Abstract
Gottfredson and Hirschi (A General Theory of Crime, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1990) have proposed a general theory of crime to explain a set of behaviors they refer to as “acts of force and fraud.” Central to their theory is the claim that force and fraud are both manifestations of the individual's unrestrained pursuit of short-term gratification. At the same time, research from numerous disciplines suggests that the correlates of violence differ somewhat from those of property crime. The present study therefore uses data from the National Youth Survey to explore whether force and fraud can legitimately be viewed as manifestations of a single underlying construct among American adolescents. Overall, findings from confirmatory factor analyses suggest that they cannot. Rather, they suggest that multi-factor models of force and fraud improve significantly upon the fit of single-factor models and that force and fraud may therefore reflect overlapping, but empirically distinct, constructs.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Anderson, E. (1994). The code of the streets. Atlantic Monthly 273: 81-94.
Benson, M. L., and Moore, E. (1992). Are white-collar and common offenders the same?. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 29: 251-272.
Bentler, P. M., and Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol. Bull. 88: 588-606.
Bohman, M., Cloninger, R., Sigvardsson, S., and von Knoring, A. L. (1982). Predispositions to petty criminality in Swedish adoptees: I, Genetic and environmental heterogeneity. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 39: 1233-1241.
Bollen, K. A., and Paxton, P. (1998). Detection and determinants of bias in subjective measures. Am. Sociol. Rev. 63: 465-478.
Brennan, P. A., Mednick, S. A., and John, R. (1989). Specialization in violence: Evidence of a criminal subgroup. Criminology 27: 437-453.
Brennan, P. A., Mednick, S. A., and Volavka, J. (1995a). Biomedical factors in crime. In: Wilson, J. Q., and Petersilia, J. (eds.), Crime, ICS Press, San Francisco, pp. 65-90.
Brennan, P. A., Mednick, S. A., and Jacobsen, B. (1995b). Assessing the role of genetics in crime using adoption cohorts. In: Genetics of Criminal and Antisocial Behavior, Wiley, Chischester (Ciba Foundation Symposium 194), pp. 115-128.
Browne, M. W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 37: 62-83.
Browne, M. W., and Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen, K. A., and Long, J. S. (eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Bushway, S., Brame, R., and Paternoster, R. (1999). Assessing stability and change in criminal offending: A comparison of random effects, semiparametric, and fixed effects modeling strategies. J. Quant. Criminol. 15: 23-61.
Cloninger, C. R., Sigvardsson, S., Bohman, M., and von Knorring, A. L. (1982). Predisposition to petty criminality in Swedish adoptees: II, Cross-fostering analysis of gene-environment interaction. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 39: 1242-1247.
Cohen, L., and Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A troutine activies approach. Am. Sociol. Rev. 44: 588-608.
Cole, D. A. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 55: 584-594.
Department of Justice (1998). Uniform Crime Reports, Federal Bureau of Investigation, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Donovan, J. E., and Jessor, R. (1985). Structure of problem behavior in adolescence and young adulthood. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 53: 890-904.
Elliott, D. S., and Ageton, S. S. (1980). Reconciling race and class differences in self-reported and official estimates of delinquency. Am. Sociol. Rev. 45: 95-110.
Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., and Ageton, S. S. (1985). Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Elliott, D. S., and Voss, H. (1974). Delinquency and Dropout, D. C. Health, Lexington, MA.
Evans, T. D., Cullen, F. T., Burton, V. S., Jr., Dunaway, R. G., and Benson, M. L. (1997). The social consequences of self-control: Testing the general theory of crime. Criminology 35: 475-504.
Geis, G. (2000). On the absence of self-control as the basis for a general theory of crime. Theor. Criminol. 4: 35-53.
Gold, M., and Reimer, D. J. (1975). Changing patterns of delinquent behavior amongAmericans 13 to 16 years old 1967–1972. Crime Delinq. Lit. 7: 483-517.
Gottfredson, M., and Hirschi, T. (1990). A General Theory of Crime, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., Bursik, R. J., Jr., and Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 30: 5-29.
Greenberg, D. F. (1977). Delinquency and the age structure of society. Contemp. Crises 1: 189-223.
Greenberg, D. F., Tamerelli, R., and Kelley, M. S. (2002). The generality of the Gottfredson-Hirschi “General Theory of Crime.” In: Waring, E., and Weisburd, D. (eds.), Advances in Criminological Theory: Crime and Social Organization (Vol. 10), Transaction, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 49-94.
Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., and Weis, J. G. (1981). Measuring Delinquency, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Hirschi, T., and Gottfredson, M. (2000). In defense of self-control. Theor. Criminol. 4: 55-69.
Kandel, E., Brennan, P. A., Mednick, S. A., and Michelson, N. M. (1989). Minor physical anomalies and recidivistic adult violent criminal behavior. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 79: 103-107.
Kandel, E., and Mednick, S. A. (1991). Perinatal complications predict violent offending. Criminology 29: 519-529.
Kelley, B. T., Huizinga, D., Thornberry, T. P., and Loeber, R. (1997). Epidemiology of Serious Violence. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, U. S. Department of Justice, June.
Lewis, D. O., Shanok, S. S., and Balla, D. A. (1979). Perinatal difficulties, head and face trauma, and child abuse in the medical histories of seriously delinquent children. Am. J. Psychiatry 136: 419-423.
Loehlin, J. C. (1992). Latent Variable Models: An Introduction to Factor, Path, and Structural Analysis, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Longshore, D. (1998). Self-control and criminal opportunity: A prospective test of the general theory of crime. Soc. Problems 45: 102-113.
Maltz, M. D., and Mullany, J. M. (2000). Visualizing lives: New Pathways for analyzing life course trajectories. J. Quant. Criminol. 16: 255-281.
Maugham, B., Pickles, A., Rowe, R., Costello, E. J., and Angold, A. (2000). Developmental trajectories of aggressive and non-aggressive conduct problems. J. Quant. Criminol. 16: 199-221.
McCord, J. (2000). Developmental trajectories and intentional harm. J. Quant. Criminol. 16:237-253.
Mednick, S. A., Gabrielli, W. H., and Hutchings, B. (1984). Genetic influences in criminal convictions: Evidence from an adoption cohort. Science 224: 891-894.
Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescent-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychol. Rev. 100: 674-701.
Moffitt, T. E., Lynam, D., and Silva, P. A. (1994). Neuropsychological tests predict persistent male delinquency. Criminology 32: 277-300.
Nagin, D. S. (1999). Analyzing developmental trajectories: A semiparametric, group-based approach. Psychol. Methods 4: 139-157.
Osgood, D. W., Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., and Bachman, J. G. (1988). The generality of deviance in late adolescence and early adulthood. Am. Sociol. Rev. 53: 81-93.
Piquero, A. R., Paternoster, R., Mazerolle, P., Brame, R., and Dean, C. W. (1999). Onset age and offense specialization. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 36: 275-299.
Pratt, T. C., and Cullen, F. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology 38: 931-964.
Raftery, A. E. (1995). Basyian model selection in social research. In: Marsden, P. V. (ed.), Sociological Methodology (Vol. 25), pp. 111-163.
Steffensmeier, D. J., Allen, E. A., Harer, M. D., and Streifel, C. (1989). Age and the distribution of crime. Am. J. Sociol. 94: 803-831.
Stolzenberg, R. M., and Relles, D. A. (1997). Tools for intuition about sample selection bias and its correction. Am. Sociol. Rev. 62: 494-507.
Tibbetts, S. G., and Piquero, A. R. (1999). The influence of gender, low birth weight, and disadvantaged environment in predicting early onset of offending: A test of Moffitt's interactional hypothesis. Criminology 37: 843-878.
Vazsonyi, A. T., Lloyd, E. P., Junger, M., and Hessing, D. (2001). An empirical test of theGeneral Theory of Crime: A four-nation comparative study of self-control and the prediction of deviance. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 38: 91-131.
Waldrop, M. F., Bell, R. A., McLaughlin, B., and Halverson, C. F. (1978). New born minor physical anomalies predict short attention span, peer aggression, and impulsivity at age 3. Science 199: 563-564.
White, H. R., and Labouvie, E. W. (1994). Generality versus specificity of problem behaviors:Psychological and functional differences. J. Drug Issues 24: 55-74.
Williams, J. R., and Gold, M. (1972). From delinquent behavior to official delinquency. Soc. Problems 20: 209-229.
Wright, B. R. E., Caspie, A., Moffitt, T. E., and Silva, P. A. (1999). Low self-control, social bonds, and crime: Social causation, social selection, or both? Criminology 37: 479-514.
Wright, R., Logie, R. H., and Decker, S. (1995). Criminal expertise and offender decision-making: An experimental study of the target selection process in residential burglary. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 32: 39-53.
Zager, M. A. (1994). Gender and crime. In: Hirschi, T., and Gottfredson, M. (eds.), The Generality of Deviance, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ.
Zimring, F. E. (1999). Adolescent Homicide at the End of the Millenium: In Search of a Theory. Research presented at Emory University's Violence Studies Lecture Series, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, October 20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rebellon, C.J., Waldman, I. Deconstructing “Force and Fraud”: An Empirical Assessment of the Generality of Crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 19, 303–321 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024961026078
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024961026078