Skip to main content
Log in

Survey methods for assessing land cover map accuracy

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increasing availability of digital photographic materials has fueled efforts by agencies and organizations to generate land cover maps for states, regions, and the United States as a whole. Regardless of the information sources and classification methods used, land cover maps are subject to numerous sources of error. In order to understand the quality of the information contained in these maps, it is desirable to generate statistically valid estimates of accuracy rates describing misclassification errors. We explored a full sample survey framework for creating accuracy assessment study designs that balance statistical and operational considerations in relation to study objectives for a regional assessment of GAP land cover maps. We focused not only on appropriate sample designs and estimation approaches, but on aspects of the data collection process, such as gaining cooperation of land owners and using pixel clusters as an observation unit. The approach was tested in a pilot study to assess the accuracy of Iowa GAP land cover maps. A stratified two-stage cluster sampling design addressed sample size requirements for land covers and the need for geographic spread while minimizing operational effort. Recruitment methods used for private land owners yielded high response rates, minimizing a source of nonresponse error. Collecting data for a 9-pixel cluster centered on the sampled pixel was simple to implement, and provided better information on rarer vegetation classes as well as substantial gains in precision relative to observing data at a single-pixel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cochran, W.G. (1977) Sampling techniques, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congalton, R.G. (1988) A comparison of sampling schemes used in generating error matrices for assessing the accuracy of maps generated from remotely sensed data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 54(5), 593–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congalton, R. (1991) A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37, 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congalton, R. and Green, K. (1993) A practical look at the sources of confusion in error matrix generation. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 59(5), 641–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crist, P. and Deitner, R. (1998) Assessing land cover map accuracy. National GAP Analysis Handbook. USGS/BRD, Idaho Coop. Fish and Wildlife Unit, Univ. of Idaho, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, R.M. (1989) Survey errors and survey costs, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, M.D. (2000) Gap analysis: concepts, methods, and recent results. Landscape Ecology, 15, 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessler, J.T. and Kalsbeek, W.D. (1992) Nonsampling errors in surveys, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohr, S.L. (1999) Sampling: design and analysis, Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove, CA, p. 494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nusser, S.M. and Klaas, E.E. (2002) Final performance report to EPA Region 7, Part II: Gap accuracy assessment pilot study. Environmental Protection Agency Contract X997387–01 Final Report. Iowa Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salant, P. and Dillman, D.A. (1994) How to conduct your own survey, Wiley, New York, NY, p. 232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Särndal, C.-E., Swensson, B., and Wretman, J. (1992) Model assisted survey sampling, Springer-Verlag, New York, p. 694.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS (2000) SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 8, SAS, Inc., Cary, NC, p. 3749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehman, S.V. (1997) Selecting and interpreting measures of thematic classification accuracy. Remote Sensing of Environment, 62, 77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehman, S.V. (1999) Basic probability sampling designs for thematic map accuracy assessment. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20, 2347–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehman, S.V. and Czaplewski, R.L. (1998) Design and analysis for thematic map accuracy assessment: Fundamental principles. Remote Sensing of Environment, 64(3), 331–44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nusser, S.M., Klaas, E.E. Survey methods for assessing land cover map accuracy. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 10, 309–331 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025107023980

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025107023980

Navigation