Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring the Relationship Between Authoritarianism and Attitudes Toward Unions

  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between authoritarianism and attitudes toward unionism. The present study, using a sample of undergraduate business majors, finds a significant and positive correlation between authoritarianism and anti-union attitudes. This suggests that attitudes toward unions are, to some extent, rooted not in simple economic rationality, rather in rigid and dogmatic thought patterns. The implications for labor/management relations, and for successful programs of employee involvement are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adorno, T. W., Frenkel Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applebaum, E., & Batt, R. (1994). The new American workplace. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigoness, W. J. & Tose, H. (1984). Correlates of Boting Behavior in a Union Decertificaiton Election. Academy of Management Journal, 27(3):654–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bluestone, B., & Bluestone, I. (1992). Negotiating the future. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W. N. (1994) Employee participation programs, group-based incentives, and company performance: A union-nonunion comparison. Industrial & Labor Relations Re-view, 47(4), 594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, J. (1993). Employee involvement: Methods for improving performance and work attitudes. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, W. T., & Leonard, J. S. (1985). Accounting for the decline in union membership. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 38(3), 323–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorito, J., Lowman, C., & Nelson, F. D. (1987). The impact of human resource policies on union organizing. Industrial Relations, 26(2),113–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R., & Medoff, J. (1984). What do unions do? New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R., & Kleiner, M. (1990). Employer behavior in the face of union organizing drives. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 43, 351–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. (1985). Why are unions faring poorly in NLRB representation election? In T. A. Kochan, (Ed.), Challenges and Choices Facing American Labor, pp. 45–64. Cam-bridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfield, M. (1987) The decline of organized labor in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M. E. & Long, L. N. (1981). Demographic and Attitudinal Correlates of Union Joining. Industrial Relations, 20(3):306–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, W. B., (1993). Agenda for reform: The future of employment relationships and the law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M., & Harrison, B. (1992). Unions, technology, and labor-management cooperation. In L. Mishel & P. Voos, (Eds.), Unions and Economic Competitiveness. N.E. Sharp Publishers.

  • Kochan, T., Katz, H., & Mckersie, R. B. (1986). The transformation of American industrial relations. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, J. J. (1990). Unionization and deunionization strategy, tactics, and outcomes. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M., (Ed.) (1986). Unions in transition: entering the second century. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morand, D. (1994). The changing situation of U.S. labor law. Labor Law Journal, 19(3).

  • National Labor Relations Act of 1935, amended by Labor Management Relations act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. 141–187.

  • Puette, W. J. (1992). Through jaundiced eyes: How the media view organized labor. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, J. J. (1976). Do authoritarians hold authoritarian attitudes? Human Relations, 29(4), 307–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schriesheim, C. A. (1978). Job Satisfaction, Attitudes Toward Unions and Voting in a Union Representation Election. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(5):548–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. W. (1964). Reference groups. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Lon-don: Cambridge U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurow, L. (1992). Head to head: The coming economic battle among Japan, Europe, and America. New York: Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troy, L. (1986). The rise and fall of American trade unions: The labor movement from FDR to RR. In S. M. Lipset (Ed.), Unions in Transition: Entering the Second Century San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troy, L. (1990). Is the U.S. unique in the decline of private sector unionism? Journal of Labor Research, XI, 111–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, L. (1991). Democracy at work: Changing world markets and the future of labor unions. Ithaca, NY: Cornell U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uchitelle, L. (1995, June 2). Survey points to a cause of union decline. New York Times, pp. D-l.

  • Uphoff, W. H., & Dunnette, M. D. (1956). Understanding the union member. Minneapolis, MN: U. of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (1975). Breaking in: A consideration of organizational socialization. In R. Dubin (Ed.), Handbook of Work, Organizations, and Society. Chicago: Rand-McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, P. (1990). Governing the Workplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morand, D.A. Exploring the Relationship Between Authoritarianism and Attitudes Toward Unions. Journal of Business and Psychology 12, 343–353 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025079530919

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025079530919

Keywords

Navigation