Skip to main content
Log in

America's First Medical Malpractice Crisis, 1835–1865

  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prior to the early 1800's, medical malpractice was almost unknown in the United States. However, a large number of malpractice law suits inundated the courts between 1835 and 1865. About 70 to 90 percent of the litigation involved fractures and dislocations with imperfect results or deformities such as shortened or crooked limbs. Lawyers alleged that the physicians did not provide due proper care, skill and diligence despite the fact that the better surgeons tried to save limbs rather than follow the common practice of amputation, especially for compound fractures. While a number of texts dealt with medical jurisprudence, it was not until 1860 that a text on the subject intensively delved into the issue of medical malpractice. Coincidentally, the attitudes and behaviors of patients, lawyers, physicians and judges during the first medical malpractice crisis were surprisingly similar to those currently held.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Mohr JC. Doctors and the Law. Medical Jurisprudence in Nineteenth Century America. NY: Oxford University Press, 1993, pp. 113–114, 225.

    Google Scholar 

  2. DeVille KA. Medical Malpractice in Nineteenth-Century America. Origins and Legacy. NY: New York University Press, 1990, pp. 4, 25, 44, 225.

    Google Scholar 

  3. West J Med Physical Sci. Reviews 1853; 28:309.

  4. Elwell JJ. A Medico-Legal Treatise on Malpractice, Medical Evidence, and Insanity, Comprising the Elements of Medical Jurisprudence. NY: John S. Voorhis, 1860, pp. i, 55, 83; Shastid TH. A short biography of Dr. John J. Elwell. Amern Med 1909; 4(2): 94–96; According to Oates SB: A Woman of Valor. Clara Barton and the Civil War. NY: Free Press, 1994, pp. 148–154, in 1863, then Col. Elwell engaged in an adulterous affair with Clara Barton during the Civil War.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burns CR. Malpractice suits in American medicine before the Civil War. Bull Hist Med 1969; 43:41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Smith HW. Malpractice: Something of the anatomy of the law. JAMA 1941; 116(19):2149–2159.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chapman CB. Stratton vs. Swanlond: The fourteenth-century ancestor of the law of malpractice. The Pharos 1982; 45 (Fall):20-24; (legal citation) Year Book 48th Edward III, Hilary Term, folio 6, plea ii (1374); In other references, the surgeon has a whimsical pseudonym, 'J. Mort," and the plaintiff's gender is "male."; However, the date and facts are the same otherwise.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sandor AA. The history of professional liability suits in the United States. JAMA 1957; 163: 459–466.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chapman CB. Doctors and their autonomy: Past events and future prospects. Science 1978; 200: 851–856.

    Google Scholar 

  10. DeBance, Mich., 12 Henry IV, m. 615, Yorks Arch. Soc. Rec., XVII, p. 78 (1433); Sel. Cases in Chancery, S.S., p. 123, Case 128 (1435); Year Book Michelmas, II Edward IV, folio 6, plea 10 (1472).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Norman J. Morton's Medical Biography. Brookfield, VT: Gower Pub. Co., 1991, pp. 66, 267, 683–686.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Blackstone W. Of wrongs and their remedies, respecting the rights of persons, in private wrongs in Commentaries on the Laws of England (St. George Tucker's ed.) Phila: William Birch Young and Abraham, 1803, pp. 122–123; (later edition) NY: W.E. Dean, 1841.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith HW. Legal responsibility for medical malpractice. Forgotten ancestors of the American law of medical malpractice. JAMA 1941; 116: 2490–2494.; (Grovenvelt citation) 1 Lord Raymond 213, 1697.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lincoln Legal Briefs. Lincoln, medical law, and chicken bones. 1989; 1(12):1–4; Frey EF. Medicolegal history: A review of significant publications and educational developments. Law, Med & Hlth Care 1982; 10(4): 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Farr S. Elements of Medical Jurisprudence. London: T. Becket, 1788.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Beck TR. Elements of Medical Jurisprudence. Albany, NY: Webster & Skinner, 1823.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chitty J. A Practical Treatise on Medical Jurisprudence. London: Butterworth, 1834.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Taylor AS. Elements of Medical Jurisprudence. London: Deacon, 1836.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ray I. A Treatise on the medical Jurisprudence of Insanity. Boston: William D. Tichnor & Co., 1838.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dean A. Principles of Medical Jurisprudence. Designed for the professionals of Law & Medicine. NY: Gould, Banks and Gould, 1850.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wharton F & Stilé M. A Treatise on Medical Jurisprudence. Phila: Kay, 1855.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Webster J. Medical Jurisprudence. M.D. thesis submitted April 8, 1824. (In Miscellaneous Theses, College of Physicians of Philadelphia, Vol. 1).

  23. Webster J. Introductory to the Course on Anatomy, in Geneva Medical College, March 7, 1850. Geneva: Volenburgh, 1850, pp. 6, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  24. New York Medical Press. Notice of Elwell's Malpractice. 1860; 3:141–142.

  25. Root J. Reports of Cases Adjudged in the Superior Court and in the Supreme Court of Errors in the State of Connecticut, 1793 to 1798. n.p., 1802, Vol. 2, pp. 90–92.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gordon VM. The origin, basis and nature of medical malpractice liability. Conn Med 1970; 35: 73–77.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dawson J. Suit for damages in a case of fracture of the leg, followed by mortification and amputation. Ohio Med Surg J 1862; 14:283–288.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wood WM. Thoughts on suits for malpractice, suggested by judicial proceedings in Erie County, Pennsylvania. Am J Med Sci 1849; 18:395–400.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Boston Med Surg J. Prosecuring surgeons. 1852; 46:264–265.

  30. Hamilton FH. Prosecution for alleged (sic) mal-practice. Buf Med J Med Reports. 1848–1849; 4:275.

    Google Scholar 

  31. The Greenpoint malpractice case. Scalpel 1856; 8:311–315.

  32. Foster WL. Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Superior Court of Judicature of New Hampshire. Concord: G. Parker Lyon, 1857, Vol. 11, pp. 119–138.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Harris GW. Pennsylvania State Reports. Phila: Kay, 1855, Vol. 22, pp. 261–274.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Eliason EL. A saga of fracture therapy. Trans & Studies College Physicians of Phil 1943; 11:65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Guidi G (Vidus). Chirugia e graeco in latinum conversa. Paris, Petrus Galterius, 1544.

  36. Hippocrates. On Fractures. 400 B.C., Francis Adams, translator. http://classics.mit.edu/Hippocrates/fractur.mb.txt.html.

  37. Mulvania RL & Johanson JE. History of the treatment of compound fractures. Minn Med 1971; 54(10):853–860.

    Google Scholar 

  38. De Moulin D. The treatment of compound fractures in the eighteenth century. Netherlands J Surg 1985; 37:54–59.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lister J. On a new method of treating compound fracture, abscess, etc., with observations on the conditions of suppuration. Lancet 1: 326–329, 357–359, 387–389, 507–509; 2: 95–95.

  40. Hamilton FH. Deformities After Fractures. Phila: T.K. & P.G. Collins, 1855, pp. 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Pott P. Remarks on the necessity ... of amputation. In Chirurgical Works London: C. Hitch & L. Hawes, 1790, Vol. 3, pp. 371–407.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kirkland T. Thoughts on amputation, being a supplement to the letters on compound fractures and a comment on Dr. (Johann Ulrich) Bilguer's book on this operation. London, 1780, p. 2.

  43. Rutkow IM. Surgery. An Illustrated History. St. Louis: Mosby, 1993, p. 321.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Desault PJ. A Treatise on Fractures, Luxations and Other Affections of the Bones. Phila: Lea & Blanchard, 1805.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Gross SD. The Anatomy, Physiology and Diseases of the Bones and Joints. Phila: J. Grigg, 1830.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Cooper AP. A Treatise on Dislocations and On Fractures of the Joints. London: Longman, 1822.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Cooper AP. The Lectures of Sir Astley Phila.: E.L. Carey & A. Hart, 1835, p. 616.

    Google Scholar 

  48. New Hampshire J Med. Prosecutions for mal-practice. 1854; 4:20–23.

  49. Hamilton FH. Fracture Tables Showing the Results of Treatment in 136 Cases. Buffalo, NY: Jewett Thomas & Co., 1849 (36 pp.); Hamilton FH & Boardman J. Fracture Tables Showing the Results of Treatment in 461 Cases. Buffalo, NY: Jewett Thomas & Co., 1853; Hamilton FH. A New Mode of Treatment for Delayed or Non-Union of a Fractured Humerus. NY: Holman, Gray & Co., 1854 (13 pp.); Hamilton FH. Report on deformities after fractures. Trans AMA 1855; 8:347–393 and 1856; 9:69–233 and 1857; 10:239–453; Hamilton FH. Compound Dislocation of the Long Bones: Considered With Special References the Value of Resection. Phila: T.K. & P.G. Collins, 1857; Hamilton FH. A Practical Treatise on Fractures and Dislocations. Phila: Blanchard & Lea, 1860.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Am J Med Sci. Review of Frank Hamilton's works. 1860; 39: 422.

  51. Spiegel AD. New York Medical College. An early center of excellence in American medical education. J Comm Hlth 1993; 18(5):293–315.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Spiegel AD & Suskind PB. Mary Edwards Walker, M.D.: A feminist physician a century ahead of her time. J Comm Hlth 1996; 21(3):211–235.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ordronaux J. The Jurisprudence of Medicine in Its Relation to the Law of Contracts, Torts and Evidence. Philadelphia: T. & J.W. Johnson, 1869.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ordonaux J. Review of Elwell's text. New York J Med 1860; 8:400.

    Google Scholar 

  55. West Med Surg J. Prosecutions of medical men. 1853; 28:346–347.

  56. Hamilton FH. Papers Read at Meetings, 1875–1878. Suits for malpractice in surgery: Their causes and their remedies. New York: Medico-Legal Society of New York, 1886, p. 98.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Boston Med Surg J. Accusation of malpractice. 1844; 31:123–124.

  58. March A. Case of alledged (sic) malpractice in surgery. BMSJ 1847; 36:9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Shipman AB. Suit for malpractice. BMSJ 1851; 45:40–42.

    Google Scholar 

  60. R.M.K.O. Suit for mal-practice in Vermont. BMSJ 1851; 44:377–378.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Liability of physicians and surgeons. BMSJ 1853; 48:506–507.

  62. Causes and prevention of suits for mal-practice. BMSJ 1853; 48:525.

  63. Suit for mal-practice. BMSJ 1854; 50:246.

  64. Prosecutions for mal-practice. BMSJ 1855; 51:305.

  65. Compound fractures of the leg. Recovery without amputation. BMSJ 1854; 50:73–74.

  66. Hospital reports, MGH. BMSJ 1855; 52:102.

  67. “S”. Suits for mal-practice. BMSJ 1855; 51:502–503.

  68. Ficarra BJ. A history of legal medicine in Legal Medicine Annual edited by C. Wecht. NY: Appleton-Century Crofts, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Dickey NW. Statement of the AMA, U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Judiciary, February 27, 1996, Washington, DC. http:\\www.ama-assn.org\ad-com\roots\legis\profliab\nd0227.html

  70. Queller & Fisher, Attorneys. Dedicated to uphold the rights of the injured consumer. Nov. 19, 1996. http://www.quellerfisher.com/page2.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spiegel, A.D., Kavaler, F. America's First Medical Malpractice Crisis, 1835–1865. Journal of Community Health 22, 283–308 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025104520383

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025104520383

Keywords

Navigation