Abstract
The paper presents a (theoretical) investigation of the distributional impacts of environmental commodities. It introduces an appropriate framework, defines concepts for measuring benefits and examines the determinants of benefit incidence within this setup. Its emphasis is on methodology and on recognizing the relevant economic variables and information. It turns out that in an “equal-preference” model the magnitude of the income elasticity of marginal willingness to pay for an environmental good is the crucial variable determining progressivity. It is related to a number of other elasticities which are more easily accessible to an empirical estimation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaron, H. and M. McGuire (1970), ‘Public Goods and Income Distribution’, Econometrica 38, 907-919.
Baumol, W. J. (1974), ‘Environmental Protection and Income Distribution’, in H. Hochman and G. Peterson, eds., Redistribution through Socials Choice. New York: Columbia University Press.
Baumol, W. J. and W. E. Oates (1988), The Theory of Environmental Policy, second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berck, P. and K. Sydsaeter (1993), Economists’ Mathematical Manual, second edition. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Bergstrom, T. C. and R. P. Goodman, ‘Private Demands for Public Goods’, American Economic Review 63, 280-296.
Borcherding, T. E. and R. T. Deacon (1972), ‘The Demand for Services of Non Federal Governments’, American Economic Review 62, 891-901.
Braden, J. B. and C. D. Kolstad, eds. (1991), Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
Brennan, G. (1976), ‘The Distributional Implications of Public Goods’, Econometrica 44, 391-399.
Brennan, G. (1987), ‘The Distributional Implications of Public Goods’, Econometrica 44, 391-399.
Carson, R., N. E. Flores and W. M. Hanemann (1998), ‘Sequencing and Valuing Public Goods’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36, 314-323.
Cullis, J. and P. Jones (1992), Public Finance and Public Choice. London: Mc Graw Hill.
Diewert, W. E. (1974), ‘A Note on Aggregation and Elasticities of Substitution’, Canadian Journal of Economics 7, 12-20.
Ebert, U. (1993), ‘A Note on Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept’, Social Choice and Welfare 10, 363-370.
Ebert, U. (1997), ‘Selecting Preferences for Nonmarket Goods, Possibilities and Limitations’, Public Finance 52, 301-317.
Ebert, U. (1998), ‘Evaluation of Nonmarket Goods: Recovering Unconditional Preferences’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80, 241-254.
Ebert, U. and P. Lambert (1999), ‘Combined Income Taxes and Tax-benefit Systems’, Economic Record 75, 397-404.
Flores, N. E. and R. T. Carson (1997), ‘The Relationship between the Income Elasticities of Demand and Willingness to Pay’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33, 287-295.
Freeman, A. M. (1972), ‘The Distribution of Environmental Quality’, in A. Kneese and B. Bower, eds., Environmental Quality Analysis. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.
Freeman III, A. M. (1985), ‘Methods for Assessing the Benefits of Environmental Programs’, in A. V. Kneese and J. L. Sweeny, eds., Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics I(6), 223-270. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
Hanemann, W. M. (1991), ‘Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ?’, American Economic Review 81, 635-647.
Höbky, S. and T. Söderqvist (2003), Elasticities of Demand and Willingness to Pay for Environmental Services in Sweden, forthcoming in: Environmental and Resource Economics.
Johannson, P.-O. (1987), The Economic Theory and Measurement of Environmental Benefits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kovenock, D. and E. Sadka (1981), ‘Progression under the Benefit Approach to the Theory of Taxation’, Economics Letters 8, 95-99.
Kristöm, B. and P. Riera (1996), ‘Is the Income Elasticity of Environmental Improvements Less Than One?’, Environmental and Resource Economics 7, 45-55.
Lambert, P. J. (2001), The Distribution and Redistribution of Income, third edition. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Madden, P. (1991), ‘A generalization of Hicksian q-substitutes and Complements with Application to Demand Rationing’, Econometrica 59, 1497-1508.
Maital, S. (1973), ‘Public Goods and Income Distribution: Some Further Results’, Econometrica 41, 561-568.
Mäler, K.-G. (1985), ‘Welfare Economics and the Environment’, in A. V. Kneese and J. L. Sweeney, eds., Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics I(1), 3-60. Amsterdam: Elsevier, Science Publishers B.V.
Neary, J. P. and K. W. S. Roberts (1980), ‘The Theory of Household Behaviour under Rationing’, European Economic Review 13, 25-42.
Pearce, D. W. (1980), ‘The Social Incidence of Environmental Costs and Benefits’, in T. O'Riordan and K. Turner, eds., Progress in Resource Management and Environmental Planning 2, John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
Siebert, H. (1992), Economics of the Environment, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Snow, A. and R. S. Warren (1983), ‘Tax Progression in Lindahl Equilibrium’, Economics Letters 12, 319-326.
Thompson, C. St. and A. W. Tinsley (1978), ‘Income Expenditure Elasticities for Recreation: Their Estimation and Relation to Demand for Recreation’, Journal of Leisure Research 10, 265-270.
Uzawa, H. (1962), ‘Production Functions with Constant Elasticity of Substitution’, Review of Economic Studies 29, 291-299.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ebert, U. Environmental Goods and the Distribution of Income. Environmental and Resource Economics 25, 435–459 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025052225929
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025052225929