Students at nine medium to large state universities were surveyed in this comprehensive investigation of the influences of individual and contextual factors on self-reported academic dishonesty. Results suggested that cheating was influenced by a number of characteristics of individuals including age, gender, and grade-point average, as well as a number of contextual factors including the level of cheating among peers, peer disapproval of cheating, fraternity/sorority membership, and the perceived severity of penalties for cheating. Peer disapproval was the strongest influential factor.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Aiken, L. R. (1991). Detecting, understanding, and controlling for cheating on tests. Research in Higher Education 32(6): 725-736.
Antion, D. L., and Michael, W. B. (1983). Short-term predictive validity of demographic, affective, personal, and cognitive variables in relation to 2 criterion measures of cheating behaviors. Educational and Psychological Measurement 43(2): 467-483.
Baird, J. S. (1980). Current trends in college cheating. Psychology in the Schools 17(4): 515-522.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bonjean, C. J., and McGee, R. (1965). Scholastic dishonesty among undergraduates in different systems of social control. Sociology of Education 38(2): 127-137.
Bowers, W. J. (1964). Student Dishonesty and Its Control in College. New York: Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University.
Cloward, R. A. (1959). Illegitimate means, anomie, and deviant behavior. American Sociological Review 24(2): 164-176.
Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H., and McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty: Prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology 19(1): 16-20.
Gibbs, J. P. (1975). Crime, Punishment, and Deterrence. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Haines, V. J., Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., and Clark, R. E. (1986). College cheating: Immaturity, lack of commitment and the neutralizing attitude. Research in Higher Education 25(4): 342-354.
Hardy, R. J. (1982). Preventing academic dishonesty: Some important tips for political science professors. Teaching Political Science 9(2): 68-77.
Harp, J., and Taietz, P. (1966). Academic integrity and social structure: A study of cheating among college students. Social Problems 13(4): 365-373.
Hetherington, E. M., and Feldman, S. E. (1964). College cheating as a function of subject and situational variables. Journal of Educational Psychology 55(4): 212-218.
Houston, J. P. (1986). Survey corroboration of experimental findings on classroom cheating. College Student Journal 20(2): 168-172.
Jendrek, M. P. (1989). Faculty reactions to academic dishonesty. Journal of College Student Development 30(5): 401-406.
Karabenick, S. A. and Srull, T. K. (1978). Effects of personality and situational variation in locus of control on cheating: Determinants of the “congruence effect”. Journal of Personality 46: 72-95.
Kelly, J. A., and Worrell, L. (1978). Personality characteristics, parent behaviors, and sex of subject in relation to cheating. Journal of Research in Personality 12(2): 179-188.
Kirkvliet, J. (1994). Cheating by economics students: A comparison of survey results. Journal of Economic Education 25(Spring): 121-133.
Leming, J. S. (1980). Cheating behavior, subject variables, and components of the internal-external scale under high and low risk conditions. Journal of Educational Research 74(2): 83-87.
Lipson, A. & McGavern, N. (1993). Undergraduate academic dishonesty: A comparison of student, faculty and teaching assistant attitudes and experiences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Institutional Research, Chicago.
Liska, A. E. (1978). Deviant involvement, associations and attitudes: Specifying the underlying causal structure. Sociology and Social Research 63(1): 73-88.
McCabe, D. L., and Trevino, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influences. Journal of Higher Education 64(5): 520-538.
Merton, R. K. (1957). Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.
Michaels, J. W., and Miethe, T. D. (1989). Applying theories of deviance to academic cheating. Social Science Quarterly 70(4): 872-885.
Nuss, Elizabeth M. (1984). Academic integrity: Comparing faculty and student attitudes. Improving College and University Teaching 32(3): 140-144.
Perry, A. R., Kane, K. M., Bernesser, K. J. & Spicker, P. T. (1990). Type A behavior, competitive achievement striving, and cheating among college students. Psychological Reports 66: 459-465.
Roskens, R. W., and Dizney, H. F. (1966). A study of unethical academic behavior in high school and college. Journal of Educational Research 59(5): 231-234.
Spiller, S. (1993). Still cheating after all these years: A review of empirical research pertaining to academic cheating. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, pp. 168-172.
Stannard, C. I. (1967). The College-Fraternity as an Opportunity Structure. Unpublished M.A. thesis. Northeastern University.
Stannard, C. I., and Bowers, W. J. (1970). The college fraternity as an opportunity structure for meeting academic demands. Social Problems 17(3): 371-390.
Stern, E. B. & Havlicek, L. (1986). Academic misconduct: Results of faculty and undergraduate student surveys. Journal of Allied Health 15(2): 129-142.
Sutherland, E. H. (1947). Principles of Criminology, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
Ward, D. A., and Beck, W. L. (1986). Gender and dishonesty. Journal of Social Psychology 130(3): 333-339.
Ward, D. A. (1986). Self-esteem and dishonest behavior revisited. The Journal of Social Psychology 126(6), 709-713.
Ward, D. A. and Beck, W. L. (1990). Gender and dishonesty. The Journal of Social Psychology 130(3): 333-339.
Wright, J. C., and Kelly, R. (1974). Cheating: Student/faculty views and responsibilities. Improving College and University Teaching 22: 31-34.
Zimring, F. E., and Hawkins, G. J. (1973). Deterrence: The Legal Threat in Crime Control. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
About this article
Cite this article
McCabe, D.L., Trevino, L.K. Individual and Contextual Influences on Academic Dishonesty: A Multicampus Investigation. Research in Higher Education 38, 379–396 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024954224675
- Influential Factor
- Contextual Factor
- Education Research
- Large State
- Comprehensive Investigation