Abstract
The present study was an exploratory study of Hong Kong secondary school Integrated Science teachers' perceptions of environmental education. Both questionnaire survey and interviews were used. Teachers were classified according to their scores of attitudes, perceived barriers, and current emphasis on teaching environmental education. This study found that Integrated Science teachers' attitudes toward environmental education, skills of teaching environmental education, beliefs in the relevance of Integrated Science to environmental education, and intentions of teaching environmental education in Integrated Science classes were associated with their actual ways of teaching of environmental education. Teachers tended to teach more environmental education if they held more favorable attitudes toward environmental education, had more skills of teaching environmental education, believed more in the relevance of Integrated Science to environmental education, and would actually want to teach more environmental education in Integrated Science classes if there were fewer constraints. Moreover, variations in the teaching of environmental education were reflected by teachers' emphasis on teaching environmental education, and their use of a variety of teaching methods and their regular practices of extracurricular activities on environmental education.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Kuhl, J., and Beckman, J. (Eds.), Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior, Springer, Berlin, pp.11-39.
Ashley, M. (2000). Science: An unreliable friend to environmental education. Environmental Education Research 6: 269-280.
Chan, K. L. (1995). Implementation of Environmental Education in Primary and Secondary Schools of Hong Kong: Current Status and Barriers, unpublished MEd Thesis, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.Curriculum Development Committee (1986). Syllabus for Science (Form I-III), Government Printer Hong Kong. Curriculum Development Council (1998). Syllabus for Science (Secondary 1-3), Education Department,Hong Kong.Curriculum Development Council (CDC (1999). Guidelines on Environmental Education in Schools, Education Department, Hong Kong. (Originally published in 1992)
Dillion, J., and Scott, W. (2002). Editorial—Perspectives on environmental education-related research in science education. International Journal of Science Education 24: 1111-1117.
Dillon, P. J., and Gayford, C. G. (1997). A psychometric approach to investigating the environmental beliefs, intentions and behaviours of pre-service teachers. Environmental Education Research 3: 283-297.
Fien, J. (1993). Education for the Environment: Critical Curriculum Theorising and Environmental Education, Deakin University Press, Geelong, Australia.
Fullan, M. G. (1991). The New Meaning of Educational Change, 2nd edn., Teachers College Press, New York.
Gayford, C. (1998). The perspectives of science teachers in relation to current thinking about environmental education. Research in Science and Technological Education 16: 101-113.
Gough, A. (1997). Education and the Environment: Policy, Trends and the Problems of Marginalisation, Australian Council for Educational Research, Melbourne.
Gough, N. (1992). Blueprints for Greening Schools, Gould League, Melbourne.
Ham, S. H., and Sewing, D. R. (1987/88). Barriers to environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education 19: 17-24.
Hart, P. (2002). Environment in the science curriculum: The politics of change in the Pan-Canadian science curriculum development process. International Journal of Science Education 24: 1239-1254.
Lane, J., Wilke, R., Champeau, R., and Sivel, D. (1994). Environmental education in Wisconsin: A teacher survey. Journal of Environmental Education 25: 9-17.
Lee, J. C. K. (1997). Environmental education in schools in Hong Kong. Environmental Education Research 3: 359-371.
Lee, J. C. K. (2000). Teacher receptivity to curriculum change in the implementation stage: The case of environmental education in Hong Kong. Journal of Curriculum Studies 32: 95-115.
Lee, J. C. K., and Williams, M. (2001). Researching environmental education in the school curriculum: An introduction for students and teacher researchers. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 10: 218-244.
Lidstone, J., and Gerber, R. (1998). Theoretical underpinnings of geographical and environmental education research: Hiding our light under various bushels. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 7: 87-89.
Littledyke, M. (1997). Science education for environmental education? Primary teacher perspectives and practices. British Educational Research Journal 23: 641-659.
Lucas, A. M. (1980). Science and environmental education: Pious hopes, self-praise and disciplinary chauvinism. Studies in Science Education 7: 1-26.
Miles, M. B., and Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd edn., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Morris, P. (1996). The Hong Kong School Curriculum: Development, Issues and Policies, 2nd edn., Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong.
Palmer, J. A. (1998). Environmental Education in the 21st Century: Theory, Practice, Progress and Promise, Routledge, London.
Robottom, I. (1987). Contestation and consensus in environmental education. Curriculum Perspectives 7: 23-27.
Shuman, D. K., and Ham, S. H. (1997). Toward a theory of commitment to environmental education teaching. Journal of Environmental Education 28: 25-32.
Sia, A. P. (1992). Preservice Elementary Teachers' Perceived Efficacy in Teaching Environmental Education: A Preliminary Study. Paper presented at the ECO-ED North American Association for Environmental Education Annual Conference, Toronto, Canada.
Stimpson, P. (1996). Questionnaire survey in research in environmental and geographical education. In Williams, M. (Ed.), Understanding Geographical and Environmental Education: The Role of Research, Cassell, London, pp.123-134.
Stimpson, P. (1997). Environmental challenge and curricular responses in Hong Kong. Environmental Education Research 3: 345-357.
Tilbury, D. (1995). Environmental education for sustainability: Defining the new focus of environmental education in the 1990s. Environmental Education Research 1:195-212.
Wheeler, K. A., and Bijur, A. P. (2000). Education for a Sustainable Future: A Paradigm of Hope for the 21st Century, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.
Williams, M. (1996). Positivism and the quantitative tradition in geographical and environmental education research. In Williams, M. (Ed.), Understanding Geographical and Environmental Education: The Role of Research, Cassell, London, pp. 6-11.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ko, A.Cc., Lee, J.Ck. Teachers' Perceptions of Teaching Environmental Issues Within the Science Curriculum: A Hong Kong Perspective. Journal of Science Education and Technology 12, 187–204 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025094122118
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025094122118