Skip to main content
Log in

Patients' rights, quality of life, and health care system performance

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to promote the development of a social contract between patient and clinician that permits patients to state how they want to live as they survive rather than what they are willing to lose to extend their survival. To do this, patients must have sufficient leverage to affect the nature of the care they receive. This leverage, it is proposed, can be achieved by first making a ‘Declaration of Patients’ Rights Relative to Their Quality of Life' and then evaluating the extent to which the patient's providers comply with this rights statement. The paper also reviews The World Health Report 2000 [Health Systems: Improving Performance Geneva: WHO, 2000] as an example of an alternative approach to defining a health care social contract and evaluating a health system's performance. Also discussed, were steps that could be taken to facilitate the integration of the patients' rights statement into medical practice and health care systems performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The World Health Report 2000. Health Systems: Improving Performance. Geneva: WHO, 2000.

  2. Feldman MA. Health care policy evaluation: A conceptual model using medical ethics. J Health Hum Ser Adm 1998; 21: 181–198.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hiller MD. Medical ethics and public policy. In: Hiller MD (ed.), Medical Ethics and the Law, Cambridge: Ballinger, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Reprinted in: La France AB. Bioethics: Health Care, Human Rights and the Law. New York: Matthew Bender, 1999

  5. Howard RE. Dignity, community and human rights. In: Ahmed An-Na'im A (ed.), Human Rights in Cross-Cultural Perspectives: A Quest for Consensus, Philadelphia: Pennsylvania, 1999.

  6. Donnelly J. Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Ithaca: Cornell, 1989.

  7. Veatch RM. A Theory of Medical Ethics. New York: Basic Books, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Annas GJ. A national bill of patients' rights. N Eng J Med 1998; 338: 695–699.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Annas GJ. The Rights of Hospital Patients. New York: Avon, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cantor NL. Quality of life in legal perspective. In: Reich WT (ed), Encyclopedia of Bioethics, New York: McMillian, 1995; 3: 1361–1365.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Faden R, Leplége A. Assessing quality of life: Moral implications for clinical practice. Med Care 1992; 30 (suppl. 5): MS166–MS175.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Burke L. US regulation of pharmaceutical outcomes research. Values Health 2001; 4: 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Osterfeld E. Aristotle on the good life and quality of life. In: Nordenfelt L (ed.), Concepts and Measurement of Quality of Life in Health Care, Amsterdam: Kluwer, 1994; 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brock D. Quality of life measures in health care and medical ethics. In: Spilker B (ed.), Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996; 497–510.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Goodin R. Laundering preferences. In: Elster J, Hylland A (eds), Foundations of Social Choice Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sen A. Well-being, agency and freedom: The Dewey lectures. J Philos 1985; 82: 169–221.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sen A. The Standard of Living. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Calman KC. Quality of life in cancer patients: An hypothesis. J Med Ethics 1984; 10: 124–127.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Welham J, Haire M, Mercer D, Stedman T. A gap approach to exploring quality of life in mental health. Quality Life Res 2001; 10: 421–429.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hunt SM, McKenna SP. The QLDS: A scale for the measurement of quality of life in depression. Health Policy 1992; 11: 307–319.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21. 'World Health Organization Constitution.' in Basic Documents. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1948.

  22. Ware JE. Standards for validating health measures: Definition and content. J Chronic Disarmament 1987; 40: 473–480.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Codman EA. A Study of Hospital Efficiency: The First Five Years. Boston: Thomas Todd, 1916.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Diener E. Subjective well-being. Psychol Bull 1984; 235: 542–575.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Spiegel D, Bloom JR, Kraemer HC, Gottheil E. Effect of psychosocial treatment on survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Lancet 1989; 2: 888–891.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Goodwin PJ, Leszcz M, Ennis M, et al. The effect of group psychosocial support on survival in metastatic breast cancer. N Eng J Med 2001

  27. Spiegel D. Mind matters-group therapy and survival in beast cancer. N Eng J Med 2001; 345: 1767–1768.

    Google Scholar 

  28. American Hospital Association's Statement on a 'Patient's Bill of Rights'. In: Strauss PJ (ed.), The Elder Law Handbook, A Legal and Financial Survival Guide for Caregivers and Seniors, New York: Facts on File, 1996; 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bookbinder M, Coyle N, Thaler H. Implementing national standards for pain management: Program model and evaluation. J Pain Symptom Manag 1996; 12: 334–347.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pain Assessment and Management: An Organizational Approach. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, 2002.

  31. Barofsky I, Sugerbaker PH. Quality of life assessment of the cancer patient. In: Spilker B (ed.), Quality of Life Assessment in Clinical Studies, New York: Raven, 1990; 419–439.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gostin LO. Public Health Law: Power-Duty-Restraint. Berkeley: University of California, 2000; 125.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barofsky, I. Patients' rights, quality of life, and health care system performance. Qual Life Res 12, 473–484 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025095311107

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025095311107

Navigation