Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to illustrate how the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) can be applied to those situations in higher education where a group must evaluate a large number of alternatives. The suggested approach is illustrated using a case study that considers the evaluation of academic research papers at Villanova University. Following the discussion of this successful case study, a second example indicates how the AHP can be applied to the more complex problem of institution-wide strategic planning. These examples clearly demonstrate that the AHP approach is a versatile tool that can be applied to a wide range of important academic evaluation problems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Aczel, J., and Saaty, T. L. (1983). Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgments. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 27: 93-102.
Arbel, A. (1983). A university budget problem: A priority-based approach. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 17(4): 181-189.
Canada, J. R., Frazelle, E. H., Koger, R. K., and MacCormac, E. (1985). How to make a career choice: The use of the analytic hierarchy process. Industrial Management 27(5): 16-22.
Dyer, J. S. (1990a). Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science 36(3): 249-258.
Dyer, J. S. (1990b). A clarification of “remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process.” Management Science 36(3): 274-275.
Expert Choice, Inc. (1995). Expert Choice for Windows, Version 9.0, Pittsburgh, PA.
Golden, B. L., Wasil, E. A., and Harker, P. T. (eds.) (1989). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York, Springler-Verlag.
Harker, P. T., and Vargas, L. G. (1990). Reply to “Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process” by J. S. Dyer. Management Science 36(3): 269-273.
Hope, R. P., and Sharpe, J. A. (1989). The use of two planning decision support systems in combination for the redesign of an MBA information technology programme. Computers and Operations Research 16(4): 325-332.
Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. New York: Wiley.
Kwak, N. K., and Diminnie, C. B. (1987). A goal programming model for allocating operating budgets of academic units. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 21(5): 333-339.
Lee, S. M. (1972). Goal Programming for Decision Analysis. Philadelphia: Auerbach.
Liberatore, M. J., Nydick, R. L., and Sanchez, P. M. (1992). The evaluation of research papers (or how to get an academic committee to agree on something). Interfaces 22(2): 92-100.
Lootsma, F. A. (1980). Saaty's priority theory and the nomination of a senior professor in operations research. European Journal of Operational Research 4(6): 380-388.
Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15(3): 234-281.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Saaty, T. L. (1982). Decision Making for Leaders. Belmont, CA: Lifetime Learning Publications, Division of Wadsworth.
Saaty, T. L. (1990). An exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper “Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process.” Management Science 36(3): 259-268.
Saaty, T. L. (1994). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces 24(6): 19-43.
Saaty, T. L., and, Ramanujam, V. (1983). An objective approach to faculty promotion and tenure by the analytic hierarchy process. Research in Higher Education 18: 311-331.
Saaty, T. L., and Rogers, L. R. (1976). Higher education in the United States (1985–2000): Scenario construction using a hierarchical framework with eigenvector weighting. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 10: 251-263.
Tadisina, S. K., and Bhasin, V. (1989). Doctoral program selection using pairwise comparisons. Research in Higher Education 30(4): 403-418.
Trout, M. D., and Tadisina, S. K. (1992). The analytic hierarchy process as a model base for a merit salary recommendation system. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 11: 276-281.
Tummala, V. M. R., and Sanchez, P. P. (1988). Evaluating faculty merit awards by analytic hierarchy process. Modelling, Simulation and Control C: Environmental, Biomedical, Human and Social Systems 11(4): 1-13.
Vargas, L. G., and Zahedi, F. (eds.) (1993). Special issue on the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 17(4–5).
Wasil, E. A., and Golden, B. L. (eds.) (1991). Public sector applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 25(2).
White, G. P. (1987). A survey of recent management science applications in higher education. Interfaces 17: 97-108.
Winkler, R. L. (1990). Decision modeling and rational choice, AHP and utility theory. Management Science 36(3): 247-248.
Zahedi, F. (1986). The analytic hierarchy process—A survey of the method and its applications. Interfaces 16(4) 96-108.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liberatore, M.J., Nydick, R.L. Group Decision Making in Higher Education Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Research in Higher Education 38, 593–614 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024948630255
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024948630255