Abstract
Knowledge of conversational pragmatic structure was examined by asking 53 female volunteers to rate the naturalness of three versions of an appointment-making conversation from a beauty salon. One version was the naturally occurring conversation. The other two were its two most frequent reconstructions created by a separate group of subjects asked to put the scrambled natural conversation “back together again.” A chi-square lest and standardized deviates showed that the naturally occurring conversation was rated as the most natural one. This result is attributed to subjects' implicit knowledge about conversational pragmatic structure. The role that this knowledge might play in language comprehension is discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Allen, J. A. (1983). Recognizing intentions from natural language utterances. In M. Brady & R. C. Berwick (Eds.), Computational models of discourse. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Allen, J. F., & Perrault, C. R. (1978). Participating in dialogues: Understanding via plan deduction. In Proceedings of the Second National Conference of the Canadian Society for Computational Studies of Intelligence (pp. 215–223). Toronto, Ont.
Allen, J. F., & Perrault, C. R. (1980). Analyzing intention in utterances. Artificial Intelligence, 15, 143–178.
Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1972). Recognition retrieval processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 79, 97–123.
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words (2nd ed.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bahrick, H. P., Bahrick, P. C., & Wittlinger, R. P. (1975). Fifty years of memories for names and faces: A cross-sectional approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 54–75.
Barker, R. G., & Wright, H. F. (1971). The Midwest and its children: The psychological ecology of an American town. Hamden, CN: Archon Books.
Berger, C. R., & Jordan, J. M. (1992). Planning sources, planning difficulty and verbal fluency. Communication Monographs, 59, 130–149.
Bruce, B. C. (1986). Plans and social action. In R. Spiro, B. Bruce, & W. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bunt, H. C. (1989). Information dialogue as communicated action in relation to partner modelling and information processing. In M. M. Taylor, F. Neel, & D. G. Bouwohuis (Eds.), The structure of multimodal dialogue. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Carberry, S. (1990). Plan recognition in natural language dialogue. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clark, H. H. (1979). Responding to indirect speech acts. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 430–477.
Clark, H. H., & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Clarke, D. D. (1975). The use and recognition of sequential structure in dialogue. British Journal of Clinical and Social Psychology, 14, 333–339.
Cohen, P. R., & Perrault, C. R. (1979). Elements of a plan-based theory of speech acts. Cognitive Science, 3, 177–212.
Dickman, H. R. (1963). The perception of behavioral units. In R. G. Barker (Ed.), The stream of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Goldman, S. R. (1982). Knowledge systems for realistic goals. Discourse Processes, 5, 279–303.
Goldthwaite, D. (1988). A pragmatic structural analysis of conversations for making appointments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada.
Goldthwaite, D., & Roberts, W. L. (1993). Pragmatic structure in appointment-making conversations. Journal of Psycholinquistic Research, 22, 579–591.
Good, D. A. (1989). The viability of conversational grammars. In M. M. Taylor, F. Neel, & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), The structure of multimodal dialogue. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Grice, H. P. (1971). Meaning. In P. F. Strawson (Ed.), Philosophical logic. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts. New York: Academic Press.
Grosz, B. J., & Sidner, C. L. (1986). Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12, 175–204.
Haberman, S. J. (1973). The analysis of residuals in cross-classified tables. Biometrics, 29, 205–220.
Hammond, K. J. (1989). Case-based planning: Viewing planning as a memory task, Boston, MA: Academic Press.
Hobbes, J. R., & Evans, D. A. (1980). Conversation as planned behavior. Cognitive Science, 4, 349–377.
Jose, P. E. (1988). Sequentiality of speech acts in conversational structure. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17, 65–88.
Kent, G. (1977). The achievement or orderly interaction: conversational structure rules. British Psychological Socials Bulletin, 30, 172–173.
Kent, G., Davis, J. D., & Shapiro, D. A., (1978). Resources required in the construction and reconstruction of conversation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 13–22.
Kintsch, W. (1970). Models for free recall and recognition. In D. A. Norman (Ed.), Models of human memory. New York: Academic Press.
Levin, J. A., & Moore, J. A. (1976). Dialogue games: A process model of natural language interaction. In Second AISB Summer Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behavior. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, S. C. (1992). Activity types and languages. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Merritt, M. (1976). On questions following questions in service encounters. Language in Society, 5, 315–357.
Nofsinger, R. E. (1991) Everyday conversation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ormanson, R. C., Warren, W. H., & Trabasso, T. (1978). Goals, inferential comprehension, and recall of stories by children. Discourse Processes, 1, 337–354.
Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. London: Sage.
Riesbeck, C. K., & Schank, R. C. (1989). Inside case-based reasoning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1976). Understanding and summarizing brief stories. (Tech. Rep. No. 58). San Diego: University of California, Center for Human Information Processing.
Schank, R. C., & Ableson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.
Schmidt, C. F., Sridharan, N. S., & Goodson, J. L. (1979). The plan recognition problem: An intersection of artificial intelligence and psychology. Artificial Intelligence, 10, 1979.
Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Shadbolt, N. R. (1989). Planning and discourse. In M. M. Taylor, F. Neel, & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), The structure of multimodal dialogue. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goldthwaite, D. Knowledge of Pragmatic Conversational Structure. J Psycholinguist Res 26, 497–508 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025071513114
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025071513114