Abstract
Data from an experimental study involving 408 participants were used to test a structural model based on the procedural justice literature. The model posits that two independent variables (processes permitted in a grade appeal procedure and the ombudsman's grade recommendation) affect general attitudes toward the grade appeal procedure. The model further assumes that these effects are mediated by perceived conformity of the appeal procedure with six justice rules (Leventhal, 1980) and by perceived favorability of the ombudsman's recommendation for the student. In addition, the study assessed the psychometric properties of the measure of rule conformity and its six justice rule subscales. Results of structural equation modeling analyses supported the a priori model. As predicted, perceived favorability of the outcome for the student, which presumably was associated with perceived self-interest for our student respondents, had direct effects on perceived conformity of the appeal procedure with the justice rules and on general attitudes toward the procedure. These effects of self-interest are especially important because self-interest is often ignored in theories and research on fairness. In addition, analyses revealed that the measure of rule conformity and its six subscales had sufficiently good psychometric properties to warrant their use in future research on procedural justice. Implications of our findings for Leventhal's model and for educational institutions are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 2 (pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press.
Alexander, S., and Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Social Justice Research 1: 177–198.
American College Personnel Association, Standing Committee on Ethics (1993). American College Personnel Association statement of ethical principles and standards. Journal of College Student Development 34: 89–92.
Barrett-Howard, E., and Tyler, T. R. (1986). Procedural justice as a criterion in allocation decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50: 296–304.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin 107: 238–246.
Bies, R. J., and Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, and M. H. Bazerman (eds.), Research on Negotiation in Organizations, vol. 1 (pp. 43–55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Bordens, K. S., and Abbott, B. B. (1996). Research Design and Methods: A Process Approach, 3rd ed. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.
Cohen, R. L. (1987). Distributive justice: Theory and research. Social Justice Research 1: 19–40.
Crampton, S. M., and Wagner, J. A., III (1994). Percept-percept inflation in microorganizational research: An investigation of prevalence and effect. Journal of Applied Psychology 79: 67–76.
Cropanzano, R., and Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In C. L. Cooper and I. T. Robertson (eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, vol. 12 (pp. 317–372). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Earley, P. C., and Lind, E. A. (1987). Procedural justice and participation in task selection: The role of control in mediating justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52: 1148–1160.
Feldman, K. A. (1989). The association between student ratings of specific instructional dimensions and student achievement: Refining and extending the synthesis of data from multisection validity studies. Research in Higher Education 30: 583–645.
Folger, R. (1987). Reformulating the preconditions of resentment: A referent cognitions model. In J. C. Masters and W. P. Smith (eds.), Social Comparison, Social Justice, and Relative Deprivation: Theoretical, Empirical and Policy Perspectives (pp. 183–215). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Folger, R., and Greenberg, J. (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems. In K. Rowland and G. Ferris (eds.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, vol. 3 (pp. 141–183). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Folger, R., and Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal 32: 115–130.
Fry, W. R., and Leventhal, G. S. (1979, March). Cross-situational procedural preferences: A comparison of allocation preferences and equity across different social settings. Paper presented at the meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
Greenberg, J. (1983). Overcoming egocentric bias in perceived fairness through self-awareness. Social Psychology Quarterly 46: 152–156.
Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology 71: 340–342.
Greenberg, J. (1987). Reactions to procedural injustice in payment distributions: Do the means justify the ends? Journal of Applied Psychology 72: 55–61.
Greenberg, J. (1990). Looking fair vs. being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice. In B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 12 (pp. 111–157). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Greenberg, J., and Folger, R. (1988). Controversial Issues in Social Research Methods. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Grover, S. L. (1991). Predicting the perceived fairness of parental leave policies. Journal of Applied Psychology 76: 247–255.
Jöreskog, K. G., and Sörbom, D. (1989). Lisrel 7: A Guide to the Program and Applications, 2nd ed. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
Kanfer, R., Sawyer, J., Earley, P. C., and Lind, E. A. (1987). Fairness and participation in evaluation procedures: Effects on task attitudes and performance. Social Justice Research 1: 235–249.
Konovsky, M. A., and Cropanzano, R. (1991). Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 76: 698–707.
Konovsky, M. A., and Folger, R. (1991). The effects of procedures, social accounts, and benefits level on victims' layoff reactions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 21: 630–650.
Konovsky, M. A., and Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal 37: 656–669.
Kravitz, D. A., Dillehay, R. C., and Waller, J. E. (1989). Procedural justice: Preferences for alternative procedures and effects of appeal options. Unpublished manuscript.
Kravitz, D. A., and Stone, E. F. (1992, May). Effects of appeal procedures on procedural justice criteria. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Kurtz, S. T., and Houlden, P. (1981). Determinants of procedural preferences of post court-martial military personnel. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 2: 27–43.
Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, and R. H. Willis (eds.), Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research (pp. 27–55). New York: Plenum.
Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., and Earley, P. C. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59: 952–959.
Lind, E. A., Lissak, R. I., and Conlon, D. E. (1983). Decision control and process control effects on procedural fairness judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 13: 338–350.
Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.
Locke, E. A. (ed.) (1986). Generalizing from Laboratory to Field Settings: Research Findings from Industrial-Organizational Psychology, Organizational Behavior, and Human Resource Management. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
McEnrue, M. P. (1989). The perceived fairness of managerial promotion practices. Human Relations 42: 815–827.
McFarlin, D. B., and Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal 35: 626–637.
McGrath, J. E. (1981). Dilemmatics: The study of research choices and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist 25: 179–210.
Moorman, R. H., Niehoff, B. P., and Organ, D. W. (1993). Treating employees fairly and organizational citizenship behaviors: Sorting the effects of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and procedural justice. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 6: 209–225.
Nomani, A. Q. (1995, December 26). A grade strike at Yale is stirring some trouble. Wall Street Journal, p. A1.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Rivera, A. N., and Tedeschi, J. T. (1976). Public versus private reactions to positive inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34: 895–900.
Rodabaugh, R. C., and Kravitz, D. A. (1994). Effects of procedural fairness on student judgments of professors. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching 5(2): 67–83.
Ryer, J. A. (1993). The roles of outcome and fairness perceptions in predicting attitudinal and behavioral reactions to university grading procedures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University at Albany, State University of New York.
Ryer, J. A., and Stone-Romero, E. F. (1996). Outcome levels, expected outcomes, and allocation procedures as predictors of consistency with justice rules, fairness perceptions and organizational behavior. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Schappe, S. P. (1993). The mediating effect of procedural justice on the relationships between knowledge of organizational procedures and personal and work-related outcomes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus.
Shapiro, E. G. (1990). Effect of instructor and class characteristics on students' class evaluations. Research in Higher Education 31: 135–148.
Shea, C. (1995, February 10). Guinier says “insidious” sexism mars legal education for women. Chronicle of Higher Education 41(22):A24.
Sheppard, B. H. (1985). Justice is no simple matter: Case for elaborating our model of procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49: 953–962.
Stone, E. F. (1992). A critical analysis of social information processing models of job perceptions and job attitudes. In C. J. Cranny, P. C. Smith, and E. F. Stone, (eds.), Job Satisfaction: How People Feel About Their Jobs and How It Affects Their Performance (pp. 21–44). New York: Lexington Books.
Stone, E. F., and Gueutal, H. G. (1984). On the premature death of need-satisfaction models: An investigation of Salancik and Pfeffer's views on priming and consistency artifacts. Journal of Management 10: 237–258.
Thibaut, J. W., and Walker, L. (1975). Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tyler, T. R. (1984). The role of perceived injustice in defendants' evaluations of their courtroom experience. Law and Society Review 18: 51–74.
Tyler, T. R. (1987). Conditions leading to value-expressive effects in judgments of procedural justice: A test of four models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52: 333–344.
Tyler, T. R. (1988). What is procedural justice? Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures. Law and Society Review 22: 103–135.
Tyler, T. R. (1994). Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67: 850–863.
Tyler, T. R., and Caine, A. (1981). The influence of outcomes and procedures on satisfaction with formal leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41: 642–655.
Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K. A., and Spodick, N. (1985). Influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48: 72–81.
Walster, E., Walster, G. W., and Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and Research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Wilson, R. (1995, February 10). Harassment charges at Cornell U. Chronicle of Higher Education 41(22): A13–A14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kravitz, D.A., Stone-Romero, E.F. & Ryer, J.A. Student Evaluations of Grade Appeal Procedures: The Importance of Procedural Justice. Research in Higher Education 38, 699–726 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024959820557
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024959820557