Skip to main content
Log in

The Abundance and Structure of the Root-Associated Microbial Complexes of Two Greenhouse Rose Cultivars

  • Published:
Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study of the root-associated microbial complexes of affected and healthy rose plants of two cultivars (Grand gala and Royal velvet) grown in a greenhouse showed that the biomass of eukaryotic microorganisms in the rhizoplane and rhizosphere of healthy rose plants and in the surrounding soil was considerably lower than in the same loci of affected plants. In contrast, the biomass of root-associated prokaryotic microorganisms was higher in the case of healthy than in the case of affected rose plants. The root-associated bacterial complexes of both affected and healthy rose plants were dominated by the genera Arthrobacter, Rhodococcus, and Myxobacterium and did not contain phytopathogenic bacteria. The root-associated fungal complex of healthy roses was dominated by fungi of the genus Trichoderma, whereas that of the affected rose plants was dominated by the species Aureobasidium microstictum. The affected cane cuttings and cankers occurring on affected canes were found to contain Coniothyrium fuckelii (the causal fungus of rose stem canker) and sclerotia of Botrytis cinerea (the causal fungus of gray rot). The micromycete complex of healthy rose plants was not so diverse as was the micromycete complex of affected rose plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Whipps, J.M. and Lynch, J.M., The Influence of the Rhizosphere on Crop Productivity, Adv. Microb. Ecol., 1986, vol. 9, pp. 187-244.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rovira, A.D., Foster, R.S., and Martin, J.K., Note on Terminology: Origin, Nature, and Nomenclature of the Organic Materials in the Rhizosphere, The Soil—Root Interface, Harley, J.L. and Russel, R.S., Eds., London: Academic, 1979, pp. 145-160.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Foster, R.C., The Biology of Rhizosphere, Ecology and Management of Soil-borne Plant Pathogens, St. Paul Minn., 1985, pp. 75-79.

  4. Click, B.R. and Bashan, Y., Genetic Manipulation of Plant Growth-promoting Bacteria to Enhance Biocontrol of Phytopathogens, Biotechnol. Adv., 1994, vol. 15,no. 2, pp. 353-378.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Liljeroth, E., Baath, E., Mathiasson, I., and Lundborg, T., Root Exudation and Rhizoplane Bacterial Abundance of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in Relation to Nitrogen Fertilization and Root Growth, Plant Soil, 1990, vol. 127, pp. 81-89.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Youssef, R.A., Kanazawa, S., and Chino, M., Distribution of Microbial Biomass across the Rhizosphere of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in Soils, Biol. Fertil. Soils, 1989, vol. 7, pp. 341-345.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Polyanskaya, L.M., Orazova, M.Kh., Sveshnikova, A.A., and Zvyagintsev, D.G., The Effect of Nitrogen on the Microbial Colonization of the Barley Rhizosphere, Mikrobiologiya, 1994, vol. 63,no. 2, pp. 308-313.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ozerskaya, S.M., The Composition of Soil Micromycetes in Two Mixed Forest Biogeocenoses, Cand. Sc. (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow: Moscow State University, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kirillova, N.P., Microbial Population Dynamics in Model Soil-Plant Systems, Cand. Sc. (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow: Moscow State University, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zvyagintsev, D.G., Dmitriev, E.A., and Kozhevin, P.A., On the Luminescence Microscopy of Soil Microorganisms, Mikrobiologiya, 1978, vol. 47, pp. 1091-1096.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Metody pochvennoi mikrobiologii i biokhimii (Methods of Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1991.

  12. Polyanskaya, L.M., Direct Microscopic Count of Fungal Spores and Mycelium in Soil, Tez. konf. “Izuchenie gribov v biogeotsenozakh” (Proc. of Conf. “The Study of Fungi in Biogeocenoses”), Sverdlovsk, 1988, p. 30.

  13. Polyanskaya, L.M., Microbial Succession in Soil, Doctoral Dissertation, Moscow State University, 1996.

  14. Dobrovol'skaya, T.G., Skvortsova, I.N., and Lysak, L.V., Metody vydeleniya i identifikatsii pochvennykh bakterii (Methods for the Isolation and Identification of Soil Bacteria), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Krieg, N.R. and Holt, J.G., Eds., London: Williams & Wilkins, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ainsworth and Bisby's Dictionary of the Fungi, Hawksworth et al., Eds., 8th ed., Cambridge: Univ. Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Misko, L.A., Rozy. Bolezni i zashchitnye meropriyatiya (Roses: Diseases and Their Control), Moscow: Nauka, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Orazova, M.Kh., Burkanova, O.A., Polyanskaya, L.M., and Zvyagintsev, D.G., Influence of Phosphorus on the Colonization of Barley Rhizosphere by Microorganisms, Mikrobiologiya, 2000, vol. 69,no. 3, pp. 420-425.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Polyanskaya, L.M., Ozerskaya, S.M., Kochkina, G.A. et al. The Abundance and Structure of the Root-Associated Microbial Complexes of Two Greenhouse Rose Cultivars. Microbiology 72, 496–502 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025061210599

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025061210599

Navigation