Abstract
The conventional wisdom in public opinion research suggests that the white public views government spending as a single race-coded issue. This article develops an alternative theory that rests on two propositions. First, the white public sees government spending not as a single issue, but rather, as two distinct issues: spending on the deserving poor and spending on the undeserving poor. Second, political sophistication strengthens the impact racial stereotypes have on attitudes toward spending on the undeserving poor, and it does not affect the relationship between stereotypes and attitudes toward spending on the deserving poor. These hypotheses are tested using data from the 1996 and 1992 NES surveys. The empirical results provide strong support for both propositions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bollen, Kenneth A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: John Wiley.
Carmines, Edward G., and Stimson, James A. (1980). The two faces of issue voting. American Political Science Review 74: 78–91.
Chong, Dennis (1996). Creating common frames of reference on political issues. In Diana C. Mutz, Paul M. Sniderman, and Richard A. Brody (eds.), Political Persuasion and Attitude Change, pp. 195–224. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Clawson, Rosalee A., and Trice, Rakuya (2000). Poverty as we know it. Public Opinion Quarterly 64: 53–64.
Converse, Philip E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In David Apter (ed.), Ideology and Discontent, pp. 206–261. New York: Free Press.
Cook, Fay Lomax, and Barrett, Edith J. (1992). Support for the American Welfare State: The Views of Congress and the Public. New York: Columbia University Press.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott (1996). What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Devine, Patricia G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56: 5–18.
Druckman, James N. (2001a). On the limits of framing effects: who can frame?
Journal of Politics 63: 1041–1066.
Druckman, James N. (2001b). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior 23: 225–256.
Federico, Christopher M. (2002). When do welfare attitudes become racialized? The paradoxical effects of education and political sophistication. Unpublished paper, University of Minnesota.
Feldman, Stanley, and Steenbergen, Marco R. (2001a). The humanitarian foundation of public support for social welfare. American Journal of Political Science 45: 658–677.
Feldman, Stanley, and Steenbergen, Marco R. (2001b). Social welfare attitudes and the humanitarian sensibility. In James H. Kuklinski (ed.), Citizens and Politics: Perspectives from Political Psychology, pp. 366–400. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Feldman, Stanley, and Zaller, John (1992). The political culture of ambivalence: ideological responses to the welfare state. American Journal of Political Science 36: 268–307.
Gilens, Martin (1995). Racial attitudes and opposition to welfare. Journal of Politics 57: 994–1014.
Gilens, Martin (1996a). “Race coding” and white opposition to welfare. American Political Science Review 90: 593–604.
Gilens, Martin (1996b). Race and poverty in America: public misperceptions and the American news media. Public Opinion Quarterly 60: 515–41.
Gilens, Martin (1999). Why Americans Hate Welfare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goren, Paul (2000). Political expertise and principled political thought. Political Research Quarterly 53: 117–136.
Iyengar, Shanto (1990). Framing responsibility for political issues: the case of poverty. Political Behavior 12: 19–40.
Jacoby, William J. (1994). Public attitudes toward government spending. American Journal of Political Science 38: 336–361.
Jacoby, William J. (2000). Issue framing and public opinion on government spending. American Journal of Political Science 44: 750–767.
Kinder, Donald R., and Mendelberg, Tali (2000). Individualism reconsidered. In David O. Sears, Jim Sidanius, and Lawrence Bobo (eds.), The Debate About Racism in America, pp. 44–76. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kinder, Donald R., and Sanders, Lynn M. (1996). Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
King, Gary (1989). Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Luskin, Robert C. (1987). Measuring political sophistication. American Journal of Political Science 31: 856–899.
McClosky, Herbert, and Zaller, John (1984). The American Ethos. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mendelberg, Tali (1997). Executing Hortons: racial crime in the 1988 presidential campaign. Public Opinion Quarterly 61: 134–157.
Mendelberg, Tali (2001). The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Nelson, Thomas E., Clawson, Rosalee A., and Oxley, Zoe. M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review 91: 567–583.
Nelson, Thomas E., and Kinder, Donald R. (1996). Issue frames and group-centrism in American public opinion. Journal of Politics 58: 1055–1078.
Nelson, Thomas E., Oxley, Zoe M., and Clawson, Rosalee A. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior 19: 221–246.
Patterson, James T. (1994). America's Struggle Against Poverty, 1900–1994. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rasinski, Kenneth A. (1989). The effect of question wording on public support for government spending. Public Opinion Quarterly 53: 388–94.
Smith, Tom W. (1987). That which we call welfare by any other name would smell sweeter: an analysis of the impact of question wording on response patterns. Public Opinion Quarterly 51: 75–83.
Sniderman, Paul M. (2000). Taking sides: a fixed choice theory of political reasoning. In Arthur Lupia, Matthew D. McCubbins, and Samuel L. Popkin (eds.), Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality, pp. 67–84. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sniderman, Paul M., Brody, Richard A., and Tetlock, Philip E. (1991). Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zaller, John R. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goren, P. Race, Sophistication, and White Opinion on Government Spending. Political Behavior 25, 201–220 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025121406460
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025121406460