Skip to main content
Log in

Geographical patterns of variation for morphological and agronomic characteristics in the chickpea germplasm collection

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The characterization of diversity in germplasm collections is important to plant breeders for crop improvement and to genebank curators for efficient and effective management of collection. The objective of our study was to describe the phenotypic diversity of the 16 820accessions of chickpea (Cicerarietinum L.) germplasm contained in the ICRISAT genebank. The germplasm accessions were characterized for seven morphological descriptors, reaction to fusarium wilt, and13 agronomic traits to determine phenotypic variation in different geographical regions. Phenotypic variation was found for most traits in all the regions. The means for different agronomic traits differed significantly between regions. The variances for all the traits among regions were heterogeneous. South Asia contained maximum range variation for all the traits. The Shannon-Weaver diversity index was variable in different regions for different traits. Among morphological traits seed colour and among agronomic traits days to50% flowering showed the highest pooled diversity index. The Mediterranean region, which is the primary center of diversity, and Africa, which has the secondary center of diversity in Ethiopia, were poorly represented. Principal component analysis(PCA) using 13 traits and clustering of the first three PC scores delineated two regional clusters consisting Africa, South Asia, and Southeast Asia in the first cluster and the Americas, Europe, West Asia, Mediterranean region, and East Asia in the second cluster.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Food and Agriculture Organization, 2001. http: //www/FAO.ORG FAOSTAT database.

  • IBPGR, ICRISAT & ICARDA, 1993. Descriptors for Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome, Italy; International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, India and International Center for Agriculture Research in the Dry Areas, Aleppo, Syria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keuls, M., 1952. The use of the 'Studentized range' in connection with an analysis of variance. Euphytica 1: 112-122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levene, H., 1960. Robust tests for equality of variances. In: I. Olkin (Ed.), Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honour of Harold Hotelling, pp. 278-292. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev-Yadun, S., A. Gopher & S. Abbo, 2000. The cradle of agriculture. Science 288: 1602-1603.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, M.-T. & J.I. Cubero, 1978. Variation in Cicer arietinum L. Euphytica 27: 465-485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murty, B.R., 1975. Biology of adaptation in chickpea. In: InternationalWorkshop on Grain Legumes (Pigeonpeas and Chickpeas). International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India, pp. 239-251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, R.K.J. & A.J. Macefield, 1976. Adaptive responses and genetic divergence in world germplasm collection of chick pea (Cicer arietinum L.). Theor Appl Genet 47: 179-187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nene, Y.L. & M.V. Reddy, 1987. Chickpea diseases and their control. In: M.C. Saxena & K.B. Singh (Eds.), The Chickpea, pp. 233-270. C.A.B. International Wallingford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nene, Y.L., M.V. Reddy, M.P. Haware, A.M. Ghanekar & K.S. Amin, 1991. Field diagnosis of chickpea diseases and their control. Information Bulletin no. 28. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, D., 1939. The distribution of range in samples from a normal population expressed in terms of an independent estimate of standard deviation. Biometrika 31: 20-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, L.D., B. Ocampo & K.B. Singh, 1997. Morphological variation in wild annual Cicer species in comparison to the cultigen. Euphytica 95: 309-319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J.G., 1997. A global perspective on pigeonpea and chickpea sustainable production systems: Present status and future potential. In: A.N. Asthana & Masood Ali (Eds.), Recent Advances in Pulses Research, pp. 1-31. Indian Society of Pulses Research and Development, Indian Institute of Pulses Research (IIPR), Kanpur, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C.E. & W. Weaver, 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, K.B., 1987. Chickpea breeding. In: M.C. Saxena and K.B. Singh (Eds.), The Chickpea, pp. 127-162. C.A.B. International Wallingford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J., 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 38: 236-244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P.C. & U. Singh, 1987. Nutritional quality and the evaluation of quality in breeding programmes. In: M.C. Saxena and K.B. Singh (Eds.), The Chickpea, pp. 329-356. C.A.B. International Wallingford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Upadhyaya, H.D. Geographical patterns of variation for morphological and agronomic characteristics in the chickpea germplasm collection. Euphytica 132, 343–352 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025078703640

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025078703640

Navigation