Skip to main content
Log in

Individual Differences in Hand Movements During Deception

  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article addresses the influence of 2 personality traits on making hand movements during deception, namely public self-consciousness and ability to control behavior. It was hypothesized that especially individuals with high public self-consciousness and individuals who are skilled in controlling their behavior would make fewer hand movements during deception compared to truth-telling. A total of 56 participants were interviewed twice; in one interview they told the truth and in the other interview they lied. Before the interviews the participants completed a personality inventory to measure their levels of public self-consciousness and ability to control their behavior. The results supported the hypotheses. Some implications of these findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Akehurst, L., Köhnken, G., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (1996). Lay persons' and police officers' beliefs regarding deceptive behaviour. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 461–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, D. B., Burgoon, J. K., White, C. H., & Ebesu, A. S. (1994). Interpersonal deception VII. Behavioral profiles of falsification, equivocation, and concealment. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 366–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., Kelley, D. L., Newton, D. A., & Keely-Dyreson, M. P. (1989). The nature of arousal and nonverbal indices. Human Communication Research, 16, 217–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, S. R., Cheek, J. M., & Buss, A. H. (1980). An analysis of the Self-Monitoring Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 679–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M., & Hadiks, D. (1995). Demeanor and credibility. Semiotica, 106, 5–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M. (1988). Nonverbal aspects of deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 153–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M. (1992). Nonverbal behavior and self-presentation. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 233–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., Kashy, D. A., Kirkendol, S. E., Wyer, M. M., & Epstein, J. A. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 979–995.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., & Kirkendol, S. E. (1989). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 51–70). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., Stone, J. L., & Lassiter, G. D. (1985). Deceiving and detecting deceit. In B. R. Schenkler (Ed.), The self and social life (pp. 323–370). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1985). Telling lies. New York. W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1988). Lying and nonverbal behavior: Theoretical issues and new findings. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 163–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1989). Why lies fail and what behaviors betray a lie. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility Assessment (pp. 71–82). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1972). Hand movements. Journal of Communication, 22, 353–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., O'Sullivan, M., Friesen, W. V., & Scherer, K. R. (1991). Face, voice, and body in detecting deceit. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 125–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exline, R., Thibaut, J., Hickey, C., & Gumpert, P. (1970). Visual interaction in relation to Machiavellianism and an unethical act. In P. Christie & F. Geis (Eds.), Studies in Machiavellianism (pp. 53–75). New York, NJ: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 522–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höfer, E., Köhnken, G., Hanewinkel, R., & Bruhn, Ch. (1992). Diagnostik und attribution von glaubwürdigkeit. Kiel: final report to the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, KO 882/4-2.

  • Kalbfleisch, P. J. (1994). The language of detecting deceit. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 469–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashy, D. A., & DePaulo, B. M. (1996). Who lies? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1037–1052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, M. L., Hart, R. P., & Dennis, H. S. (1974). An exploration of deception as a communication construct. Human Communication Research, 1, 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhnken, G. (1989). Behavioral correlates of statement credibility: Theories, paradigms and results. In H. Wegener, F. Lösel, & J. Haisch (Eds.), Criminal behavior and the justice system: Psychological perspectives (pp. 271–289). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhnken, G. (1990). Glaubwürdigkeit: Untersuchungen zu einem psychologischen konstrukt. München: Psychologie Verlags Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R. E., & Poe, D. (1980). On the line: The deception judgments of customs inspectors and laymen. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 380–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hair, H. D., Cody, M. J., & McLaughlin, M. L. (1981). Prepared lies, spontaneous lies, Machiavellianism, and nonverbal communication. Human Communication Research, 7, 325–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. L. (1995). A parallel process model of nonverbal communication. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 19, 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggio, R. E. (1986). Assessment of basic social skills. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 649–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggio, R. E., & Friedman, H. S. (1983). Individual differences and cues to deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 899–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggio, R. E., Tucker, J., & Throckmorton, B. (1988). Social skills and deception ability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 568–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegman, A. W., & Reynolds, M. A. (1983). Self-monitoring and speech in feigned and unfeigned lying. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A. (1993). Credibility judgments of detectives: The impact of nonverbal behavior, social skills, and physical characteristics. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 601–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A. (1995). Behavioral correlates of deception in a simulated police interview. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 129, 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A. (1996). Misverstanden tussen politie en verdachten in een gesimuleerd politieverhoor. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 51, 137–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A. (1997). Nonverbal communication and credibility. In A. Memon, A. Vrij, & R. Bull. Legal psychology: Accuracy and perceived credibility of suspects, victims and witnesses (work title). New York: McGraw Hill, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A., & Semin, G. R. (1996). Lie experts' beliefs about nonverbal indicators of deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20, 65–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A., Semin, G. R., & Bull, R. (1996). Insight into behavior during deception. Human Communication Research, 22, 544–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 1–59). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vrij, A., Akehurst, L. & Morris, P. Individual Differences in Hand Movements During Deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 21, 87–102 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024951902752

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024951902752

Keywords

Navigation