Abstract
A surprising result of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) is that computer use was negatively associated with high student achievement in some countries. More specifically, the students from all three countries who indicated that they use computers in the classroom most frequently were those with the lowest achievement on the TIMSS in 1995. For the purpose of this study, a similar comparison was made for 15-year-old U.S.A. students, based on the data from the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA). The results of this study show that it is not computer use itself that has a positive or negative effect on the science achievement of students, but the way in which computers are used. For example, after controlling for the student's socioeconomic status in the United States of America, the results indicated that the students who used computers frequently at home, including for the purpose of writing papers, tended to have higher science achievement. However, the results of this study also show that science achievement was negatively related to the use of certain types of educational software. This indicates a result similar to that found in the TIMSS data, which might reflect the fact that teachers assign the use of the computer and of educational software to the lower achieving students more frequently, so that these students can obtain more personal and direct feedback through educational software.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altschuld, J. W. (1995). Evaluating the use of computers in science assessment: Considerations and recommendations. Journal of Science Education and Technology 4: 57-64.
Berger, C. F., Lu, C. R., Beltzer, S. J., and Voss, B. E. (1994). Research on the uses of technology in science education. In Gabel, D., L. (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Science Teaching and Learning, Macmillan, New York, pp. 466-490.
Carlson, R. E., and Wright, D. G. (1993). Computer anxiety and communication apprehension: Relationship and introductory college course effects. Journal of Educational Computing Research 9(3): 329-338.
Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research 53: 445-460.
Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology, Research, and Development 42: 21-29.
Hakkinen, P. (1994). Changes in computer anxiety in a required computer course. Journal of Research in Computer Education 27(2): 141-153.
Igbaria, M., and Chakrabarti, A. (1990). Computer anxiety and attitudes towards microcomputer use. Behavior and Information Technology 9(3): 229-241.
James, R., and Lamb, C. (2000). Integrating science, mathematics, and technology in middle school technology-rich environments: A study of implementation and change. School Science and Mathematics 100: 27-36.
Jonassen, D. H., Campbell, J. P., and Davidson, M. E. (1994). Learning with media: Restructuring the debate. Educational Technology, Research, and Development, 42: 31-39.
Kelly, G. J., and Crawford, T. (1996). Students' interaction with computer representations: Analysis of discourse in laboratory groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 33: 693-707.
Kulik, C. C., and Kulik, J. A. (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. Computers in Human Behavior 7: 75-94.
Lemke, M., Lippman, L., Bairu, G., Calsyn, C., Kruger, T., Jocelyn, L., Kastberg, D., Liu, Y. Y., Roey, S., and Williams, T. (2000). Outcomes of Learning: Results From the 2000 Program for International Student Assessment of 15-Year-Olds in Reading, Science and Science Literacy, National Center for Educational Statistics, Washington, DC, pp. 2002-2115.National Center for Education Statistics. (2000). National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2000 Science Assessment, National Center for Educational Statistics, Washington, DC. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (1999). Measuring Student Knowledge and Skills: A New Framework for Assessment, Author, Paris, France.
Papanastasiou, E. (2002). Factors that differentiate mathematics students in Cyprus, Hong Kong, and the USA. Educational Research and Evaluation 8: 129-146.
Papanastasiou, E. C., and Ferdig, R. E. (2003). Computer use and mathematical literacy. An analysis of existing and potential relationships. In Proceedings of the Third Mediterranean Conference on Mathematical Education, Athens, Hellas: Hellenic Mathematical Society, pp. 335-342.
Pedretti, E., Mayer-Smith, J., and Woodrow, J. (1998). Technology, text and talk: Students' perspectives on teaching and learning in a technology-enhanced secondary science classroom. Science Education 82: 569-589.
Ravitz, J., Mergendoller, J., and Rush, W. (2002, April). Cautionary tales about correlations between student computer use and academic achievement. Paper Presented at Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Reiser, R. A. (1994). Clark's invitation to the dance: An instructional designer's response. Educational Technology, Research and Development 42: 45-48.
Rocheleau, B. (1995). Computer use by school-age children: Trends, patterns, and predictors. Journal of Educational Computing Research 12: 1-17.
Shaw, D. E. (1998). Report to the president on the use of technology to strengthen K-12 education in the United States: Findings related to research and evaluation. Journal of Science Education and Technology 7: 115-126.
Sivin-Kachala, J. (1998). Report on the Effectiveness of Technology in Schools, 1990-1997, Software Publisher's Association, Washington, DC.
Vrasidas, C., and Glass, G. V. (2002). A conceptual framework for studying distance education. In Vrasidas, C., and Glass, G., V. (Eds.), Current Perspectives in Applied Information Technologies: Distance Education and Distributed Learning, Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT, pp. 31-56.
Vrasidas, C., and McIsaac, M. (2001). Integrating technology in teaching and teacher education: Implications for policy and curriculum reform. Educational Media International 38: 127-132.
Weaver, G. C. (2000). An examination of the National Educational Longitudinal Study (NELS: 88) Database to probe the correlation between computer use in school and improvement in test scores. Journal of Science Education and Technology 9: 121-33.
Weller, H. (1996). Assessing the impact of computer-based learning in science. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 28: 461-486.
Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does It Compute? The Relationship Between Educational Technology and Student Achievement in Mathematics, ETS Policy Information Center—Research Division, Princeton, NJ.
Windschitl, M., and Andre, T. (1998). Using computer simulations to enhance conceptual change: The roles of constructivist instruction and student epistemological beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35: 145-160.
Yalcinalp, S., Geban, O., and Ozkan, I. (1995). Effectiveness of using computer-assisted supplementary instruction for teaching the mole concept. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32: 1083-1095.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Papanastasiou, E.C., Zembylas, M. & Vrasidas, C. Can Computer Use Hurt Science Achievement? The USA Results from PISA. Journal of Science Education and Technology 12, 325–332 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025093225753
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025093225753