The Case Against Self-Esteem: Alternative Philosophies Toward Self That Would Raise the Probability of Pleasurable and Productive Living

Abstract

This article discusses two major aspects of the self-esteem movement in public education and psychotherapy to make a strong case that trying to raise or enhance self-esteem in students (as a preventive) or clients (as a treatment) is an unproductive palliative/diversionary intervention that does not lead to emotional health or long-term enjoyment in one's existence. In order to build a case against self-esteem, the two major aspects that will be examined are the following:

1.A clear and precise definition of the self-esteem construct, based on anexhaustive meta-analysis of self-esteem theory/literature in order to evaluateits core philosophical structure.

2.A summary of the research data on self-esteem enhancement, which shows there is no scientific evidence to support even a correlation between higher self-esteem and mental health, productive behaviors, and pleasure inliving.

This article proposes that a philosophy of unconditional self-acceptance (USA), a core construct found in many of the Eastern and Western traditions dealing with productive and pleasurable living, is a desirable philosophy for increasing long-term happiness in one's existence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

REFERENCES

  1. Baumeister, R. (1993). Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Botheme, P. (1946). Alfred Adler: A biography. New York: A. P. Putnam's Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Branden, N. (1969). The psychology of self-esteem. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: The work and lives of 91 eminent people. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dawes, R. M. (1994). House of cards: Psychology and psychotherapy built on myth. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dinkmeyer, D. (1980). The encouragement book. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ellis, A., & London, T. (1993). The case against self-esteem: How the self-esteem movement is damaging our children and culture: A REBT perspective. Chicago, IL: Garfield Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fenner, P. (1995). Reasoning into reality: A system-cybernetics model and therapeutic interpretation of Buddhist Middle Path analysis. Boston, MA: Wisdom Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  9. James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mitchell, S. (1988). Tao Te Ching: The book of the way. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mecca, A., & Smelser, N. (1989). The social importance of self-esteem. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Raimy, V. (1975). Misunderstanding of the self. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Robinson, J. P. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.). (1973). Measures of social psychological attitudes. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

London, T.P. The Case Against Self-Esteem: Alternative Philosophies Toward Self That Would Raise the Probability of Pleasurable and Productive Living. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy 15, 19–29 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025098225171

Download citation

Keywords

  • Mental Health
  • Scientific Evidence
  • Public Education
  • Research Data
  • Precise Definition