Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using the EuroQol 5-D in the Catalan General Population: Feasibility and Construct Validity

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spanish and Catalan versions of the EuroQol 5-D (EQ-5D) were included in the Catalan Health Interview Survey (CHIS) and administered to a randomly selected cross-section of 12,245 individuals from the Catalan general population. This paper analyses the feasibility, convergent validity and construct validity of three parts of the EQ-5D (the descriptive system, the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Spanish tariff) using the results obtained in the CHIS. The feasibility was assessed by the number of missing responses. The convergent validity was based on the correlations between the EQ-5D scores and the scores on the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) and on an index of self-perceived overall health. The construct validity was assessed by analysing the degree to which lower scores on the EQ-5D correlated positively with increasing age, being female, being in a lower social class or having a lower level of education and with increasing levels of disability, co-morbidity, restricted activity, mental health problems and poor self-perceived health. A low number of missing responses on the descriptive system and the VAS (1.5%) indicated a high level of acceptance. A marked ceiling effect was found, with 67% of the sample reporting no problem in any EQ dimension. The convergent validity with the GHQ was generally low, though moderate on the mood dimension. Self-perceived overall health correlated moderately to strongly with the mean VAS and tariff values. The positive correlations between lower scores on all three elements of the EQ-5D and increasing age, increasing levels of disability, co-morbidity, restricted activity, mental health problems and poor self-perceived health provide some evidence of the instrument's construct validity, as does the fact that women reported more problems than men. Multivariate analyses using the VAS and tariff values as dependent variables and all of the sociodemographic and health variables as independent variables reached R 2 values of 0.45 and 0.81, respectively. The Spanish and Catalan versions of the EQ-5D have proved to be feasible and valid for use in health interview surveys.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cella DF, Wiklund I, Shumaker SA, Aaronson NK. Integrating health-related quality of life into cross-national clinical trials. Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 433–440.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Steinwachs CM. Application of health status measures in policy research. Med Care Suppl 1989; 27: S12–S26.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Deyo RA, Inui TS. Toward clinical applications of health status measures: sensitivity of scales to clinically important changes. Health Serv Res 1984; 19: 275–289.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Patrick DL, Erickson P. Health Status and Health Policy: Quality of Life in Health Care Evaluation and Resource Allocation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brooks R with the EuroQol Group. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 1996; 37: 53–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gudex C, Dolan P, Kind P, Williams A. Health state valuations from general public using the visual analogue scale. Qual Life Res 1996; 5: 521–531.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Erens B. Health-related Quality of Life: General Population Survey. Technical Report. London: Social Community Planning Research, 1994:1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brazier J, Jones N, Kind P. Testing the validity of the EuroQol and comparing it with the SF-36 health survey questionnaire. Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 169–180.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hurst NP, Jobanputra P, Hunter M, Lambert M, Lochhead A, Brown H. Validity of EuroQol — A generic health status instrument — in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1994; 33: 655–662.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stavem K. Quality of life in epilepsy: comparison of four utility measures. Qual Life Res 1995; 4: 489–490.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frossard M, Jasso G, LaGabrielle D, Guyot F, Suarez C, Franco A. A comparison of four measures of the quality of life: preliminary results of the study ‘QUALIDOVIE’. Qual Life Res 1995; 4: 430.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Enquesta de Salut de Catalunya (ESCA): Document Tecnic. Barcelona: Departament de Sanitat i Seguretat Social, 1993.

  13. Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, Williams A. The time trade-off method: results from a general population study. Health Econ 1996; 5: 141–154.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rue M, Badia X. The Spanish EuroQol tariff: results from the Catalan Health Interview Survey based on self-rated health. In: Badia X, Herdman M, Segura A, eds Discussion Papers from the EuroQol Plenary Meeting. Barcelona: Catalan Institute of Public Health, 1995: 77–98.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gudex C, Dolan P, Kind P, Williams A. Health state valuations from the general public using the visual analogue scale. Qual Life Res 1997; 5: 521–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Arto O, Eija Helala, Sintonen H. Modelling EuroQol values of Finnish adult population. In: Badia X, Herdman M, Segura A, eds. Discussion Papers from the EuroQol Plenary Meeting. Barcelona: Catalan Institute of Public Health, 1995: 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Badia X, Fernandez E, Segura A. Influence of socio-demographic and health status variables on evaluation of health states in a Spanish population. Eur J Public Health 1995; 5: 87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Badia X, Díaz Prieto A, Rué M, Patrick DL. Measuring health and health state preferences among critically ill patients. Intens Care Med 1997; 22: 1379–1384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Domingo A, Marcos J. Propuesta de un indicador de “clase social” basado en la ocupación. Gac Sanitaria 1989; 3(10): 320–326.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Goldberg DP. The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire. London: Oxford University Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bergner M, Bobbitt R, Pollard WE, Martin DP, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: validation of a health status measure. Med Care 1976; 14: 57–67.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Alonso J, Antó JM. Enquesta de Salut de Barcelona, 1986. Barcelona: Ârea de Salut Pública, Ajuntament de Barcelona, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Borrell C, Passaún I, Plasència A. Enquesta de Salut de Barcelona 1992–1993. Estadístiques de Salut No. 23. Barcelona: Ajuntament de Barcelona, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Encuesta Nacional de Salud 1993. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, 1995.

  25. Netherlands Central Bureau of Statistics and Erasmus University. International Variation in Socio-economic Inequalities of Self-reported Health. Voorburg: Netherlands Central Bureau of Statistics, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE. Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods. Belmont: Duxbury Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kind P, Gudex C, Dolan P, Williams A. Sociodemographic variations in self-rated quality of life. Qual Life Res 1995; 4: 446–447.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kind P. Weighting life expectancy for quality — whose values count? Qual Life Res 1995; 4: 447–448.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hays RD, Anderson R, Revicki DA. Psychometric evaluation and interpretation of health-related quality of life data. In: Shumaker SA, Berzon R, eds. The International Assessment of Health-related Quality of Life: Theory, Translation, Measurement and Analysis. Oxford, New York: Rapid Communications, 1995. pp. 103–114.

    Google Scholar 

  31. EuroQol Group. EuroQol — a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16: 199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Furlong W, Feeny D, Boyle M, Torrance GW. Multiattribute health status classification systems. Health Utilities Index. PharmacoEconomics 1995; 7: 490–502.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dupuy HJ. The psychological general well-being (PGWB) index. In: Wergner NK, Mattson ME, Fuberg CP, eds. Assessment of Quality of Life in Clinical Trials of Cardiovascular Therapies. New York: Le Jacq, 1984. pp. 170–183.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Catalan Institute of Public Health, Universitat de Barcelona, Ctra de la Feixa Llarga S/N, 08907 L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain

    X. Badia, A. Schiaffino & M. Herdman

  2. Health Services Research Unit, Institut Municipal d'Investigació Mèdica (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain

    J. Alonso

Authors
  1. X. Badia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Schiaffino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Alonso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Herdman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Badia, X., Schiaffino, A., Alonso, J. et al. Using the EuroQol 5-D in the Catalan General Population: Feasibility and Construct Validity. Qual Life Res 7, 311–322 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024933913698

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024933913698

Search

Navigation