The Case Against Self-Esteem: Alternative Philosophies Toward Self That Would Raise the Probability of Pleasurable and Productive Living

  • Terry P. London


This article discusses two major aspects of the self-esteem movement in public education and psychotherapy to make a strong case that trying to raise or enhance self-esteem in students (as a preventive) or clients (as a treatment) is an unproductive palliative/diversionary intervention that does not lead to emotional health or long-term enjoyment in one's existence. In order to build a case against self-esteem, the two major aspects that will be examined are the following:

1.A clear and precise definition of the self-esteem construct, based on anexhaustive meta-analysis of self-esteem theory/literature in order to evaluateits core philosophical structure.

2.A summary of the research data on self-esteem enhancement, which shows there is no scientific evidence to support even a correlation between higher self-esteem and mental health, productive behaviors, and pleasure inliving.

This article proposes that a philosophy of unconditional self-acceptance (USA), a core construct found in many of the Eastern and Western traditions dealing with productive and pleasurable living, is a desirable philosophy for increasing long-term happiness in one's existence.


Mental Health Scientific Evidence Public Education Research Data Precise Definition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baumeister, R. (1993). Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  2. Botheme, P. (1946). Alfred Adler: A biography. New York: A. P. Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar
  3. Branden, N. (1969). The psychology of self-esteem. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  4. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: The work and lives of 91 eminent people. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  5. Dawes, R. M. (1994). House of cards: Psychology and psychotherapy built on myth. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dinkmeyer, D. (1980). The encouragement book. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Ellis, A., & London, T. (1993). The case against self-esteem: How the self-esteem movement is damaging our children and culture: A REBT perspective. Chicago, IL: Garfield Press.Google Scholar
  8. Fenner, P. (1995). Reasoning into reality: A system-cybernetics model and therapeutic interpretation of Buddhist Middle Path analysis. Boston, MA: Wisdom Publications.Google Scholar
  9. James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  10. Mitchell, S. (1988). Tao Te Ching: The book of the way. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  11. Mecca, A., & Smelser, N. (1989). The social importance of self-esteem. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Raimy, V. (1975). Misunderstanding of the self. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Robinson, J. P. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.). (1973). Measures of social psychological attitudes. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Terry P. London
    • 1
  1. 1.Chicago Institute for REBTUSA

Personalised recommendations