, Inc., 1994.

  56. Jaeschke R, et al. Basic Statistics for Clinicians (III); Assessing the effects of treatment: Measures of Association. Can Med Assoc J 1994; 150: 1575–1579.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wilkinson L, et al. SYSTAT: Statistics Manual. SYSTAT for Macintosh, Version 5.2 Evanston, Ill.: SYSTAT Inc., 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Haut MW, et al. Postchemotherapy nausea and vomiting in cancer patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy. J Psychosoc Oncol 1991; 9: 117–130.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Research, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Canada

    Janet A. Parsons

  2. Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Canada

    Janet A. Parsons

  3. Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Health Network (Princess Margaret Hospital), Canada

    Michael R. Johnston

  4. Departments of Surgery and Institute of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Canada

    Michael R. Johnston

  5. St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Michael R. Johnston

  6. Departments of Medicine and Institute of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Arthur S. Slutsky

Authors
  1. Janet A. Parsons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael R. Johnston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Arthur S. Slutsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parsons, J.A., Johnston, M.R. & Slutsky, A.S. Predicting length of stay out of hospital following lung resection using preoperative health status measures. Qual Life Res 12, 645–654 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025147906867

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025147906867

Search

Navigation